Hong Kong Grants Crypto License to Victory Fintech, Expands Regulated Digital Asset Market

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-17Обновлено 2026-02-17

Введение

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has granted a cryptocurrency trading license to Victory Fintech, a publicly listed financial services company. This marks the first such license issued since June 2025, bringing the total number of licensed crypto trading platforms in Hong Kong to 12. The city introduced a strict crypto licensing regime in 2023, requiring all virtual asset trading platforms to obtain SFC approval. Due to stringent compliance requirements, major global exchanges like OKX and Bybit withdrew their applications in 2024. Unlicensed operations have been treated as a criminal offense since June 2024. Regulators are gradually expanding permitted crypto services, now allowing licensed brokers to offer virtual asset margin financing—initially only with BTC and ETH as collateral—and perpetual contracts to professional investors under strict guidelines. Hong Kong aims to balance innovation with investor protection, maintaining a tightly controlled regulatory environment. Future plans include introducing draft legislation in 2026 to regulate crypto advisory services. Currently, no stablecoin issuers have been approved by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has approved a license to a cryptocurrency trading platform for Victory Fintech, which is a publicly listed financial service company. Since June 2025, this was the first license issued by SFC, with a total of 12 licensed crypto trading platforms in Hong Kong.

Strict Crypto Rules of Hong Kong

Hong Kong introduced its crypto licensing regime in 2023. Under this framework, all the virtual asset trading platforms must obtain formal approval from the SFC to operate, which makes this system one of the strictest among other global hubs. Major global exchanges like OKX and Bybit withdrew their applications in 2024 due to the strict compliance requirements, and since June 2024, the unlicensed crypto platform in Hong Kong has been treated as a criminal offense.

The approval for Victory Fintech came right after the Hong Kong regulators gradually expanded permitted crypto services. Recently, SFC announced that the licensed brokers can now offer virtual asset margin financing, and only BTC and ETH are initially approved as collateral. Now platforms can also offer perpetual contracts to professional investors under strict guidelines. This shows that Hong Kong is carefully broadening the crypto products in the market under tight control.

Future regulation plans

Hong Kong regulators are planning to implement more rules. In January, Christopher Hui, who was the Financial Services and Treasury secretary, announced that authorities are planning to introduce draft legislation in 2026 to regulate the firms offering crypto advisory services. However, right now, Hong Kong’s Monetary Authority has not yet approved any stablecoin issuers.

Hong Kong aims to balance innovations with strong investor protection by approving a license to Victory Fintech. Hong Kong remains with strict but structured crypto regulations, with only fully compliant firms allowed to operate.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Trezor and Ledger Users Targeted by Fraudulent Physical Mail Scams

TagsDigital AssetHong KongMarket

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the significance of Victory Fintech receiving a crypto license from Hong Kong's SFC?

AVictory Fintech is the first company to receive a crypto trading license from Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) since June 2025, bringing the total number of licensed platforms to 12, which expands the regulated digital asset market in the region.

QWhy did major global exchanges like OKX and Bybit withdraw their applications in Hong Kong?

AOKX and Bybit withdrew their applications due to the strict compliance requirements of Hong Kong's crypto licensing regime, which mandates formal SFC approval for all virtual asset trading platforms to operate legally.

QWhat new services can licensed brokers in Hong Kong now offer according to recent SFC announcements?

ALicensed brokers can now offer virtual asset margin financing with BTC and ETH initially approved as collateral, and they can also provide perpetual contracts to professional investors under strict guidelines.

QWhat future regulatory plans did Christopher Hui announce for Hong Kong's crypto market?

AChristopher Hui, the Financial Services and Treasury secretary, announced that authorities plan to introduce draft legislation in 2026 to regulate firms offering crypto advisory services.

QHow does Hong Kong's approach to crypto regulation balance innovation and investor protection?

AHong Kong aims to balance innovation with strong investor protection by maintaining strict, structured crypto regulations that allow only fully compliant firms, like Victory Fintech, to operate in the market.

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片