# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Governance

BIP-110 Could Split Bitcoin In New Soft Fork Fight, Jameson Lopp Warns

bitcoinist02/25 09:18

The Silicon-Carbon Co-Governance Journey of a Crypto Company — Cobo's Internal AI Transformation

From its core crypto custody and stablecoin payment operations, Cobo began exploring AI integration in late 2024. Initially, the team experimented with an MCP-based app store but pivoted due to high development costs and lack of standardization. Facing high talent costs and internal resistance, Cobo shifted focus inward, aiming to transform internal operations rather than client-facing products first. A major challenge was security: the company implemented a permission-based internal knowledge system and agent framework using Claude and Gemini with zero-data-retention agreements, ensuring strict data isolation and auditability. Adoption was slow until management enforced AI integration top-down, starting with an OKR Agent that automated goal-setting, progress tracking, and performance reviews. This “silicon-carbon co-governance” approach made AI use mandatory and performance-linked. Over 100 department-specific agents were developed—for customer service, legal, sales, and more—shifting the company’s mindset from hiring more people to deploying AI systems first. Key learnings: healthy cash flow is essential for such transformations; change must be driven from leadership; enforced usage is necessary; and internal AI maturity must precede external AI products. As an outcome, Cobo recently launched WaaS Skill, an AI-agent-integrated financial API layer, reducing development cycles from weeks to conversation-level interactions—a direct result of its internal AI transformation.

marsbit02/25 09:05

Bitcoin Community Erupts, BIP-110 Sparks Value Dispute Among OG's Attention

Bitcoin community is embroiled in a heated debate over BIP-110, a proposal aiming to restrict non-financial data such as Ordinals and Runes inscriptions via a soft fork. The initiative, led by developer Dathon Ohm, represents a push by "minimalists" against what they deem excessive data usage that threatens network performance and decentralization. A key point of contention is the proposal’s 55% activation threshold—significantly lower than Bitcoin’s traditional 95% miner approval requirement for consensus changes. Supporters argue it prevents minority veto power and defends against blockchain "spam," while opponents, including Adam Back and Michael Saylor, warn it risks chain splits, undermines immutability, and sets a dangerous precedent for future governance. The debate also touches on economic concerns: miners fear losing fee revenue from inscription transactions, while proponents claim current SegWit discounts unfairly subsidize non-monetary data. Node operators are already shifting client allegiance, with Bitcoin Knots gaining traction. Ultimately, BIP-110 raises fundamental questions about Bitcoin’s purpose: whether it should remain purely monetary or accommodate broader data use cases, balancing scalability, security, and decentralization.

marsbit02/25 08:58

BlackRock and Citadel Are Aggressively 'Sweeping Goods': What Fundamental Changes Have Occurred in the Logic of TradFi Entering DeFi?

Traditional finance (TradFi) giants like BlackRock, Citadel Securities, and Apollo Global Management are now directly purchasing DeFi governance tokens (UNI, ZRO, MORPHO), signaling a strategic shift beyond mere equity investments or pilot programs. This move is primarily about securing access to and aligning with the infrastructure they plan to use for tokenizing and distributing their products on-chain, rather than making broad portfolio bets on DeFi assets. Key drivers include improved custody/operational infrastructure and greater regulatory clarity, such as the upcoming repeal of SAB 121 and potential market structure legislation like the CLARITY Act. While this represents a structural change in institutional engagement, the token price impact has been muted due to weak market conditions and a lack of direct value capture mechanisms for most tokens. For governance tokens to function more like strategic equity, clearer value accrual (e.g., fee switches), reduced VC selling pressure, and enhanced regulatory certainty are needed. Concerns about governance centralisation exist, but increased professional participation could improve oversight. More TradFi firms, particularly those building tokenized products (e.g., Fidelity, Franklin Templeton), are expected to follow, focusing on blue-chip protocols in stablecoins, RWAs, and trading infrastructure.

marsbit02/24 10:45

Why Do 85% of Token Launches Ultimately Become Expensive 'Funerals'?

According to Arrakis Research, 85% of tokens launched in 2025 ended the year with negative returns, highlighting a systemic failure in token design rather than market conditions. Token Generation Events (TGEs) are not celebrations but "open gladiator arenas" where flawed economic models are exploited. Key failures include excessive Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV) over $1 billion, which had a 100% failure rate, and low initial circulation, leading to massive sell pressure upon unlocks. Only 9.4% of tokens that dropped in their first week recovered. The report identifies four critical success factors: 1. **Sybil Resistance:** Filtering out airdrop farmers (e.g., LayerZero’s efforts reduced initial sell-off). 2. **Revenue-Based Airdrops:** Treating airdrops as customer acquisition costs tied to real protocol usage. 3. **Ready Infrastructure:** Staking, governance, and custody must be operational at launch to provide utility and retain holders. 4. **Effective Market Makers:** Choosing transparent market-making services that provide liquidity depth, not artificial demand. The ultimate goal is achieving decentralization in development, governance, value distribution, and participation. Success requires building genuine demand through protocol utility, not marketing hype. Tokens must be designed to withstand inherent sell pressure from airdrop recipients, exchanges, and market makers from day one.

marsbit02/24 09:21

Pi Network Introduces PiRC1 Token Framework for Mainnet Ecosystem

Pi Network has introduced the PiRC1 token framework, a new utility-oriented standard for creating and managing tokens within its Mainnet ecosystem. This framework provides structured guidelines for token issuance, distribution, and emission logic, aiming to support real-world applications and services. A key feature is that funds from token launches will be directed to liquidity pools rather than project teams, enhancing trade stability. The proposal is open for community feedback on GitHub, reflecting Pi Network’s focus on community-driven governance. The move is expected to attract more developers and provide competitive advantages by offering clear operational parameters. This development coincides with significant Mainnet growth, including millions of users completing identity verification.

TheNewsCrypto02/23 14:30

Too busy to vote? Vitalik Buterin says AI can do it for you!

Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum Co-Founder, has proposed a novel solution to address low participation and centralization in DAO governance: AI-powered voting agents. Instead of requiring users to manually vote on every proposal, each user would have a personal AI model trained on their messages, opinions, and past decisions. This AI would then vote on their behalf, exactly as the user would. Buterin highlights that the current delegation model is disempowering and leads to voting power being concentrated with a few large token holders. His proposal aims to make DAOs more scalable and truly decentralized. A key aspect is ensuring user privacy and security. These AI agents would operate within secure systems like trusted execution environments, and zero-knowledge proofs could be used to protect voter identity and prevent risks like bribery or coercion. Furthermore, AI agents could automatically handle routine votes, alerting users only for important decisions, and prediction markets could be used to filter out spam proposals. In summary, this AI voting system could fundamentally transform DAO governance by increasing participation, reducing centralization, and maintaining user privacy.

ambcrypto02/23 03:03

Airdrop Weekly Report｜Polymarket Officially Announces No Airdrop Snapshot Yet; Jupiter Initiates Vote to Cancel 2026 Jupuary Airdrop (2.9-2.22)

Odaily Planet Daily's Airdrop Roundup (Feb 9 - Feb 22, 2026) covers key airdrop opportunities and major news. Several projects opened claims or registrations: - **Espresso**, a global sequencing layer, opened claims for its ESP token (current price: $0.075). It has raised $60M. - **Open Mind**, a decentralized AI architecture for robots, opened registration for its ROBO airdrop. It raised $20M in 2025. - **Puffpaw**, a dePIN project for e-cigarettes, opened airdrop registration for Genesis NFT holders and Discord OGs. It raised $6M. - **SoDEX**, a trading chain from SoSoValue, opened claims for SOSO tokens ($0.39) for its testnet contributors. SoSoValue has raised $19.15M. Key airdrop news: - **Polymarket** officials confirmed that a token airdrop snapshot has **not yet been taken**. - **Jupiter DAO** began a vote on canceling the 2026 "Jupuary" airdrop to prevent token dilution. The proposal suggests returning 700M JUP to the treasury. - Hong Kong legislator **Duncan Chiu** suggested airdropping stablecoins as consumer vouchers to promote their use after the first issuer licenses are expected to be granted in March.

marsbit02/22 09:43

Aave struggles as BGD Labs plans April exit amid governance crisis

BGD Labs, a major service provider for the Aave DAO, announced it will exit by early April, citing concerns over Aave Labs' aggressive push toward centralized control. The team criticized Aave Labs for disregarding existing contributors' expertise and leveraging its influence over brand rights and voting power. BGD Labs, which built much of Aave V3, accused Aave Labs of promoting its own V4 upgrade by criticizing the current version. In response, Aave Labs founder Stani Kulechov assured the community that maintenance would continue and expressed support for retaining BGD under a new security arrangement. The ongoing governance crisis, including previous disputes over revenue sharing and a $50 million funding demand from Aave Labs, has unsettled investors. AAVE’s price dropped 8% following the news, reflecting market uncertainty.

ambcrypto02/21 10:01

In the Face of Quantum Threats, Bitcoin Core Developers Choose to Ignore

This article examines the perceived indifference of Bitcoin's most influential core developers toward the quantum computing threat. Despite active research from some community members, the key decision-makers—often referred to as the "high priests" of Bitcoin—largely dismiss quantum risk as distant, theoretical, or non-urgent. Key figures like Pieter Wuille acknowledge the issue but see no immediate danger, while others like Peter Todd and Adam Back openly deny its feasibility or relevance in the near term. Developers such as Jonas Nick and researchers like Ethan Heilman and Hunter Beast are actively working on post-quantum solutions, but their efforts lack traction among the top-tier gatekeepers who control protocol changes. The governance structure of Bitcoin, which requires consensus among a small group of influential developers, results in inertia and makes proactive upgrades difficult. Without support from figures like Wuille, Maxwell, or Back, substantive changes to address quantum vulnerabilities are unlikely. The article concludes that quantum mitigation is not a priority for Bitcoin's core development leadership, despite growing external concerns.

marsbit02/20 11:22