Michael Saylor Says Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Is Not Immediate

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-24Обновлено 2026-02-24

Введение

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, addressed concerns about quantum computing as a potential threat to Bitcoin, stating it is not an immediate risk and is at least a decade away. He emphasized that the broader cybersecurity community views quantum risk as a long-term issue rather than a current threat. Saylor expressed confidence in the Bitcoin ecosystem’s ability to adapt, noting that upgrades would be implemented across global systems if such a risk emerged. He also highlighted MicroStrategy’s significant Bitcoin holdings, which now total 717,722 BTC worth approximately $54.56 billion, despite recent market declines.

Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, discussed concerns about the quantum threat to Bitcoin in an interview and clarified that it is not an immediate security risk at this time, as it is ten years away.

​On February 23, Natalie Brunell, who shared a recent episode of her Coin Stories podcast on X with Saylor, in which they discussed several topics around Bitcoin and Strategy. In the middle of the conversation, Brunell asked whether quantum computing poses an existential threat to Bitcoin.

​She noted that many people are not technical enough to independently verify the seriousness of the risk and referenced Strategy’s earlier statement suggesting Bitcoin is “quantum-proof.” She asked Saylor why this is not considered a bigger threat.

​In response, Saylor stressed that quantum risk is not seen as imminent by the larger cybersecurity community. He insisted that the “consensus of the cyber security community broadly held is that quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years out. It’s not a this-decade thing.”

Quantum Threat Would Trigger Upgrades

Saylor stated, “The crypto community is the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,” he added, adding that it already makes use of innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys. He proposed that Bitcoin uses extremely sophisticated security measures in comparison compared to traditional banking systems.

​Then, Saylor went on and said that if a quantum risk materialized, it would lead to upgrades in the software that runs the Bitcoin network, the global banking system, the global internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks. Eventually, post-quantum-resistant cryptography would replace all digital devices. In his view, quantum risk is currently in the spotlight largely because other anticipated risks have not materialized.

​He said, “You’ll see it coming. We’ll all see it coming, as the crypto security community will be the first to identify any real quantum threat, perceive it, and lead the way. Also, it can have enough time to implement necessary upgrades in response to emerging threats.

Strategy’s Bitcoin Accumulation and Market Performance

Saylor had previously posted “The Orange Century” on his X account, hinting at Strategy’s 100th Bitcoin buy. As the company began to accumulate Bitcoin in 2020 and has since expanded to become the biggest corporate owner in the world. The company owns 717,722 Bitcoin, which is worth around $54.56 billion.

​While writing this article, Bitcoin is down over 3% in the past 24 hours, and is trading at $62,884, which is actually down over 29% over the past month. Also, Bitcoin is down beyond 50% from its last all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Funds Shed $4B as Outflows Hit Five-Week Streak

TagsBitcoinMicheal Saylorquantum

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to Michael Saylor, when is the quantum threat to Bitcoin expected to become a significant risk?

AAccording to Michael Saylor, the consensus of the cybersecurity community is that the quantum risk, if it exists, is more than ten years away and is not a threat for this decade.

QWhat did Michael Sayer suggest would happen if a quantum risk to cryptography did materialize?

ASaylor stated that a materialized quantum risk would trigger upgrades to the Bitcoin network's software, the global banking system, the internet, consumer devices, and all crypto networks, leading to their replacement with post-quantum-resistant cryptography.

QHow does Michael Saylor describe the Bitcoin and crypto community in terms of cybersecurity?

ASaylor described the crypto community as 'the most sophisticated cybersecurity community,' which already employs innovative authentication techniques like hardware keys and uses extremely sophisticated security measures compared to traditional banking systems.

QHow many Bitcoins does MicroStrategy (Strategy) own, and what is their approximate value?

AMicroStrategy owns 717,722 Bitcoins, which are worth approximately $54.56 billion.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin and its performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $62,884, down over 3% in the past 24 hours and down over 29% over the past month. It was also down more than 50% from its all-time high of $126,198.07 in October 2025.

Похожее

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit1 ч. назад

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2 ч. назад

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片