Solana: 67% of total supply now staked – SOL price squeeze possible IF…

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-23Обновлено 2026-02-23

Введение

Solana has entered a decisive phase with 67% of its total supply now staked, reflecting strong long-term holder conviction and reducing immediate selling pressure. This staking level enhances network security and creates structural supply scarcity. Additionally, treasury companies hold over $1.3 billion in SOL, further tightening circulating supply. These factors signal strong strategic confidence in Solana’s infrastructure. The combination of constrained supply and potential rising demand could amplify price movements, pending broader market stability and macroeconomic clarity.

Solana remained one of the market’s most watched altcoins, drawing sustained attention from Wall Street and global investors.

On the 23rd of February, sentiment around the network shifted.

On-chain data showed Solana Staking continued expanding.

At the same time, Treasury Companies increased strategic allocations. Circulating supply tightened as more tokens moved into long-term holdings.

That shift moved the conversation beyond short-term price action. Liquidity compression emerged as the dominant theme. When supply contracts at scale, structural implications follow.

Conviction appeared established. What remained was broader market strength and clearer macro direction. If liquidity returned, the setup could respond quickly.

67% of Solana’s total supply is now staked

Solana [SOL] entered a decisive phase as 67% of its supply sat in Staking. That number was aggressive. It reflected long-term holders refusing to release control.

High Staking strengthened network security and reduced reflex selling pressure. Holding and staking showed patience over speculation. In particular, the dominance of committed participants shifted supply power away from short-term traders.

This was not surface-level optimism. It was structural discipline. When tokens lock up at this scale, scarcity stops being theoretical.

Moreover, reduced liquid supply historically amplified market moves once demand accelerated. The setup was clear. Supply became tighter than headlines suggested.

Treasury companies hold over $1.3B in SOL

At the same time, Treasury Companies held more than $1.3 billion worth of SOL through deliberate allocations.

Millions of tokens effectively exited active circulation, further tightening supply alongside elevated Staking levels.

Moreover, treasury control signaled strategic positioning and long-term confidence in Solana’s infrastructure trajectory.

What does this mean for Solana’s long-term future?

Solana’s position strengthened as supply tightened. Scarcity improved the overall setup, while demand remained the real driver.

The market simply waited for macro stability and a clearer direction.

If adoption kept expanding while supply stayed constrained, pressure could build steadily. The moment felt pivotal. Conviction locked the supply in place. Now, growth just needs broader stability to amplify it.


Final Summary

  • 67% of Solana’s Total Supply was locked in Staking as of 23 February 2026.
  • Treasury Companies reportedly held over $1.3 billion worth of SOL.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat percentage of Solana's total supply was staked as of the article's date, and why is this significant?

A67% of Solana's total supply was staked as of 23 February. This is significant because it reflects long-term holder conviction, strengthens network security, reduces immediate selling pressure, and creates structural supply scarcity that can amplify price moves when demand increases.

QHow much SOL do Treasury Companies hold, and what is the implication of this?

ATreasury Companies hold over $1.3 billion worth of SOL. This means millions of tokens are removed from active trading, further tightening the circulating supply and signaling long-term strategic confidence in Solana's future.

QAccording to the article, what are the two main factors that have caused a tightening of Solana's circulating supply?

AThe two main factors are the high rate of staking (67% of total supply) and the large strategic allocations being held by Treasury Companies, both of which lock up supply and reduce the number of tokens available for trading.

QWhat does the article state is the 'real driver' for Solana's price, despite the improved scarcity setup?

AThe article states that demand is the real driver for Solana's price. While scarcity from staking and treasury holdings improves the market setup, actual price movement depends on the return of demand and broader market strength.

QWhat two broader market conditions does the article suggest are needed to amplify Solana's potential price movement?

AThe article suggests that broader market strength and a clearer macro direction are needed. If liquidity returns to the market and there is more stability, the constrained supply setup could respond quickly to increased demand.

Похожее

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit43 мин. назад

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit43 мин. назад

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit44 мин. назад

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit44 мин. назад

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit54 мин. назад

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit54 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片