Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Repair Window Opens, Structure and Sentiment Warm Up Simultaneously

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-07Обновлено 2026-01-07

Введение

Matrixport Market Watch: Crypto Market Enters Recovery Phase with Improving Structure and Sentiment The crypto market has begun 2026 with a positive recovery, as BTC and ETH posted significant gains in the first week. This rebound follows the fading of year-end 2025 selling pressure, particularly from U.S. tax-loss harvesting. Key drivers include the return of normal trading activity post-holidays, the dissipation of concentrated selling, and fresh capital inflows, especially from Asian markets. Macro conditions remain supportive, with the Federal Reserve continuing its rate cut path and lowering the federal funds rate to 3.50%-3.75% by end-2025. Softer inflation and a cooling labor market suggest further monetary easing is possible in 2026. While geopolitical events caused brief risk-off sentiment, they were quickly absorbed as short-term noise. On-chain data indicates strengthening fundamentals: BTC and ETH are experiencing net outflows from exchanges, reducing immediate sell-side pressure; stablecoin market cap is rising again, providing more on-chain liquidity for crypto purchases; and network activity, measured by daily active addresses, is recovering. Derivatives markets signal a clear shift in sentiment from defensive to cautiously optimistic. Implied volatility (IV) has dropped to near two-year lows, indicating lower expectations for extreme near-term price swings. The 25-delta skew for BTC options has turned positive, showing reduced demand for downside protectio...

As the market disturbances of late 2025 gradually recede, the crypto market has welcomed a positive recovery trend in the first week of 2026. Both BTC and ETH recorded considerable gains, with market sentiment and on-chain structure showing signs of recovery from the year-end pressure. This article will analyze the current market phase by combining the macro background, on-chain data, and derivatives market structure.

On the macro level, the core logic of market trading remains the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by year-end. The sustained cooling of inflation and the job market provides room for further monetary policy easing in 2026.

Although geopolitical events (such as the situation in Venezuela) triggered brief risk-off sentiment at the beginning of the year, the market quickly digested them as short-term emotional disturbances and did not constitute a driver for a trend reversal. Overall, the relatively mild macro policy outlook has created favorable external conditions for the crypto market's recovery.

Market Performance: Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides, Capital Inflow Drives Price Recovery

In the first week of the year, BTC and ETH showed a clear recovery-driven upward trend. BTC rebounded from around 88,000 USDT to above 92,000 USDT, with a year-to-date return of approximately +5%; ETH rose by about +6% over the same period. This movement is the result of the superposition of three forces:

  • End of Holidays: Trading activity returns to normal, and market liquidity recovers.

  • Tax-Loss Selling Pressure Subsides: The concentrated year-end selling pressure from U.S. investors realizing capital gains tax losses, which was released in December, significantly weakened at the beginning of the new year. Historical data shows that the market often rebounds after such selling pressure ends.

  • Capital Inflow: New allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone actively entered the market, absorbing the year-end selling pressure and driving prices upward from the post-pullback consolidation range.

On-Chain Insights: Signs of Supply Tightening and Capital Inflow

Changes in on-chain data provide micro-level evidence for the market's stabilization and recovery: Continued Decline in Exchange Balances: BTC and ETH continue to experience net outflows from centralized exchanges, tightening the supply of chips available for immediate trading in circulation and reducing potential concentrated selling pressure; Stablecoin Supply Rebounds: The total market capitalization of major stablecoins has resumed an upward trajectory, indicating that the "ammunition" available on the market for purchasing crypto assets is more sufficient, providing liquidity support for the market; On-Chain Activity Warms Up: The daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks has rebounded at the beginning of the year, reflecting a gradual recovery in user participation and market sentiment.

Derivatives Signals: Sentiment Shifts from Defense to Tentative Offense

Changes in the derivatives market structure clearly reveal the shift in market sentiment: Implied Volatility (IV) at Low Levels: Short-term option IV has fallen to near two-year lows, indicating low market expectations for extreme volatility in the near term and a trend towards stable sentiment; Skew Structure Significantly Repaired: The 25Δ skew in the options market has rapidly converged, with BTC's skew turning from negative to positive. This means that the demand for downside protection (put option premium) has weakened, while the demand for chasing upside (call option premium) has begun to heat up, shifting market sentiment from defensive to bullish; Open Interest (OI) Concentrated Distribution: A large number of option open interest positions are concentrated around key price levels near the current spot price (such as the $90,000 and $100,000 regions for BTC), which will become important psychological and technical battle axes in the short term.

Product Strategy: Adapting to the Market Phase, Optimizing Risk and Return

Combined with the current market characteristics of "recovery consolidation, direction pending," investors can choose suitable structured product tools based on their own views.

  • Expecting Consolidation: If expecting the market to continue range-bound consolidation, consider strategies like FCN/Dual Currency, which "sell volatility" to obtain fixed coupons within a specific price range, suitable for phases where volatility is falling from highs.

  • Bullish on Buying Dips: If long-term bullish but unwilling to chase highs, discounted Accumulator allows for automatic分批 buying at preset lower levels, with knock-out conditions to control upside risk, suitable for分批布局.

  • Bullish or Hedging: Holding spot and希望 to take profit in batches above, or needing to hedge short-term risks, consider Decumulator/covered call writing, the former can automatically sell in batches, the latter can enhance spot returns and partially lock in the selling price.

  • Need Liquidity: If financing is needed but unwilling to bear margin call risk, non-recourse financing can provide low-interest liquidity without margin call risk, suitable for long-term holders.

In summary, the current market is in a recovery phase following the year-end pullback. Improved macro liquidity expectations, tightening micro on-chain supply, and warming derivatives market sentiment together constitute a偏多 market structure. However, prices have rebounded near key resistance areas. Whether the market can start a new trend仍需观察 the effective breakthrough of the important resistance levels above.

The above content is all from Daniel Yu, Head of Asset Management. This article only represents the author's personal views.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the three key factors driving the recovery of BTC and ETH in the first week of 2026 according to the article?

AThe three key factors are: 1) The end of the holiday season leading to a return to normal trading activity and liquidity, 2) The significant weakening of tax-loss selling pressure from US investors after its release in December, and 3) The influx of new allocation funds and buying interest from the Asian time zone, pushing prices upward.

QHow does the article describe the change in market sentiment as reflected in the derivatives market?

AThe article states that derivatives market signals show a clear shift from defensive to tentatively bullish sentiment. This is evidenced by low implied volatility (IV), the convergence and positive turn of the 25Δ Skew for BTC (indicating reduced demand for downside protection and increased demand for upside calls), and a concentration of open interest (OI) around key price levels.

QWhat specific on-chain data points are provided as evidence for market stabilization and recovery?

AThe on-chain evidence includes: 1) A continuous net outflow of BTC and ETH from centralized exchanges, making the available supply for immediate trading tighter. 2) A rebound in the total market capitalization of major stablecoins, indicating more 'ammunition' is available to buy crypto assets. 3) A recovery in the daily active address count on the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, reflecting improved user participation and market sentiment.

QWhat core macro logic is the market trading on, and what is the Fed's policy stance as of the end of 2025?

AThe core macro logic is the shift in global liquidity expectations. The Federal Reserve continued its interest rate cut path in 2025, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% - 3.75% by the end of the year, with the potential for further monetary policy easing in 2026 due to cooling inflation and the job market.

QFor an investor who is 'Bullish but wants to buy on dips', which structured product strategy does the article suggest?

AThe article suggests the 'Discounted Accumulator' strategy for investors who are long-term bullish but unwilling to buy at high prices. It allows for automatic分批 (batch) buying at pre-set lower price levels and includes a knock-out condition to control upside risk, making it suitable for布局 (position building) in batches.

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片