# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Cryptography

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Cryptography", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Bitcoin’s Quantum Debate Heats Up As Adam Back Challenges Nic Carter

Blockstream CEO Adam Back publicly criticized Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter for his support of Project Eleven, a startup focused on protecting crypto assets from quantum computing threats. Back argued that Bitcoin developers are already researching quantum risks quietly and called Carter’s public warnings "uninformed noise" that causes confusion rather than useful action. He believes the quantum threat is decades away. Carter defended his position, stating he became deeply concerned after discussions with Project Eleven’s CEO and disclosed his financial stake in the project. He warned that governments are preparing for a post-quantum era and called Bitcoin a high-value target if its cryptography remains unchanged. Experts are divided on the timeline. Some, like Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards, warn the threat could emerge in as little as 2-9 years. Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin cited models showing a 20% chance of quantum computers breaking modern cryptography before 2030, with a median forecast of 2040. Others, including investor Kevin O’Leary, doubt attacking Bitcoin would be a priority for quantum technology. The debate highlights a split in the crypto community over the urgency of the quantum threat and the value of public warnings.

bitcoinist12/21 04:32

Bitcoin’s Quantum Debate Heats Up As Adam Back Challenges Nic Carter

bitcoinist12/21 04:32

Adam Back slams Bitcoiner VC for ‘uninformed noise’ about quantum risk

Blockstream CEO Adam Back criticized Castle Island Ventures' Nic Carter for amplifying concerns about quantum computing threats to Bitcoin, calling it "uninformed noise." Carter defended his firm's investment in quantum-resistant startup Project Eleven, stating he was "quantum pilled" and believes Bitcoin is vulnerable. He argues governments are preparing for quantum risks and Bitcoin is a "bug bounty" for quantum attacks. While some, like Capriole Investments' Charles Edwards, warn the threat could emerge in 2-9 years, Back contends quantum technology is still decades away from being a real threat. Others, like Kevin O’Leary, doubt attacking Bitcoin would be a practical use of quantum computing.

cointelegraph12/20 05:22

Adam Back slams Bitcoiner VC for ‘uninformed noise’ about quantum risk

cointelegraph12/20 05:22

Cardano Enters New Phase, Hoskinson Touts ‘ChatGPT For Privacy’

Charles Hoskinson announced that Cardano is entering a new phase centered on Midnight, a project he describes as a "ChatGPT for privacy." Midnight is positioned as a cross-ecosystem application layer designed to make advanced cryptography usable at scale, enabling privacy-first hybrid applications that can integrate with Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin, and other chains. Hoskinson emphasized that Midnight is not merely a privacy coin but a platform for selective disclosure, intents, dual tokenomics, and multi-resource consensus, targeting real-world applications capable of handling trillions in transactions. He highlighted Midnight's early traction, citing a $1 billion market cap and $1.8 billion trading volume, attributing this success to a fair distribution model that allocated tokens to 1.5 million users rather than venture capitalists. Hoskinson argued that Cardano can differentiate itself by prioritizing privacy-enabled financial primitives like private DEXs and prediction markets, rather than competing solely on transaction cost. He outlined plans to roll out Midnight across major ecosystems in 2026, aiming to unify crypto markets and eliminate the distinction between DeFi and TradFi.

bitcoinist12/19 21:02

Cardano Enters New Phase, Hoskinson Touts ‘ChatGPT For Privacy’

bitcoinist12/19 21:02

Blockchains quietly prepare for quantum threat as Bitcoin debates timeline

Blockchains are increasingly preparing for the potential threat of quantum computers, which could eventually break current cryptographic systems. While quantum machines capable of attacking networks like Bitcoin are still years away, several major blockchains—including Aptos and Solana—are proactively testing quantum-resistant upgrades. Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin has emphasized the importance of early preparation, estimating a 20% chance of relevant quantum computing breakthroughs by 2030. Bitcoin, however, remains divided. Some developers and industry leaders dismiss near-term quantum risks as premature and fear such discussions may cause unnecessary panic or market instability. In contrast, investors and researchers argue that ignoring a low-probability, high-impact risk undermines long-term confidence. The debate reflects broader tensions around how Bitcoin should communicate and prepare for future threats without destabilizing its present security assumptions.

