# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Governance

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Governance", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Valuation Collapse and Revenue Divergence: Reassessing the True Logic of Crypto Assets

Cryptocurrency valuations are collapsing as the industry matures, with infrastructure tokens losing their premium while revenue becomes concentrated in a few key sectors. Despite generating record fees ($74.8B since 2018, nearly half in 2024-2025), the market is gripped by fear, with projects shutting down and talent migrating to AI. Stablecoin issuers Tether and Circle now capture 34.3% of all crypto fees, benefiting from massive demand (hedging against inflation in emerging markets) and near-zero marginal costs. Their dominance stems from distribution advantages and Lindy effects, not technical superiority. Meanwhile, speculative trading products (Telegram bots, perpetual exchanges like Hyperliquid) grew rapidly, accounting for over 15% of fees by 2025. These leverage crypto’s mature infrastructure to offer high-risk, dopamine-driven financial services. In contrast, DeFi protocols and L1/L2 chains face valuation compression. Price-to-fee ratios for major chains (Solana, Arbitrum, Optimism) fell dramatically as novelty premiums faded. The market now values revenue-generating protocols rationally—often at or below traditional finance multiples (e.g., Aave at 4x P/S vs. Visa’s 15x). The key insight: Crypto’s must build real economic moats (first-mover advantage, liquidity, or distribution) and赋予代币实际权益 token holders with clear economic rights and governance power. The era of speculative narratives is over; sustainable value comes from capturing fees via high-frequency trading or trust-minimized transactions.

marsbit03/06 10:07

Valuation Collapse and Revenue Divergence: Reassessing the True Logic of Crypto Assets

marsbit03/06 10:07

Core 'Key Contributors' Depart One After Another, Has Aave's DAO Dream Shattered?

Recent weeks have seen major internal turbulence within Aave, one of DeFi’s most successful DAOs. The Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a core governance team, announced it would cease operations and exit the ecosystem on March 3, following the departure of BGD Labs, the development team behind Aave V3, just two weeks earlier. The crisis stems from governance disputes that began in December, when Aave Labs unilaterally switched the protocol’s front-end aggregator from ParaSwap to CoW Swap, redirecting fee revenue from the DAO treasury to Aave Labs. In response, Aave Labs proposed the bundled “Aave Will Win” proposal in February, requesting $51M in funding for V4 development in exchange for routing all future product revenue to the DAO and phasing out V3. ACI strongly criticized the proposal, alleging that a significant portion of supporting votes came from addresses linked to Aave Labs, raising concerns about self-dealing and lack of transparency. Despite ACI’s attempts to introduce stricter accountability measures, their proposals were not adopted. The departures of both BGD Labs and ACI—key contributors responsible for technical development and governance—raise serious questions about Aave’s future, including technical risks associated with transitioning to V4 and the centralization of decision-making power. The situation highlights broader challenges in DAO governance, where power often remains concentrated among founders, developers despite the ideal of decentralized token-holder control. Moving forward, the resolution of the “Aave Will Win” proposal and the possibility of a protocol fork remain critical points to watch. How Aave addresses its governance flaws and rebalances power among stakeholders may determine its ability to sustain long-term growth.

比推03/03 23:09

Core 'Key Contributors' Depart One After Another, Has Aave's DAO Dream Shattered?

比推03/03 23:09

活动图片