From Content Creation to Business Operations: Five Pitfall Avoidance Guides for Crypto KOLs

比推Опубликовано 2025-12-11Обновлено 2025-12-11

Введение

"The article 'From Content Creation to Business Operations: Five Pitfall Avoidance Guides for Crypto KOLs' outlines key mistakes crypto influencers make and how to overcome them. The first error is treating content creation as a hobby rather than a business, emphasizing the need to shift from chasing engagement to building a sustainable monetization strategy. The second pitfall is lacking a clear niche; the author advises focusing on a specific, profitable area that combines personal passion, expertise, and market demand. The third mistake is using low-quality branding materials, which can undermine credibility. Instead, creators should use professional visuals and clear bios to enhance their perceived value. The fourth error is creating content without a monetization funnel, leading to high visibility but low income. The solution is to build a structured ecosystem that converts followers into customers. Finally, the fifth pitfall is stagnating after choosing a niche. Continuous learning and staying updated with industry trends are crucial to maintaining authority and growth. The article stresses that avoiding these traps can help crypto KOLs transform their content into a long-term, profitable business."

Author: Leon Abboud

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original title: Gaining Followers but Not Money? 5 Growth Traps Crypto KOLs Must Avoid


My journey as a content creator began 8 years ago. Along the way, I have made almost every possible mistake in trying to grow and monetize my brand. Here are the 5 most critical mistakes to be wary of, hoping to help you avoid these costly lessons.

Mistake 1: Treating the Brand as a Hobby, Not a Business

Most creators remain in financial difficulty for a long time because they position themselves as "creators." When you see yourself only as a creator, you focus on optimizing clicks, likes, views, and various metrics thrown at you by algorithms.

Top personal brand creators see themselves as a business. You are a company, just a one-person company, and that company is named after you.

Once you make this mindset shift, everything changes. The creator's mindset is: "What content should I post tomorrow?" The business mindset is: "What process can turn strangers into customers?"

You stop asking "how to get more engagement" and start asking the key questions that truly drive growth:

  • What am I selling?

  • Who is my target customer?

  • What user experience path have I designed?

  • How do I publish content to make users more willing to approach me and eventually purchase?

This shift in thinking can turn scattered content into a long-term money-making machine.

Creators who pursue exposure will eventually fall into the "engagement treadmill"—an endless cycle. You can only keep running until you are eventually exhausted. Escape this trap, or it will consume you.

Mistake 2: No Clear Niche

If you try to speak to everyone, you will eventually find that you resonate with no one.

It's like standing on a chair in a train station and shouting, "Hey, everyone, pay attention!" No one will turn around. But if you shout a specific name, like "Mike," the person with that name will immediately turn to look at you.

This is what a good niche can do for you—it can precisely attract specific people in your target area.

A strong niche needs to have the following traits: profitability, appeal, and sufficient content creation material.

Many people are unsure of what their niche is and don't know how to find it. For me, I like to ask myself this question:

"What is something I am naturally passionate about, willing to go all out to be the best in the world at, and that people are willing to pay for?"

The intersection of these three elements is your niche. It must be something you are truly interested in and passionate about; something you are willing to invest time, energy, and effort into mastering; and something people are willing to pay for.

For example, real-world assets (RWAs), stablecoins, prediction markets, etc., are all good niches. There are many people in these fields who want to understand industry trends and use this knowledge to enhance personal growth or career development.

This is the definition of an excellent niche.

A simple self-test question: "Can I create a long-running newsletter around this niche?" If the answer is yes, then your niche is viable. If the answer is no, you may have just chosen a direction you "feel" is right, not a real niche.

Most creators fail because they want everyone to like them. They pursue as many views and exposure as possible. But in reality, successful brands are not built on popularity but on clear positioning.

Mistake 3: Using Cheap Branding Materials That Lower Account Image

People browse thousands of personal homepages every day, and you have less than half a second to convey value.

If your avatar is blurry, outdated, AI-generated, or from some "dead" NFT project (like one you minted in 2021), you will immediately lose appeal and status.

Remember, your status is not fixed; it can quickly decline because of these details.

