# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Crypto

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Crypto", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Institutional Dominance in the Crypto Market: The End of Decentralization or the Dawn of a New Era?

In 2025, institutional investors now account for approximately 95% of cryptocurrency inflows, while retail participation has declined to just 5–6%, marking a structural shift in the market. According to Aishwary Gupta of Polygon Labs, this transition is driven by maturing infrastructure rather than sentiment. Major asset managers like BlackRock and Apollo are allocating portions of their portfolios to digital assets via ETFs and on-chain tokenized products, leveraging blockchain for yield generation and operational efficiency. Gupta highlights that institutional adoption is progressing in two phases: first, through yield-bearing products like tokenized treasuries and regulated staking, and second, via efficiency gains such as faster settlement and programmable assets. While retail interest waned due to meme coin losses, he expects gradual return as more transparent, regulated products emerge. Addressing concerns about centralization, Gupta argues that institutional involvement can enhance blockchain’s without compromising decentralization, provided infrastructure remains open. He envisions a future financial system where DeFi, NFTs, and traditional assets coexist on public chains. Although compliance may limit some experimentation, it fosters more sustainable innovation. Increased institutional participation is expected to reduce volatility and accelerate growth in areas like real-world asset tokenization and cross-chain interoperability. Ultimately, this trend signifies crypto’s evolution from a speculative asset to a core component of global finance.

marsbit12/11 09:15

Institutional Dominance in the Crypto Market: The End of Decentralization or the Dawn of a New Era?

marsbit12/11 09:15

Strategy Takes a Hard Line Against MSCI: The Ultimate Defense of DAT

In a significant industry clash, digital asset treasury company Strategy has issued a forceful 12-page public letter to MSCI opposing its proposal to exclude companies with over 50% digital asset holdings from its global investable market indices. Strategy argues the move is discriminatory, misleading, and threatens billions in capital flow, potentially causing up to $2.8 billion in passive outflows from its stock alone. The company defends its business model, asserting that digital asset treasuries (DATs) are operational companies—not passive funds—with active strategies like issuing digital debt instruments to fund Bitcoin acquisitions and generate shareholder returns. It compares its role to historic infrastructure builders like Standard Oil and AT&T, emphasizing Bitcoin’s transformative potential in finance. Strategy highlights four key objections: the proposal is arbitrarily discriminatory against digital assets; it violates index providers' neutrality principles; it is impractical due to Bitcoin's volatility and accounting disparities; and it contradicts the U.S. government’s pro-digital asset strategy. The firm demands MSCI withdraw the proposal or extend consultations. Backed by industry advocates and data showing over 200 public companies hold more than 5% of Bitcoin’s supply, Strategy urges MSCI to let markets—not biased rules—determine the value of digital asset companies. The decision, expected by January 2026, could redefine the role of crypto-native firms in traditional finance.

深潮12/11 08:38

Strategy Takes a Hard Line Against MSCI: The Ultimate Defense of DAT

深潮12/11 08:38

Institutions Are Taking Over the Crypto Market: Is This the End of Decentralization, or the Prelude to a New Cycle?

The cryptocurrency market is undergoing a structural shift in 2025, with institutional investors now accounting for approximately 95% of capital inflows, while retail participation has declined to 5–6%. According to Aishwary Gupta of Polygon Labs, this transition is driven by maturing infrastructure rather than market sentiment. Major asset managers like BlackRock, Apollo, and Hamilton Lane are allocating portions of their portfolios to digital assets via ETFs and on-chain tokenized products, leveraging public blockchains that meet traditional finance compliance standards. Key drivers include yield generation through tokenized treasuries and institutional staking, followed by efficiency gains from faster settlements, shared liquidity, and programmable assets. While retail investors retreated due to losses from meme coin cycles, Gupta believes they will return as more regulated and transparent products emerge. He argues that institutional involvement does not undermine decentralization; instead, it enhances legitimacy and fosters a hybrid financial ecosystem where DeFi, NFTs, and traditional assets coexist on public chains. Although increased compliance may limit some experimentation, it promotes more sustainable innovation. Looking ahead, institutional liquidity is expected to reduce market volatility and accelerate the growth of real-world asset tokenization and cross-chain interoperability infrastructure. This evolution signals crypto’s transition from a speculative asset to a core component of the global financial system.

比推12/11 07:22

Institutions Are Taking Over the Crypto Market: Is This the End of Decentralization, or the Prelude to a New Cycle?

比推12/11 07:22

Rebuttal: I Don't Regret Spending 8 Years in the Crypto Industry

Ken Chang recently wrote an article lamenting his eight years in crypto as a waste, describing the industry as inherently destructive and a system of financial nihilism that has built the world's largest casino. While many in the space dismiss such critiques, the author acknowledges that Ken’s disillusionment—shared by earlier figures like Mike Hearn—stems from a genuine idealistic disappointment. Crypto promised decentralization and a new financial system but largely delivered speculation and gambling. The author identifies five core aspirations of cryptocurrency: restoring sound money, encoding business logic via smart contracts, making digital property real, improving capital market efficiency, and expanding global financial inclusion. While progress has been made in areas like Bitcoin, stablecoins, and certain efficient financial infrastructures, many grand visions—like overthrowing fiat or revolutionizing digital ownership—remain unfulfilled. The author advocates for a "pragmatic optimism." Speculation and casino-like dynamics are seen as unfortunate but inevitable side effects of building permissionless, open financial infrastructure. The key is to focus on the real, albeit gradual, progress—such as improved financial access and inclusion—while accepting that transformative change is slow and often captured by incremental efficiency gains, not revolution. The goal remains worthy, even if the path is messier than hoped.

marsbit12/11 06:04

Rebuttal: I Don't Regret Spending 8 Years in the Crypto Industry

marsbit12/11 06:04

活动图片