The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-12Обновлено 2026-05-12

Введение

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and pric...

Author: BlockBeats

Undoubtedly, the current main narrative within the Base ecosystem remains AI. To be more precise, it's "VVV."

Before introducing the tokens related to the "VVV" concept, let's first understand what "VVV" actually is.

What is the "VVV" Concept?

$VVV is the token of Venice, which is a privacy-first and censorship-resistant generative AI platform on the Base ecosystem, led by Erik Voorhees.

Erik is a seasoned OG in the crypto space since 2011, having played a pivotal role in early Bitcoin adoption. After the Mt.Gox collapse, he founded ShapeShift, one of the first platforms to emphasize non-custodial and privacy-first trading. His expertise in decentralized finance and user sovereignty makes him a strong advocate for permissionless AI.

According to the Venice API user statistics chart disclosed by Erik Voorhees in March, Venice's API user count grew from near zero to 15,000 throughout 2025.

However, the corresponding price performance of $VVV has been lukewarm, with occasional rebounds reaching only about a $200 million market cap at most. It once fell below a $45 million market cap, far from its all-time high of nearly $1 billion when it first launched.

It's also noticeable that entering 2026, Venice's API user count experienced rapid growth. This has to be credited to the explosion of OpenClaw. Due to its privacy-focused positioning, Venice was prominently recommended in the model provider section of OpenClaw's official documentation.

Although this prominent recommendation was later removed, 2026 has been a year of rapid growth for Venice. According to data disclosed by Erik Voorhees, by March this year, Venice's total user count exceeded 2 million, paid subscription users reached 55,000, monthly revenue hit $835,000, with a monthly growth rate of 15%.

Corresponding to this is the continuous rise of $VVV. Since entering 2026, $VVV has increased by over 9 times.

$VVV/$DIEM

Earlier, we covered Venice's growth in exposure and user numbers this year, which are the macro-narrative reasons for its rise. But as a crypto AI project with a token, its price increase is also closely tied to the token's mechanisms.

This year, the annual emission of $VVV has undergone multiple reductions and adjustments, dropping from 8 million tokens per year to 5 million. By July 1st, the annual emission will be further reduced to 3 million tokens. The official stated goal is to achieve net deflation for $VVV, ensuring the burn rate exceeds the emission rate to guarantee $VVV's native yield.

$VVV's initial total supply was 100 million tokens. The current total token supply is approximately 79.9 million, with 42.22% (about 33.73 million) of the current supply already burned.

The burn of $VVV is linked to Venice's subscription revenue. At the end of April, Venice allocated more subscription revenue towards token buybacks. For each new Pro plan subscription ($18), $2 will be allocated to buy back and burn $VVV. The Pro+ plan ($68) and Max plan ($200) correspond to $5 and $10 for buyback and burn, respectively.

The current circulating token count is approximately 46 million tokens. Additionally, about 8.85 million tokens remain locked, and around 32.47 million tokens are staked.

The token utility of $VVV is quite interesting. Compared to the awkward situation faced by past crypto projects where "token rights are useless compared to equity," $VVV offers a very compelling solution.

On the foundation of continuously controlling token supply, staking $VVV not only earns more $VVV (receiving more rewards from emission cuts) but also grants the right to mint $DIEM using the staked token $sVVV.

$DIEM can either be traded or staked. Staking 1 $DIEM corresponds to $1 worth of Venice API credit per day.

This credit refreshes daily; what's used today is replenished tomorrow, and it's permanent. What can you do with $1 of Venice API credit? Quite a lot, according to Venice itself:

Stake 1 $DIEM, and get free daily processing of the above with Venice.

However, one must consider that the current price of one $DIEM has skyrocketed to around $1,500. To mint one $DIEM requires approximately 756 $sVVV, costing about $12,800. Is it worth it? Venice's own calculation looks like this:

Overall, the $VVV/$DIEM economic structure, combined with Venice's regulatory mechanisms, gives $VVV a genuine "tech stock" flavor while retaining unique crypto characteristics:

- Supply-side emission reduction prevents excessive dilution of token value (and also protects the $VVV dividends for stakers from dilution).

- Subscription revenue is used for token buybacks.

- Staked $VVV can be used to mint $DIEM, allowing the token to serve a practical function within the product through $DIEM.

- However, this practical utility comes at a cost; $VVV used to mint $DIEM only receives 80% of the dividends ($VVV staking rewards).

- Enables on-chain DeFi operations, such as staking $VVV to obtain $DIEM, then selling $DIEM to buy more $VVV. There are even community projects like @cheaptokensAI that allow users to profit without selling $DIEM, by reselling the daily credit granted by $DIEM.

$POD

Since entering May, $POD has surged over 12 times at its peak, with its market cap rising from about $7.8 million to briefly surpass $100 million.

$POD is the token for Dolphin's distributed AI inference and training network. In simple terms, it involves "mining" with idle GPUs, providing computing power to those needing AI computation services, and earning $POD rewards.

