Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid Takes a Dig at Rate Cut, Will Cryptocurrencies Benefit?

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-12Обновлено 2026-02-12

Введение

Kansas City Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Schmid supports maintaining the current lending rate, citing strong economic growth and persistent inflation. He argues that keeping rates high is necessary to curb spending and prevent inflation from rising further. Recent positive job data, including a drop in unemployment, supports the likelihood of a rate pause in the upcoming March 2026 meeting. While lower interest rates typically encourage investment in riskier assets like cryptocurrencies, the current high-rate environment may lead investors toward safer alternatives. Major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are currently trading below key thresholds, though some institutions remain optimistic about the sector's long-term prospects.

Kansas City Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Schmid has come out in support of keeping the lending rate unchanged, at least in the next March meeting. He has based his statement on the grounds of the recent job data. It remains to be seen how investors react when allocating their funds to cryptocurrencies, which are going through turmoil at the moment.

Jeffrey Schmid on Rate Cut

Jeffrey Schmid, the President of Kansas City Federal Reserve, has noted the strong economic growth and sought a tighter monetary policy. He has said that the inflation is still running hot with demand exceeding the supply, adding that leaving interest rates high is needed to discourage spending and investment.

Jeffrey has further stated that further rate cuts could allow inflation to surge for longer, specifically at a time when the economy has a chance to grow above the trend. His statement comes at a time when US President Donald Trump has sought lower rates and Kevin Warsh, the next Fed Chair, has signalled that his policies would be in line with the same.

Rate Cut Paused?

A rate cut pause is plausible, given that the employment data have come out better than expected. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the nonfarm payroll rose by 130k in January 2026, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.3% from 4.4%.

Oren Klachkin, a notable financial market economist, has said that an extended pause still seems likely. For a quick reference, the US Federal Reserve kept the lending rate unchanged in the January 2026 meeting.

The next meeting is scheduled in March 2026, when it is anticipated that the rate could again remain unchanged. Statements by Oren and Jeffery hint at a strong possibility of no rate cut in March 2026. However, a rate cut in June 2026 is still possible.

What’s For Cryptocurrencies?

Ideally, lower rates enable investors to allocate more funds to cryptocurrencies because their risk appetite is higher. Higher rates negate that intention. Thereby forcing investors to look for safer alternatives, like Gold and Silver at the moment.

Crypto prices are currently below the expected lines. BTC, for example, is trading at $68,029.09, below the $70k mark. ETH, similarly, is exchanging hands at $1,994.87 at the time of writing this article. The value is below the $3k mark.

Nevertheless, JPMorgan earlier expressed that it was bullish on cryptocurrencies following a reduction in the Bitcoin production cost to approximately $77k.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

OKX Ventures Invests in STBL To Launch RWA-Backed Stablecoin With Hamilton Lane and Securitize

TagsCryptocurrencyFederal Reserverate cut

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the stance of Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid on interest rate cuts, and why?

AJeffrey Schmid supports keeping the lending rate unchanged, at least for the upcoming March meeting. He bases this on strong economic growth, hot inflation with demand exceeding supply, and the belief that high rates are needed to discourage spending and investment to control inflation.

QAccording to the article, what recent economic data supports a potential pause in rate cuts?

AThe recent employment data supports a potential rate cut pause. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls rose by 130k in January 2026, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.3% from 4.4%.

QHow do interest rates theoretically affect investor behavior towards cryptocurrencies?

ALower interest rates typically encourage investors to allocate more funds to riskier assets like cryptocurrencies because their risk appetite is higher. Conversely, higher interest rates negate this intention, forcing investors to seek safer alternatives like gold and silver.

QWhat are the current price levels of BTC and ETH mentioned in the article?

AAt the time of writing, BTC was trading at $68,029.09, below the $70k mark. ETH was exchanging hands at $1,994.87, which is below the $3k mark.

QWhat was JPMorgan's outlook on cryptocurrencies, as cited in the article?

AJPMorgan expressed a bullish outlook on cryptocurrencies, citing a reduction in the Bitcoin production cost to approximately $77k.

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit1 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手1 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片