Dogecoin loses $0.10 support: Can DOGE stop the downtrend?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-20Обновлено 2026-02-20

Введение

Dogecoin (DOGE) broke below the critical $0.10 support level, reaching a local low of $0.095 before a slight rebound to $0.098. The downtrend is driven by persistent bearish pressure, with sellers dominating the market for over a month. Key indicators like the Bulls and Bears Power and Buyer-Seller Strength show significant bearish control, while exchange data reveals higher sell volumes and a negative buy-sell delta. The Price Momentum Oscillator remains negative, and the RSI stays below 50, indicating continued downward momentum. If the trend persists, DOGE could drop to $0.092 or even $0.08. A reversal would require reclaiming and holding above $0.11.

With bearish pressure and market weakness persisting, Dogecoin [DOGE] broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099.

At press time, DOGE was trading at $0.098, up 0.73%, reflecting heightened volatility.

Bearish pressure strains Dogecoin’s structure

DOGE lost its $ 0.10 support level again, largely driven by heightened sell-side activity. As such, DOGE sellers have dumped at every opportunity, further straining the market.

Looking at the Bulls and Bears power indicator on TradingView, the Bears have commanded total control of the market.

Bears have dominated the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January, and all attempts by bulls to regain control have failed.

At press time, the Bears’ position was 64 compared to 9 for the Bulls, reflecting a significant gap in their market presence. As such, although bulls are active, their presence remains insufficient to sustain a trend reversal.

The Buyer-Seller Strength indicator further supports this. Sellers have remained relatively powerful, with their strength hiking to 68 at press time.

Coupled with that, exchange activity also echoed this bearish dominance. According to Coinalyze, Dogecoin recorded higher Sell Volume for five consecutive days, signaling a lack of bullish conviction.

Over the past day, for example, the memecoin saw 697 million in Sell Volume compared to 619 million in Buy Volume. As a result, the market recorded a negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million, a clear sign of aggressive selling.

Historically, such market behavior has tended to strengthen downside and weaken any upside momentum, leading to lower prices.

Is DOGE at risk of further slip?

Dogecoin traded below its critical support level, amid sustained bearish pressure. With bears running riot in the market, all attempts by bulls to hold on have proved futile.

In fact, the memecoin’s Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) remained negative despite making a bullish crossover days ago. With the PMO holding a negative, it suggests that most price changes have been negative on average.

Thus, markets have closed at lower levels, signaling a bearish trend and confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, not a mere pullback.

At the same time, the memecoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has remained stuck below 50 for a week, further validating this bearishness. Persistent bearish momentum signals a likelihood of downside continuation.

A trend continuation could see DOGE drop to $0.092, most likely losing its $0.09 support, and then fall to $0.08. To invalidate this bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim $0.1 and firmly hold $0.11.


Final Summary

  • Dogecoin slipped below $0.1, hitting a low of $0.095 before rising slightly to $0.098 at press time.
  • DOGE’s downside spiral continued amid persisting bearish dominance in the market.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was Dogecoin's price movement after losing the $0.10 support level?

ADogecoin broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099. At press time, it was trading at $0.098.

QAccording to the Bulls and Bears power indicator, how long have bears controlled the DOGE market?

ABears have commanded total control of the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January.

QWhat does the negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million indicate about market activity?

AThe negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million is a clear sign of aggressive selling, with sell volume (697 million) significantly outpacing buy volume (619 million) over the past day.

QWhat two key price levels does DOGE need to reclaim to invalidate the current bearish scenario?

ATo invalidate the bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim the $0.10 level and then firmly hold above $0.11.

QWhat do the Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) and Relative Strength Index (RSI) suggest about DOGE's trend?

AThe PMO remained negative, confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, and the RSI has been stuck below 50 for a week, both validating persistent bearish momentum and a likelihood of further downside.

Похожее

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit4 мин. назад

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit4 мин. назад

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit8 мин. назад

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit8 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片