However, the reason for $POD's speculative frenzy isn't the network itself, but another aspect of Dolphin's business—AI models. Venice's current default model, Venice Uncensored 1.2, is jointly developed by Dolphin and Venice and evolved from Dolphin Mistral 24B Venice Edition.

Therefore, although $POD is solely the token for Dolphin's distributed AI network, at this stage, it is being treated as the only investment vehicle for Dolphin and is being heavily speculated upon.

$cyb3rwr3n

This project claims to be building a USDC-based auction market for Venice usage credits. However, it is seen as part of the "VVV" related concepts largely because some players, after analyzing correlations between on-chain behavior and tweets, believe this project is highly associated with Venice founder Erik Voorhees.

The Venice official Twitter account has clarified these speculations, stating that cyb3rwr3n is not an official Venice project.

When this news broke last month, it caused about a 50% price drop, but a few days ago, the token hit a new all-time high. The official clarification hasn't completely erased market associations. According to some community discussions, Erik Voorhees was the first follower of the cyb3rwr3n official Twitter account, and Venice team members like co-founder @TeanaTaylor, CTO @jesseproudman, and product lead @willyogo also follow the account. They argue that even if Venice has no formal link, the supportive sentiment conveyed by such interactions is still a significant bullish signal.

This is also currently one of the cheaper tokens among "VVV" related concepts, with only a $4 million market cap. But being cheap comes with reasons—its product hasn't launched yet, and it currently functions more like a meme coin.

$SR

STRIKEROBOT.AI is a full-stack embodied intelligence platform building a humanoid robot framework for physical AI Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), focusing on safety in hazardous environments (nuclear plants, high-voltage facilities, radiation zones, etc.).

They have a robot training and simulation platform called SR Platform, and $SR is the token for this platform. The project's connection to Venice is the announcement on May 7th about jointly developing a VLM inference layer for robots with Venice and receiving funding sponsorship from Venice.

Since entering May, $SR has risen approximately 4 times, with a current market cap of around $9 million.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the 'VVV' concept referred to in the article, and what is its primary platform?

AThe 'VVV' concept refers to the $VVV token associated with Venice, which is a privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform on the Base blockchain ecosystem, led by Erik Voorhees.

QAccording to the article, what was a significant driver for Venice's rapid growth in user numbers in 2026?

AThe significant driver for Venice's rapid growth in user numbers in 2026 was its high-profile recommendation in the official documentation of the popular project OpenClaw, thanks to its privacy-focused positioning.

QHow does the Venice platform's subscription model contribute to the $VVV token's economics?

AVenice uses a portion of its subscription revenue from Pro, Pro+, and Max packages to buy back and burn $VVV tokens. For example, each new $18 Pro subscription allocates $2 for this buyback and burn, creating deflationary pressure on the token's supply.

QWhat is the relationship between the $VVV token and the $DIEM token within the Venice ecosystem?

AStaking $VVV tokens yields staked $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM token provides a daily $1 credit for using the Venice API. While $DIEM can be traded, it also has this core utility within the Venice product.

QBesides $VVV itself, name two other tokens mentioned in the article that are considered part of the 'VVV' concept and briefly state their connection to Venice.

ATwo other tokens are $POD and $SR. $POD is the token for Dolphin, a distributed AI network, which co-developed the Venice Uncensored 1.2 model with Venice. $SR is the token for STRIKEROBOT.AI, which received funding from Venice and is collaborating with them to develop a VLM inference layer for robots.

Похожее

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

AI Investment Map is Reshaping: Opportunities Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven' Since ChatGPT ignited the AI wave, investment initially focused on the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants dominating cloud infrastructure. However, the rise of DeepSeek and debates on AI capital expenditure effectiveness are shifting this dynamic. Investors now recognize opportunities deeper in the supply chain—the companies providing the essential "picks and shovels." Early concerns about an AI investment "arms race" and potential low returns were partly alleviated by strong Q1 earnings from cloud providers, validating robust compute demand. This has highlighted a more certain investment thesis: regardless of which AI applications ultimately win, massive capital expenditure will first fuel demand for semiconductors and related components. This "pick-and-shovel" logic has driven semiconductor ETFs to record highs. Key beneficiaries include: * **Memory Chipmakers (e.g., SK Hynix, Samsung, Micron)**: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) is a critical bottleneck for AI training. * **Photonics Companies**: Crucial for high-speed data transfer within AI data centers. * **The Broader "AI-11" Semiconductor Ecosystem**: This encompasses foundries & lithography (TSMC, ASML), logic & custom chips (AMD, Broadcom, Intel, Marvell), and enterprise storage (SanDisk, Western Digital). Every dollar of AI infrastructure spending flows through this chain. While the "Magnificent Seven" remain dominant in market size, their earnings growth premium over the rest of the S&P 500 ("S&P 493") is narrowing. Market attention and marginal investment are shifting towards the expanding semiconductor supply chain. The investment narrative is evolving from "betting on the ultimate AI winner" to "investing in the certainty of the infrastructure build-out." Understanding this shift from the demand side to the supply side is key to identifying future AI investment opportunities.