Your personal homepage is not a decoration but your "storefront sign." It should enhance your sense of value, not drag it down.

A clear avatar, a clear banner image, and a clear bio—these are all essential. If you don't want to use your own photo, choose a community or identity that truly reflects your values and comes with it a sense of status.

There are now hundreds of active NFT communities offering high-quality profile pictures (PFPs) at various price points. You don't need to own a CryptoPunk to appear wealthy or professional. You need materials that enhance your brand image, not content that lowers your sense of value.

Also, don't use hashtags in your bio, and avoid overly broad terms. Your bio should clearly state three things: who you are, what you do, and why people should respect you, that's it.

Mistake 4: Creating Content Without Building a Monetization Funnel

This is a mistake I made for a long time in my creator career. I created content purely for the sake of creation, never developing a strategy for monetizing the content.

What was the result? I accumulated hundreds of thousands of followers, but when I tried to monetize, I found the income was minimal. The reason is simple—from the beginning, I did not build the right ecosystem for my content.

It's like building a house. You need to lay a solid foundation first to build a tall and stable structure. For any business, this "foundation" is monetization capability.

Most creators publish content without any backend structure. They rely on the virality of the content, hoping that one day a sponsor will fall from the sky and save everything. But this is not building a business; it's gambling on an uncertain "lottery game."

A real brand needs a clear "funnel structure":

  • Top-of-funnel traffic content;

  • A "lead magnet" to attract potential customers;

  • Mid-funnel paid products;

  • High-end core products;

  • And long-term assets that generate sustained income.

With such a structure, every piece of content you create will have a clear purpose and meaning.

Without these, you may gain followers but not make money. And in this industry, this is the worst combination. You may become "famous but poor," eventually burning out from feeling like all your efforts are in vain.

Mistake 5: Stopping Learning and Growing After Choosing a Niche

Choosing your niche is just the starting point. To become the top expert and best creator in your field, you must always stay at the forefront of industry development.

Your field is developing at lightning speed, with constant changes. There are always new hotspots, new announcements, and new trending topics emerging.

You need to become the "go-to expert" in this field, and the way to achieve this is through continuous learning. This means you need to constantly absorb content, read relevant books, listen to podcasts, etc.

My personal habit is to read one marketing book per month, which keeps me at the forefront of marketing knowledge. You need to become the "encyclopedia" of the industry.

People will follow the smartest people in the industry, not those who fall behind the times. Users enjoy reading in-depth content and gaining knowledge from it.

The speed at which you learn and document determines the speed at which you grow.

Once you stop learning about your field, you also stop growing along with it.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7595010

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the first major error that crypto KOLs should avoid according to the article?

AThe first major error is treating your brand as a hobby rather than a business. Creators who view themselves merely as 'creators' focus on metrics like clicks and likes, while successful creators see themselves as a business and focus on converting strangers into customers.

QWhy is having a clear niche important for a crypto content creator?

AA clear niche is important because if you try to appeal to everyone, you end up resonating with no one. A strong niche helps attract a specific target audience, has monetization potential, is personally engaging, and provides ample content creation opportunities.

QHow can poor branding materials negatively impact a crypto KOL's image?

APoor branding materials, such as blurry or outdated profile pictures, AI-generated images, or irrelevant NFT PFPs, can instantly diminish your appeal and perceived status. Your profile acts as your storefront and should enhance your value, not detract from it.

QWhat is the consequence of creating content without a monetization funnel?

ACreating content without a monetization funnel can lead to having a large following but little income. Without a structured funnel (e.g., top-of-funnel content, lead magnets, paid products), creators rely on viral luck rather than building a sustainable business, often resulting in being 'famous but poor.'

QWhy must crypto KOLs continue learning and growing after choosing their niche?

ACrypto KOLs must continue learning because the industry evolves rapidly. Staying at the forefront of your niche by consuming relevant content, reading books, and listening to podcasts helps you remain the go-to expert, attract followers seeking knowledge, and grow alongside your field.

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit56 мин. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit56 мин. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手56 мин. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手56 мин. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片