Micron Invests $24 Billion in Singapore Factory, But Your RAM Sticks Are Not in the Plan

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-27Обновлено 2026-01-27

Введение

Micron announces a $24 billion investment to build an advanced NAND wafer fabrication plant in Singapore, with production starting in late 2028. This follows a previous $7 billion investment in a high-bandwidth memory (HBM) advanced packaging facility at the same site, bringing total new investments in Singapore to over $30 billion. The move comes as Micron shifts its focus toward AI-driven demand and away from consumer products, having recently discontinued its Crucial consumer brand, which sold retail memory modules and SSDs. The strategic pivot is driven by surging demand from AI and data centers. Micron’s HBM revenue reached $1.98 billion in Q3 FY2025, with full-year 2026 HBM supply already sold out. The company predicts the HBM market will grow to around $100 billion by 2028, surpassing the entire DRAM market of 2024. In contrast, consumer memory market is lower-margin and highly competitive. This supply shift has contributed to significant price increases in consumer memory products, with DDR4 and DDR5 spot prices rising over 150% and 300% respectively in 2025. Although Samsung and SK Hynix have extended DDR4 production in response to soaring prices, overall supply remains tight. As AI continues to drive memory demand, consumer memory costs are expected to stay elevated.

Author: David, Shenchao TechFlow

At this time last year, a 16GB DDR4 RAM stick cost just over 200 RMB. Now, the same model is priced at 600 RMB, with some models even approaching 700 RMB.

The direct reason for the price increase is a tightening of supply. The three major memory giants have collectively shifted their production capacity towards the AI market. And Micron is the latest to lay its cards on the table.

On January 27, Micron Technology announced a $24 billion (approximately S$31 billion) investment to build an advanced NAND (flash memory) wafer fabrication plant in Singapore. The investment will be phased over 10 years, with shipments starting in the second half of 2028. Singapore's Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong attended the groundbreaking ceremony.

This is Micron's second major investment in Singapore.

In January 2025, Micron had already begun construction on a $7 billion HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) advanced packaging facility within the same campus, scheduled for production in 2027. Combined, these two projects represent over $30 billion in new investments by Micron in Singapore.

Image source: Lianhe Zaobao, photo by Tang Jiahong

Yet, this is the same company that just two months ago announced the shutdown of its 29-year-old Crucial consumer brand—the memory sticks and solid-state drives you can buy on JD.com and Taobao.

On one hand, spending billions to build factories; on the other, cutting the consumer business. Both point to the same clue: the demand for memory from AI remains high.

Capacity Reallocation After China Market Contraction

Micron's increased investment in Singapore has a clear geopolitical background.

In May 2023, China's Cyberspace Administration announced that Micron's products had not passed the cybersecurity review and required domestic critical information infrastructure operators to stop procurement. In 2018, the Chinese mainland market contributed 58% of Micron's revenue (approximately $17.36 billion); by fiscal year 2022, this had fallen to 10.8% (approximately $3.31 billion).

Production capacity needs a new outlet.

Currently, Micron already has three 3D NAND fabrication plants and several packaging and testing facilities in Singapore, employing about 9,000 people and producing 98% of Micron's flash memory chips.

Micron stated in its latest announcement that the HBM factory is expected to make a significant contribution to supply by 2027 and mentioned that as HBM becomes part of the Singapore manufacturing operations, "synergistic effects" in both NAND and DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory, the common memory chips) production are anticipated.

But the priority of this "synergy" is clear: HBM capacity for 2026 is completely sold out, data center customer demand cannot be fully met, and the consumer brand is being shut down simultaneously.

Within the same campus, consumer-grade production lines are making way for AI production lines.

The Business Logic of Exiting the Consumer Market

On December 3, 2025, Micron announced via its official website a complete exit from the Crucial consumer business, including the sales of RAM sticks and SSD (Solid State Drive) products through global retailers, e-commerce platforms, and distributors.

Shipments will continue until the end of February 2026, at which point this brand, founded in 1996, will bid farewell to the retail market.

In the statement, Micron's Executive Vice President, Sadana, stated that the surge in memory and storage demand driven by AI in data centers prompted Micron to make the "difficult decision" to exit the Crucial consumer business in order to more effectively supply and support large strategic customers in high-growth areas.

Data supports this judgment.

Micron's fiscal year 2025 third-quarter HBM product income reached $1.98 billion, with an annualized revenue close to $8 billion. According to TrendForce data, the unit price of HBM memory required for AI servers is about 8 times that of ordinary servers.

Micron predicts the HBM market size will grow from approximately $35 billion in 2025 to about $100 billion in 2028, by which time it will exceed the size of the entire DRAM market in 2024.

