Ethereum: 2 factors strengthening ETH’s potential bullish breakout

AmbcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-12Обновлено 2026-04-24

Введение

Ethereum’s weekly trading volume has decreased during the past two months as prices consolidated around $3k.

Ethereum [ETH] was in the news for attracting a growing amount of institutional interest. Bitmine Immersion added 86,400 ETH to its staking holdings, worth $266.3 million.

The Ethereum-focused company now has 1.08 million ETH worth $3.33 billion in total staked holdings.

The Ethereum staking queue was longer than the unstaking queue, revealed X user Bull Theory. Around 1.32 million ETH is lined up to enter staking, with an average wait time of 23 days.

Such a large spike in staking activity reflected long-term investor confidence in the leading altcoin.

Ethereum’s price action and the net taker volume metric showed there was potential for a price breakout beyond the $3,200 local supply zone.

Assessing the bullish potential of Ethereum

Crypto analyst Maartunn’s Net Taker Volume metric uses perpetual derivatives data to identify the aggressive actors in the market.

The aggressive participants use market orders, or taker orders, and are the ones who drive prices.

The derivatives market saw a shift from high taker sell volume to a buyer-dominated taker volume. The magnitude of the buyer volume does not match the peaks in taker sell volume in September 2025, but it was a good start.

The spot taker CVD has also been taker buy-dominant since the start of the month. Together, the metrics showed sellers might be exhausted.

The weekly chart revealed that the $2,748 level was a key retracement support level. It was defended in recent weeks, and ETH bulls were challenging the $3,169 level.

The $3,150-$3,250 area has been a supply zone since mid-November.

The weekly trading volume has decreased during the past two months. A breakout past $3,200 would likely see increased trading volume. The OBV was in a retracement phase alongside the ETH prices.

The metrics and price action supported the bullish breakout potential for Ethereum. It remains to be seen if macro conditions and market sentiment will allow another bullish impulse move or not.

Final Thoughts

  • The Ethereum staking queue was miles longer than the unstaking queue, reflecting long-term confidence in the market.
  • The ETH spot and derivatives markets were taker-buy dominant since the beginning of January.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat recent institutional action was taken by Bitmine Immersion regarding Ethereum, and what is the total value of their staked holdings?

ABitmine Immersion added 86,400 ETH, worth $266.3 million, to its staking holdings. The company now has a total of 1.08 million ETH staked, valued at $3.33 billion.

QAccording to the article, what does the Net Taker Volume metric measure and what recent shift did it show in the derivatives market?

AThe Net Taker Volume metric uses perpetual derivatives data to identify aggressive actors in the market who use market (taker) orders to drive prices. It recently showed a shift from high taker sell volume to a buyer-dominated taker volume.

QWhat key price level on the weekly chart was identified as a crucial retracement support level for Ethereum?

AThe $2,748 level was identified as a key retracement support level on the weekly chart, which has been defended in recent weeks.

QWhat two factors does the article suggest are strengthening ETH's potential for a bullish breakout?

AThe two factors are: 1) A large spike in staking activity, reflected by a staking queue much longer than the unstaking queue, showing long-term investor confidence. 2) A buyer-dominated taker volume in both the spot and derivatives markets, suggesting sellers might be exhausted.

QWhat supply zone has been a significant resistance area for Ethereum's price since mid-November?

AThe $3,150-$3,250 price area has been a significant supply zone (resistance) for Ethereum since mid-November.

Похожее

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

From Robinhood to Polymarket: The Era of All-in-One Asset Platforms Is Coming Asset classes are rapidly converging. Platforms that once specialized in single categories—such as stocks, cryptocurrencies, or prediction markets—are now moving toward offering all three. Robinhood pioneered this model, starting with equities, adding crypto in 2018, and prediction markets in 2025. This strategy has proven resilient: when crypto revenues fell, other segments like options and stocks filled the gap. Now, prediction market leaders Polymarket and Kalshi are moving in the same direction, both announcing perpetual futures trading on April 21, 2026, pending regulatory approval. These futures will cover assets like Bitcoin, gold, and stocks such as Nvidia. This trend mirrors the consolidation seen in consumer tech, like smartphones replacing dedicated cameras and MP3 players. Younger users, accustomed to interacting with multiple asset types from an early age, will increasingly demand unified platforms. A key competitive advantage in prediction markets is collateral utilization—idle assets locked during betting periods. Polymarket’s move into perpetuals may be a strategy to generate yield from that capital, similar to earlier DeFi integrations like PolyAave. As the regulatory landscape evolves, traditional finance is also likely to incorporate crypto and prediction markets, further accelerating this convergence.

marsbit15 мин. назад

From Robinhood to Polymarket: Is the Era of Integrating All Assets on a Single Platform Coming?

marsbit15 мин. назад

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbit41 мин. назад

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

marsbit41 мин. назад

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit1 ч. назад

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Manyu: восходящая мем-звезда на Ethereum, готовая открыть новую эру культуры Shiba

Manyu - это мемтокен на Ethereum, который приносит децентрализованную культурную и развлекательную ценность через вирусное влияние в соцсетях и вовлечённость сообщества.

1.9k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.11.27Обновлено 2025.11.27

Manyu: восходящая мем-звезда на Ethereum, готовая открыть новую эру культуры Shiba

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ETH (ETH) представлены ниже.

活动图片