Senator Lummis pushes for CLARITY Act, calls it ‘best thing to happen to DeFi community’

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-04-02Обновлено 2026-04-02

Введение

Senator Cynthia Lummis advocates for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, calling it the "best thing to happen to the DeFi community." She argues the legislation would provide legal certainty and a "safe harbor" for developers, validators, and node operators, ensuring American innovation remains in the U.S. However, this optimism contrasts with Polymarket's prediction market, where the act's odds of passage are only 49%, reflecting broader market uncertainty. This skepticism may stem from ongoing disagreements between the White House and crypto entities like Coinbase. Concurrently, stablecoin infrastructure is evolving. The Better Money Company, backed by A16z crypto, is developing a "stablecoin clearinghouse" to simplify the use of multiple stablecoins across different blockchains. This development follows the passage of the GENIUS Act in 2025, which streamlined stablecoin regulations. Visa's on-chain analytics report a massive $72.3 trillion in stablecoin transaction volume over the past year, with USDC recently outpacing USDT in monthly transaction volume.

The hype around the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is increasing day by day. Senator Cynthia Lummis is the latest to lend some fresh optimism to the ongoing discussion around yield generations, with the Senator claiming that the CLARITY Act is the “best thing that could happen to the DeFi community.”

This is evidence of how even big officials can see the ongoing uncertainty surrounding regulations that are coming up in the way of actual growth of the crypto ecosystem. Hence, by pushing demand for the passage of the CLARITY Act, Lummis believes that this would finally give the crypto community “the legal certainty they deserve”.

Lummis also stressed on the seriousness of the situation as she explained how this proposed law is a one-pot solution to “developers, validators, and node operators.”

Once approved, this Act would provide “a safe harbor” and also “ensure American innovation stays right here on U.S soil.”

Polymarket odds are painting a negative picture

However, this optimism is in contrast to Polymarket odds. At the time of writing, they sat at 49%, even below the neutral level – A sign that the broader market is still unsure about the passage of the Act.

Source: Polymarket

This might be due to the series of disagreements between the White House and Coinbase.

On the contrary, others like the Better Money Company, a stablecoin infrastructure firm, are aiming to build “the next era of money”.

The current situation of the stablecoin market is such that different stablecoins exist across multiple blockchains, issuers, and platforms. And, they often require manual, costly conversions and sometimes even trading at slight value differences.

Finding the missing piece

Hence, to remove this roadblock, The Better Money Company is aiming to build “a stablecoin clearinghouse.” Under this plan, the firm will simplify how developers and businesses integrate stablecoins, enabling them to send, receive, and use multiple stablecoins as if they were one consistent form of money.

With A16z crypto investing in the startup, the plan is simply to develop the “critical missing connectivity layer” required to make the stablecoin ecosystem function effectively.

Other developments in and around stablecoins

All this is happening along the heels of the GENIUS Act that was passed in 2025, making stablecoin regulations seamless.

In the meantime, the total transaction volume of stablecoins hit a count of $72.3 trillion in the last 12 months, as per Visa’s on-chain analytics.

Source: Visa on-chain analytics

That’s not all either as data also revealed that USDC has been outpacing USDT lately. In fact, until last year, most months saw USDT ruling the transaction volume. However, things seem to have changed since 2026.


Final Summary

  • Despite growing optimism from the likes of Senator Cynthia Lummis, Polymarket odds remain below par.
  • Firms like Better Money Company now stepping in with new stablecoin plans.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and why does Senator Lummis support it?

AThe CLARITY Act refers to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025. Senator Lummis supports it because she believes it will provide the DeFi community with 'the legal certainty they deserve,' act as a one-pot solution for developers, validators, and node operators, provide a 'safe harbor,' and ensure American innovation stays in the U.S.

QAccording to the article, what do the current Polymarket odds suggest about the Act's passage?

AThe current Polymarket odds, sitting at 49% (below the neutral level), suggest that the broader market is still unsure about the passage of the CLARITY Act.

QWhat problem is The Better Money Company aiming to solve with its 'stablecoin clearinghouse'?

AThe Better Money Company aims to solve the problem of different stablecoins existing across multiple blockchains, issuers, and platforms, which often require manual, costly conversions and can trade at slight value differences. Their clearinghouse would simplify integration, allowing users to send, receive, and use multiple stablecoins as one consistent form of money.

QWhat significant development in stablecoin regulation preceded the events in this article?

AThe GENIUS Act, which was passed in 2025 and made stablecoin regulations seamless, preceded the events discussed in the article.

QWhat does the data from Visa's on-chain analytics reveal about stablecoin transaction volume and the performance of USDC vs. USDT?

AVisa's on-chain analytics revealed that the total transaction volume of stablecoins was $72.3 trillion in the last 12 months. The data also showed that USDC has been outpacing USDT lately, a change from previous years where USDT typically ruled the transaction volume.

Похожее

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit54 мин. назад

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit54 мин. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить HYPE

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Hyperliquid (HYPE) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Hyperliquid (HYPE).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Hyperliquid (HYPE)После приобретения вами Hyperliquid (HYPE) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Hyperliquid (HYPE)С легкостью торгуйте Hyperliquid (HYPE) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

414 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.12.11Обновлено 2026.04.23

Как купить HYPE

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на HYPE (HYPE) представлены ниже.

活动图片