marsbit29 мин. назад

The AI Investment Landscape Is Being Reshaped: Beyond the 'Magnificent Seven', What Opportunities Lie in the Semiconductor Supply Chain?

marsbit29 мин. назад

600 People, $66 Billion: The First Major Cash-Out in the Era of Large Models

The first systematic "big cash-out" of the AI era occurred in October 2025, when over 600 current and former OpenAI employees sold a total of $6.6 billion in shares via a secondary market. Approximately 75 individuals maxed out a $30 million per-person sale limit, while around 525 others cashed out an average of $8.3 million each. This event, exceeding the scale of any 2024 US IPO, functioned as a "shadow IPO." It marked a radical departure from the traditional Silicon Valley path of waiting for a public listing, instead allowing employees to convert equity to cash after just two years of tenure—a direct retention tool in a fiercely competitive talent market where rivals like Meta have offered packages worth hundreds of millions. This massive liquidity event presents a dual-edged sword for OpenAI. While it helps retain talent, it also risks triggering a brain drain as newly wealthy employees may depart. Furthermore, it creates a dilemma for those who sold: they forfeited potential future gains as the company's valuation soared from $400 billion to $852 billion within months. In stark contrast, employees at rival Anthropic demonstrated greater reluctance to sell during their own secondary offering. The financial narratives of the two labs also diverge sharply. OpenAI, while achieving over $20 billion in annualized revenue by 2025, faces massive projected losses (up to $14 billion in 2026), a long path to cash flow positivity, and significant revenue-sharing payments to Microsoft. Anthropic reports rapid revenue growth, improving gross margins, and a faster path to profitability. OpenAI's trajectory is thus balanced precariously between skyrocketing valuation based on funding narratives and the pressures of sustained financial losses post-cash-out. The event underscores that the AI race has evolved into a capital and human experiment, where immense wealth crystallizes the complex calculations of greed, fear, and ambition within the industry.

marsbit49 мин. назад

600 People, $66 Billion: The First Major Cash-Out in the Era of Large Models

marsbit49 мин. назад

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

NVIDIA is taking on a dual role: not just as a leading chip supplier, but as a massive capital allocator across the entire AI supply chain. In 2026, the company has committed over $40 billion in investments within five months, targeting everything from optical fiber manufacturing and data center operations to foundational AI model development. This investment spree, described as a systematic "sprinkler" approach, primarily funds companies that are major buyers of NVIDIA's own GPUs. Critics, including analysts from Goldman Sachs, label this a "circular revenue" loop—comparable to a supplier financing a customer to buy more of its products. A prominent example is NVIDIA's investment in OpenAI, which is expected to generate around $13 billion in revenue for NVIDIA, much of which may be reinvested back into OpenAI. While CEO Jensen Huang dismisses the "circular financing" critique as "absurd," arguing the investments are confidence votes in long-term generational shifts, some analysts express discomfort. They note that while investments in critical supply chain components like optics are strategically sound, funding new cloud providers like CoreWeave feels like "pre-paying for your own GPUs." The strategy carries significant risks. If the AI investment cycle turns, the market may question how much demand is genuine versus artificially sustained by NVIDIA's own balance sheet. Despite posting record-breaking earnings—$215.9 billion in annual revenue and $120 billion in net profit for FY2026—NVIDIA's stock fell after its report, signaling that "beating expectations" may no longer be enough to assure investors about the duration of the AI spending boom. The article concludes that while a bubble isn't necessarily a fraud, NVIDIA's actions resemble adding soap to a bubble—making it appear more robust and durable. This creates a complex scenario requiring extreme冷静 from investors to distinguish between real structural growth and financial engineering.

marsbit1 ч. назад

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

marsbit1 ч. назад

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

"Short Squeeze Exhausted: Will the Next Leg of the AI Rally Continue in Seoul?" A Nomura report suggests the US AI stock rally, which saw the S&P 500 rise ~16.6% in 28 days largely driven by 10 key stocks, may be pausing. The fuel from short covering, CTA fund positioning, and volatility-control strategies is nearing its limit. For the rally to continue, new momentum from retail and sentiment-driven FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) is needed. South Korea's market provided a potential answer on the very day the report was published. The KOSPI index surged 4.32%, triggering a buy-side circuit breaker, led by massive gains in chip giants SK Hynix (+11.98%) and Samsung. This surge is characterized by retail "hynix FOMO" and overseas funds precisely buying into AI themes via chip-focused ETFs, shifting from broad Korean market ETFs. The Korean rally is a high-beta extension of the US AI capital expenditure story, as major cloud providers plan massive infrastructure spending, directly benefiting memory chip leaders. However, this linkage also implies vulnerability. The sustainability of this next leg depends on whether US tech stocks correct, the trajectory of US inflation (with upcoming CPI data key), and geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. Seoul has emerged as the new epicenter of the AI trade, but its fate remains tied to these broader macro and market dynamics.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片