# Сопутствующие статьи по теме FOMO

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "FOMO", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Retail Investors Are Not the Noise of the Market, But the Main Melody

The article challenges the conventional hierarchy of market difficulty, arguing that retail-driven markets like Crypto and meme stocks, often dismissed as "simple," actually offer higher returns due to their predictable emotional dynamics, not despite them. The author’s key shift was moving from asking "How much expertise does this market require?" to "What determines price in this market?" In retail-dominated markets, price is not set by fundamentals but by collective sentiment. This isn't a flaw but the core mechanism—retailers are not market "noise" but the main driver, creating powerful feedback loops of buying (FOMO) and selling (panic) known as reflexivity. Unlike institutional markets (e.g., U.S. stocks) where valuation models and arbitrage limit moves,散户 markets lack these anchors, allowing emotions to drive massive, predictable cycles: from ignorance and curiosity to FOMO,狂热, panic, and despair. This emotional trajectory is more reliable than forecasting fundamentals. Consequently, these high-volatility markets offer significant opportunities on both the long side (as sentiment turns positive) and the short side (after peak euphoria). The playing field is level; success depends on understanding human psychology, not deep research or insider information. The ultimate insight is to stop seeking "value" and start following the predictable certainty of crowd sentiment.

marsbit02/02 06:38

Retail Investors Are Not the Noise of the Market, But the Main Melody

marsbit02/02 06:38

Why Do Bitcoin and Ethereum Fall But Not Rise?

This article analyzes why Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) have underperformed other risk assets like stocks and commodities recently, despite a generally bullish macro environment. The core argument is that the underperformance is not primarily a macro issue, but a result of the crypto market's own structural dynamics and its ongoing deleveraging cycle. Key reasons identified include: - The crypto market is in the late stages of a deleveraging process, which began with a sharp sell-off in October, wiping out highly-leveraged speculative capital (especially from retail traders) and making the market fragile and risk-averse. - A significant amount of retail capital has been diverted to other booming assets like AI-related stocks and precious metals, which are experiencing their own FOMO-driven rallies. - Crypto markets remain structurally isolated from traditional finance (TradFi), with barriers to capital flow between them. - The market is still dominated by retail traders and passive funds (like ETFs), making it susceptible to emotional narratives, market micro-structure manipulation, and high volatility amplified by the use of high leverage (10x-20x) by散户. This creates an environment where concentrated selling in low-liquidity hours can trigger cascading liquidations. - The author draws historical parallels to the deleveraging of China's A-share market in 2015 and compares ETH's current price action to Tesla's in 2024, suggesting both are in a prolonged consolidation phase after a bubble. The article concludes that labeling BTC and ETH purely as "risk assets" is an oversimplification. While they are volatile, they also possess safe-haven qualities. The current sensitivity to negative news and sluggish response to positive developments is a temporary structural phenomenon of the deleveraging cycle, not a failure of their long-term value proposition. Once deleveraging concludes and new capital returns, this dynamic is expected to change.

marsbit01/30 04:44

Why Do Bitcoin and Ethereum Fall But Not Rise?

marsbit01/30 04:44

White House Ignites, BSC Spreads Like Wildfire: A Meme Carnival Bidding Farewell to the 'Imperial Decree Model'

A meme coin frenzy erupted on January 21 after the White House posted on X mentioning "victory, eviction, and memes." Within minutes, meme tokens named "memes" were launched on both Solana and BSC chains. Contrary to expectations, the Solana version—typically favored due to its active ecosystem and "first is first" advantage—was outperformed by the BSC version. At its peak, the BSC meme reached a market cap of $28 million with 7,300 holders, while Solana’s version peaked at $3.6 million with 3,900 holders. Real-time user engagement also favored BSC, with nearly 3,000 simultaneous online participants compared to Solana’s sub-1,000. This outcome challenges the long-standing perception that BSC meme coins rely heavily on endorsements from Binance founders CZ and He Yi—a model often mockingly referred to as "Shandong style." Both CZ and He Yi have recently publicly discouraged the practice of creating meme coins based on parsing words from their social posts. CZ explicitly warned followers against buying tokens inspired by his tweets, while He Yi criticized “word-parsing” and “bootlicking” behaviors, urging the community to focus on real project development instead. The surprising success of the BSC memes token—launched 20 minutes after Solana’s version—suggests a possible shift in BSC’s meme culture, moving away from top-down influence toward more organic, community-driven momentum. Whether this marks a lasting change in BSC’s meme ecosystem remains an open question.

marsbit01/21 09:47

White House Ignites, BSC Spreads Like Wildfire: A Meme Carnival Bidding Farewell to the 'Imperial Decree Model'

marsbit01/21 09:47

活动图片