cointelegraph12/19 13:46

Blockchains quietly prepare for quantum threat as Bitcoin debates timeline

cointelegraph12/19 13:46

Aptos introduces post-quantum signatures before they’re urgently needed

Aptos is advancing a proposal to introduce post-quantum digital signatures as an optional security upgrade, addressing growing concerns that future quantum computers could eventually break current cryptographic systems. The Aptos Improvement Proposal AIP-137 would integrate the SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) signature scheme at the account level, making Aptos one of the first major blockchains to natively support quantum-resistant accounts. Existing accounts would remain unchanged, and adoption would be opt-in. This move reflects broader industry attention to quantum risks, with other networks like Solana also testing quantum-resistant solutions. While some in the crypto space, including Bitcoin pioneers, view the quantum threat as distant or overhyped, Aptos and others are taking proactive steps to prepare for a post-quantum era.

cointelegraph12/18 16:42

Aptos introduces post-quantum signatures before they’re urgently needed

cointelegraph12/18 16:42

Bitcoiners push for quantum-resistant BIP-360 upgrade as debate heats up

A group of Bitcoin advocates and fund managers is urging the network to accelerate the adoption of quantum-resistant cryptography, citing BIP-360 as a potential solution. Proponents like Charles Edwards of Capriole warn that a significant portion of Bitcoin could be vulnerable to quantum attacks within years and argue for a migration deadline by 2028. However, critics including Adam Back of Blockstream dismiss these concerns as premature, stating quantum threats are “decades away” and emphasizing that Bitcoin doesn’t rely on encryption vulnerable to near-term quantum breaks. Debate continues as Taproot adoption declines, possibly reflecting user anxiety, while alternative quantum-resistant signature schemes like hash-based proposals from Blockstream Research gain attention.

cointelegraph12/18 12:21

Bitcoiners push for quantum-resistant BIP-360 upgrade as debate heats up

cointelegraph12/18 12:21

a16z's 10,000-Word Essay (Part 1): The Misunderstood 'Quantum Supremacy', You Don't Need to Panic Until 2030

The article clarifies misconceptions about "quantum supremacy" and argues that cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQC) capable of breaking classical encryption (e.g., via Shor's algorithm) are unlikely to emerge before 2030. It distinguishes between post-quantum encryption and signatures, emphasizing that encryption requires immediate migration due to "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" (HNDL) attacks, where adversaries store encrypted data for future decryption. In contrast, post-quantum signatures are less urgency, as they are not vulnerable to HNDL—past signatures remain secure even after CRQC emergence. The article critiques exaggerated claims about quantum progress, noting that current hardware lacks the scale, fidelity, and error correction needed for CRQC. It also highlights that zkSNARKs, like signatures, are not susceptible to HNDL attacks. Migration strategies should prioritize encryption while adopting a measured approach for signatures to avoid unnecessary costs and risks.

marsbit12/12 06:20

a16z's 10,000-Word Essay (Part 1): The Misunderstood 'Quantum Supremacy', You Don't Need to Panic Until 2030

marsbit12/12 06:20

From Principles to the Future: How Quantum Computing Reshapes the Security Landscape of Blockchain

Summary: This article analyzes the real quantum computing threat to blockchain, arguing timelines for cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) are often exaggerated. While "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" (HNDL) attacks necessitate an immediate shift to post-quantum encryption for long-term data secrecy, the transition for digital signatures is less urgent as they are not vulnerable to HNDL attacks. Most blockchains (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum) primarily use signatures, not encryption, so they face the threat of future signature forgery, not immediate decryption. However, Bitcoin requires urgent planning due to its slow governance, the need for active user migration of funds, and the risk of losing billions in vulnerable, possibly abandoned coins. Privacy chains with encrypted on-chain data are more immediate HNDL targets. The article cautions against a rushed adoption of immature post-quantum signatures (which are larger and riskier to implement) and zkSNARKs, advising a measured approach. It recommends immediate deployment of hybrid encryption, planning for blockchain migration, prioritizing implementation security (bugs are a bigger near-term risk than quantum computers), and maintaining perspective on quantum computing announcements.

比推12/10 09:34

From Principles to the Future: How Quantum Computing Reshapes the Security Landscape of Blockchain