In contrast, consumer-grade storage is a business with thin profits and fierce competition.

Micron's exit means the world's major consumer DRAM manufacturers are reduced from three—Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron—to two.

The AI Rally of Memory Stocks

The capital market has already priced in this shift.

According to statistics from *National Business Daily*, memory stocks occupied the top four spots on the U.S. stock gainers list for the full year 2025:

SanDisk rose 577%, becoming the S&P 500's top performer for the year; Western Digital rose 281%; Micron rose 236%; Seagate rose 216%.

For comparison, Nvidia rose 39% in the same period, ranking 71st.

It was reported that tech giants like Google and Amazon presented Micron with "unlimited purchase demands" in October 2025. Micron CEO Mehrotra revealed on an earnings call that the company's entire HBM supply for 2026 is already sold out, and currently, it can only meet half to two-thirds of the demand from key customers.

Micron's latest financial report shows revenue of $13.6 billion for September-November 2025, a year-on-year increase of 57%, with DRAM revenue of $10.8 billion, up 69% year-on-year.

Consumer Side: Price Hikes May Continue

Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron had all previously announced plans to gradually phase out DDR4 production from late 2025 to early 2026. Micron issued an end-of-life notice for DDR4/LPDDR4 in June.

Although Samsung and SK Hynix later extended their DDR4 production plans to the end of 2026 due to soaring DDR4 prices, the overall trend of tightening supply remains unchanged.

The price reaction has been intense. According to TrendForce data, since 2025, the spot price of DDR5 memory chips has risen over 300%, while DDR4 has risen over 150%. DDR4 has even seen a "price inversion," with the price of some specifications exceeding that of DDR5.

ADATA Chairman Chen Libai also publicly stated that the comprehensive shortage and price increase across the four major storage categories—DRAM, NAND, SSD, HDD—is a situation he is witnessing for the first time in over thirty years in the industry.

If you want to add memory to your old computer or build a new desktop, the cost remains high. Because AI needs computing power, and computing power needs memory. Your old computer is probably still behind AI demand in the queue.

Memory stocks have risen, and memory stick prices have risen too.

One is an investment opportunity; the other is paying the bill for that opportunity.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhy did Micron announce the closure of its Crucial consumer brand?

AMicron closed its Crucial consumer brand to reallocate resources and supply to meet the surging demand for memory and storage from data centers and large strategic customers driven by AI, as the consumer market is less profitable and highly competitive.

QWhat is the total investment Micron is making in Singapore for new manufacturing facilities?

AMicron is investing a total of over $30 billion in Singapore, including $24 billion for a new NAND wafer fab and over $7 billion for an HBM advanced packaging plant.

QHow has the price of consumer memory modules changed recently according to the article?

AThe price of a 16GB DDR4 memory module has increased from over 200 yuan to about 600 yuan, with some models nearing 700 yuan, due to tightened supply and shifted production focus to AI.

QWhat percentage of Micron's revenue came from the Chinese market in 2022 compared to 2018?

AIn 2018, the Chinese market contributed 58% of Micron's revenue, but by the 2022 fiscal year, it had decreased to 10.8%.

QWhich storage-related stocks were the top performers in the U.S. stock market in 2025 according to the article?

AIn 2025, the top-performing U.S. storage stocks were SanDisk (up 577%), Western Digital (up 281%), Micron (up 236%), and Seagate (up 216%).

Похожее

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up a New Branch of Science

Summary: In an interview at Sequoia Capital's AI Ascent 2026, Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind, discusses the path to AGI and its future implications. He traces his journey from using games as AI testbeds to founding DeepMind with a clear mission: first, to solve intelligence and build AGI; second, to use it to tackle complex problems like science and medicine. Hassabis highlights AI's transformative potential in biology and drug discovery, where tools like AlphaFold could shorten development cycles from years to days, enabling personalized medicine. He envisions AI enabling high-fidelity simulations of complex systems (e.g., economics, biology), potentially birthing new scientific disciplines. Hassabis posits that information, not matter or energy, may be the universe's fundamental essence, making AI a profound tool for understanding reality. He defends classical Turing machines as sufficient for modeling even quantum-like problems and sees AGI primarily as a powerful instrument, with questions of consciousness to be explored later. Predicting AGI by 2030, he cites David Deutsch's "The Fabric of Reality" as essential post-AGI reading and names AlphaFold as his proudest achievement.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up a New Branch of Science

marsbit7 мин. назад

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit31 мин. назад

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit31 мин. назад

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit40 мин. назад

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit40 мин. назад

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1 ч. назад

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks