IMF Flags Financial Stability Risks Amid Growing Tokenization Boom

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-04-03Обновлено 2026-04-03

Введение

The IMF acknowledges that tokenization can increase transparency and reduce friction in finance but also warns it poses significant risks to financial stability. While atomic settlement and automation may reduce some traditional risks, they introduce new ones, making the overall impact uncertain. The tokenized asset market, currently valued at over $27.6 billion (excluding stablecoins), is projected to reach between $2 trillion and $16 trillion by 2030. The IMF report highlights both positive effects, such as faster cross-border payments and greater financial inclusion, and negative consequences, including increased capital flow volatility and threats to monetary sovereignty. It cautions that risks are shifting from banks to shared ledgers and smart contracts. Major institutions like BlackRock and the Intercontinental Exchange are advancing in tokenization, but the IMF warns that without legal clarity on ownership and settlement, these markets risk becoming fragmented and insignificant.

While the IMF acknowledged that tokenization might increase transparency and decrease friction in the financial sector, it also cautioned that the technology could pose risks to the sector’s stability.

With atomic settlement and improved transparency reducing certain old risks and speed and automation introducing new ones, the total impact of tokenization on financial stability is unknown, according to the IMF’s 23-page assessment released on Thursday.

Based on statistics from RWA.xyz, the total value of tokenized assets onchain exceeds $27.6 billion (not including stablecoins). The tokenization market might reach $16 trillion by 2030, according to Boston Consulting Group’s 2022 projection, but a more cautious $2 trillion, according to McKinsey & Co’s 2024 prediction.

Both Positive and Negative Effects

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said that although tokenization does increase the issuance, trading, settlement, and management of securities and other financial instruments, it also moves risks away from the banking sector and onto shared ledgers and smart contract code.

Tokenization, according to the agency, has both positive and negative aspects. On one hand, it may facilitate speedier cross-border payments and increase financial inclusion in developing nations. On the other hand, it increases the danger of capital flow volatility, currency substitution, and the loss of monetary sovereignty.

Some prominent Wall Street figures, including Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, have advocated for the tokenization of various assets on the blockchain, including equities, bonds, money market funds, and even real estate.

The BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund’s tokenization platform, Securitize, ranks first among RWA tokenization platforms by total value locked at $3.38 billion, according to CryptoDep’s citation of April 1 data.

Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, has also taken action, saying in January that it would provide a tokenization platform that allows for the post-trade settlement of exchange-traded funds and equities and the 24/7 trading of these assets using a blockchain technology.

Tokenized markets run the danger of becoming disjointed and unimportant if there is no legal certainty about ownership records and settlement finality, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hong Kong Stablecoin Licensing Delayed as HKMA Holds Back Approvals

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the potential benefits of tokenization in the financial sector according to the IMF?

AThe IMF acknowledged that tokenization might increase transparency, decrease friction, facilitate speedier cross-border payments, and increase financial inclusion in developing nations.

QWhat is the projected size of the tokenization market by 2030 according to different consulting firms?

ABoston Consulting Group projected the tokenization market might reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey & Co provided a more cautious prediction of $2 trillion in 2024.

QWhat new risks does the IMF associate with the tokenization of assets?

AThe IMF cautioned that tokenization could pose risks such as capital flow volatility, currency substitution, loss of monetary sovereignty, and the danger of markets becoming disjointed due to a lack of legal certainty about ownership records and settlement finality.

QWhich company's tokenization platform currently has the highest total value locked, and what is that value?

ASecuritize, the tokenization platform for the BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund, ranks first with a total value locked of $3.38 billion according to April 1 data.

QWhat action has the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) taken regarding tokenization?

AThe Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the NYSE, announced in January that it would provide a tokenization platform for the post-trade settlement of exchange-traded funds and equities, enabling 24/7 trading of these assets using blockchain technology.

Похожее

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit27 мин. назад

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit27 мин. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit37 мин. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit37 мин. назад

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist46 мин. назад

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist46 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow