Daren Li Flees Ankle Monitor, Sentenced in Absentia for Global Cryptocurrency Scam

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-10Обновлено 2026-02-10

Введение

Daren Li, a dual citizen of China and St. Kitts and Nevis, has been sentenced in absentia to 20 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for laundering over $73 million from a global cryptocurrency scam. The scheme used "pig butchering" tactics, where scammers built fake online relationships to lure victims into investing in fraudulent crypto platforms. Li and his associates moved stolen funds through U.S. bank accounts and shell companies before converting them to cryptocurrency. Li removed his ankle monitor and fled in late 2025. Eight other co-conspirators have pleaded guilty as part of an ongoing international effort to dismantle crypto fraud networks.

A federal court in the U.S. has sentenced Daren Li to 20 years in prison for his involvement in a global cryptocurrency scam that stole more than $73 million from the victims through fake investment platforms and online deception. Darren is a dual citizen of China and St. Kitts and Nevis. He pleaded guilty in November 2024 for laundering money from the scam centers, which were operated from Cambodia.

How the Scam Works

Authorities say these scams were done using the “pig butchering” method. Scammers would randomly contact a person through the social media app, and they would pretend to build relationships. Once they gained the trust of the victim, they were guided to fake crypto investment websites. Victims were shown fake profits to encourage them to send more money, and once large amounts were deposited, the scammers disappeared.

Prosecutors explained that this money sent from the victims is moved by Li and his associates through shell companies and passes through U.S. bank accounts. Then the money was converted into cryptocurrencies. Investigators found that nearly $60 million of stolen money flowed through accounts inside the United States.

However, in late 2025, Li removed his electronic ankle monitor and fled supervision. Because of this, the court sentenced him in absentia. U.S. authorities say they are still trying to bring him back to serve the prison terms. The Justice Department confirmed that eight other people who were connected to this have already pleaded guilty, and officials say that this is part of the larger international effort to break the crypto fraud groups. The authorities continue to work with the foreign partners to identify the suspects and freeze assets.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ark Invest Buys More Bullish as Stock Surges Over 16%

TagsCryptocurrencyScam

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was Daren Li sentenced for and what was the length of his prison term?

ADaren Li was sentenced to 20 years in prison for his involvement in a global cryptocurrency scam that laundered money stolen through fake investment platforms.

QWhat is the name of the scam method used in this cryptocurrency scheme?

AThe scam method used is called 'pig butchering', where scammers build relationships with victims online before guiding them to fake crypto investment websites.

QWhy was Daren Li sentenced in absentia?

AHe was sentenced in absentia because he removed his electronic ankle monitor and fled supervision in late 2025.

QHow much of the stolen money was moved through U.S. bank accounts according to investigators?

AInvestigators found that nearly $60 million of the stolen money flowed through accounts inside the United States.

QWhat is the citizenship of Daren Li and where were the scam centers operated from?

ADaren Li is a dual citizen of China and St. Kitts and Nevis, and the scam centers were operated from Cambodia.

Похожее

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbit24 мин. назад

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbit24 мин. назад

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbit36 мин. назад

AGI is Just One Step Away

marsbit36 мин. назад

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit2 ч. назад

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片