Narrative Collapse, Trust Reset to Zero: Trove Kicks Off This Year's Crypto Rights Protection Campaign

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-19Обновлено 2026-01-19

Введение

Trove, a Perp DEX platform that claimed to tokenize and trade illiquid collectibles like trading cards and luxury watches, has collapsed amid allegations of fraud and insider manipulation. The project initially built momentum with high-profile partnerships and a $20M+ HYPE token acquisition, leading to a successful $11.5M ICO. However, the team abruptly extended then reversed the ICO timeline, enabling insider betting on prediction markets like Polymarket. Soon after, Trove abandoned its original blockchain, Hyperliquid, and attempted to dump millions in HYPE tokens. Investigations revealed undisclosed payments to influencers, preferential investment terms for insiders, and false public statements. With trust shattered and legal risks under MiCA regulations mounting, Trove’s token is expected to crash at launch, marking a severe breach of trust in the crypto community.

Trove once had a perfect narrative.

As a Perp DEX targeting collectibles and RWA, Trove claimed to be able to transform illiquid "cultural assets," such as Pokémon cards, CSGO skins, and luxury items like high-end watches, into tradable financial assets, providing a hedging venue for collectors.

However, within just ten days, the Trove team staged a farce through a series of astonishing operations. In the process, they emptied the pockets of onlookers.

Bait

At the end of October last year, Trove founder @unwisecap discussed the concept of "Everything Can Be Perped" in several articles and announced that Trove would be built based on HIP-3, building up the community's anticipation.

Over the following month, Trove successively announced collaborations with Kalshi and CARDS (Collector_Crypt), receiving official Twitter replies as "endorsements" from these well-known project teams (P.S. As of the time of writing, Kalshi had already completed the "cutting off," deleting their reply under Trove's official tweet).

In mid-December, Trove announced that it had spent over $20 million to acquire 500,000 HYPE tokens to meet the integration requirements of HIP-3. Shortly after, the testnet points program was launched, and the trading volume on the platform exceeded $1 million within two weeks. Everything seemed to be progressing as expected. Until...

A Textbook Case of Insider Trading

On January 6th, Trove suddenly announced an ICO with a $20 million FDV. The public sale adopted an "oversubscription" model, offering priority allocation rights to points holders. Accompanied by concentrated promotions from a group of KOLs sporting Trove badges, Trove successfully raised $11.5 million, oversubscribed by 4.6 times.

At this point, with less than two hours left until the ICO deadline, the probability of the "Trove ICO total fundraising amount greater than $20 million" prediction market on Polymarket had approached zero.

The real show began shortly after. The team suddenly broke the rules, announcing an extension of the ICO by five days to ensure fair allocation. The "YES" option on Polymarket instantly skyrocketed from the bottom to nearly 60%. Insider funds were clearly a step ahead; on-chain data showed that specific wallets placed precise bets before the announcement was made and quickly exited after the price surge.

Perhaps deeming the liquidity of the prediction market insufficient to satisfy their appetite, and amidst a wave of community skepticism, the Trove team seized the opportunity to stage a dramatic "crying wolf" scenario: they announced the withdrawal of the extension decision, ending the ICO as originally planned.

Following this announcement, the corresponding market directly zeroed out and settled. Polymarket data indicated that related wallets had placed precise bets before the news was released and continued to profit from the subsequent reversal.

The Great Retreat

On January 17th, Trove suddenly announced it was abandoning Hyperliquid and would instead issue its token on Solana. For a project that had been fundraising under the banner of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, this was nothing short of pulling the rug out from under everyone.

Simultaneously, on-chain detective MLM caught the Trove team using a timed sell function, attempting to sell half of their HYPE tokens within 40 minutes.

Choosing to sell tens of millions worth of tokens in 40 minutes on a weekend, during the lowest trading volume, showed the Trove team was truly desperate.

Faced with质疑 (queries/doubt), the explanation provided by the Trove team seemed feeble: "The backers got nervous and decided to exit." However, on-chain transaction records showed these sell-offs were conducted simultaneously while the team was publicly denying "we are selling tokens."

This inconsistency between words and actions彻底击穿了 (completely shattered) the community's trust底线 (bottom line). As trust collapsed, more shady details were uncovered.

Renowned on-chain detective ZachXBT disclosed that the Trove team paid @TJRTrades a hefty marketing fee of $45,000, directly depositing it into the KOL's online gambling site top-up address.

KOL @hrithikk stated that the Trove team not only provided KOLs with substantial marketing fees but also privately offered ICO allocations at valuations as low as $8.5 million, a discount of up to 60%, accompanied by huge airdrop rewards. Trove is still selling shares at low prices and has contacted him over 5 times asking if he would invest in Trove.

Trove's TGE is scheduled for January 20th at 1:00 AM Beijing Time. The prediction market on Polymarket shows, based on the pre-sale valuation, a 90% probability that the TROVE token will fall below its issuance price.

The good news is that this farce might not end with a simple "Soft Rug." Trove had previously claimed on its official website to comply with EU MiCA regulations. Now, facing accusations of false advertising and potential fraud, angry investors have every reason to initiate civil lawsuits based on MiCA provisions.

The bad news is, as revealed in chat screenshots by a KOL, team members appear to be from Iran.

The Hyperliquid ecosystem is known for its strong community cohesion, but this atmosphere of abundant trust also provides fertile ground for scammers to thrive.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was Trove's original value proposition and narrative before its controversial actions?

ATrove was a Perp DEX for collectibles and RWA that claimed to convert illiquid 'cultural assets' like Pokémon cards, CSGO skins, and luxury watches into tradable financial assets, providing a hedging venue for collectors.

QWhat key event on January 6th marked the beginning of Trove's 'insider trading textbook' scandal?

AOn January 6th, Trove announced an ICO with a $20 million FDV using an 'oversubscription' model, but then suddenly extended the ICO by 5 days after it was nearly complete, allowing insiders to profit on prediction markets like Polymarket with prior knowledge.

QWhat action did Trove take on January 17th that completely shattered community trust and was described as 'pulling the rug from the cauldron'?

AOn January 17th, Trove abruptly announced it was abandoning the Hyperliquid blockchain to issue its token on Solana instead, despite having fundraised under the Hyperliquid ecosystem, and was caught attempting to dump its HYPE tokens in a short time frame.

QAccording to on-chain detectives, what evidence exposed Trove's unethical practices regarding influencer marketing and private allocations?

AZachXBT revealed Trove paid a KOL $45,000 for marketing to a gambling site deposit address, and KOL @hrithikk disclosed that the team offered private ICO allocations at a 60% discount ($8.5M valuation vs. public $20M) with massive airdrop bonuses.

QWhat potential legal repercussions does Trove face according to the article, and what complicating factor was mentioned?

AInvestors could file civil lawsuits under EU's MiCA regulations for false advertising and potential fraud, but a complicating factor is that team members are allegedly from Iran, which may hinder legal action.

Похожее

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News5 мин. назад

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News5 мин. назад

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbit24 мин. назад

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbit24 мин. назад

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbit31 мин. назад

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbit31 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片