‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-05Обновлено 2026-03-05

Введение

Eric Trump, son of former U.S. President Donald Trump, has criticized banks for their strong opposition to stablecoin yields, calling it "anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American." He claims banks are fighting crypto platforms that offer 4–5%+ yields, but are losing as customers become aware. Tensions between banks and crypto have escalated, threatening the CLARITY Act. Recently, Kraken became the first crypto firm to gain access to the Fed’s payment rails, a move opposed by banks citing financial risks. President Trump also warned banks against undermining his crypto agenda. The rift risks stalling the crypto bill, with prediction markets showing a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026, down from 78%.

Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President Donald Trump, has criticized banks’ strong opposition to stablecoin yield.

In a statement on the 4th of March, Eric Trump said the banks’ fight against stablecoin yield is “anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American.”

He added,

“The banks are desperately targeting crypto/stablecoins, where platforms plan to offer 4–5%+ yields or rewards. Fortunately, the big banks are losing this fight as customers wake up to the games...”

The rift between crypto and banks has worsened over the past few months and threatened to stall the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

There have been ongoing negotiations to reach a stablecoin yield deal between the two industries to advance the bill. However, the recent grant of access to Fed payment rails to Kraken has irked the banks.

Banks oppose Kraken’s access to Fed payment rails

On Wednesday, Kraken became the first crypto-native firm to gain access to the Fed’s payment rails. It had applied for a license five years ago and only received approval this week.

Although crypto supporters hailed the update as a watershed moment for the sector, banks, through the American Bankers Association (ABA), strongly opposed it.

According to the banking lobby, the move was rushed and could expose the financial system to risks.

Interestingly, President Trump also recently warned the banks against undermining his crypto agenda.

He cautioned the bank lobby against pushing to amend the stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, or holding the CLARITY Act hostage over stablecoin yield.

Will banks stall the crypto bill?

Whether banks will come back to the negotiating table to advance the CLARITY Act remains unclear.

However, the recent developments don’t augur well for the previously optimistic outlook of the potential passage of the CLARITY Act by mid-2026.

Even so, prediction site Polymarket showed a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026.

However, the odds had dropped sharply from 78% to 71% in the past two days, amid a deepening rift between banks and crypto alongside the Trump Administration.

That said, the recent crypto market recovery could be affected if the rift deepens and derails the CLARITY Act’s progress.


Final Summary

  • Eric Trump joined his father, U.S. President Donald Trump, in slamming banks’ strong opposition to stablecoin yield.
  • It is unclear whether banks will withdraw support for the CLARITY Act after opposing Kraken’s limited access to the Fed’s payment rails.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat did Eric Trump criticize banks for regarding stablecoins?

AEric Trump criticized banks for their strong opposition to stablecoin yield, calling it 'anti-retail, anti-consumer, and anti-American.'

QWhich crypto firm recently gained access to the Fed's payment rails, and why did banks oppose it?

AKraken became the first crypto-native firm to gain access to the Fed's payment rails. Banks, through the American Bankers Association (ABA), opposed it, claiming the move was rushed and could expose the financial system to risks.

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill that is threatened by the rift between banks and crypto?

AThe crypto market structure bill threatened by the rift is called the CLARITY Act.

QAccording to Polymarket, what are the odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026?

AAccording to Polymarket, there is a 71% chance of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026, though the odds dropped from 78% in the past two days.

QWhat did President Donald Trump recently warn banks about concerning his crypto agenda?

APresident Donald Trump warned banks against undermining his crypto agenda, cautioning them against pushing to amend the stablecoin law (the GENIUS Act) or holding the CLARITY Act hostage over stablecoin yield.

Похожее

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

On June 12, leading crypto data and capital markets platform Blockworks announced its acquisition of competitor Messari for over $10 million. This price represents a significant discount from Messari's 2022 valuation peak of approximately $300 million, highlighting the survival pressures faced by high-valuation startups during the bear market and a consolidation wave in data infrastructure. Blockworks, founded in 2018, began as a media and events company but has pivoted to focus on institutional-grade data, investor relations, and compliance tools. Its recent Series A extension round, valuing the company at $192 million, aimed to fund this shift and strategic acquisitions like this one. Messari, also founded in 2018, grew as a go-to platform for professional crypto research and data, raising a $35 million Series B at its $300 million valuation in late 2022. However, the prolonged bear market and subsequent internal changes, including founder Ryan Selkis's departure in 2024, increased operational pressures. The acquisition integrates Messari's extensive data platform and API capabilities with Blockworks's strengths in issuer-side disclosure, investor relations, and compliance workflows. The combined entity aims to build a unified "system of record" for the on-chain market. This reflects a broader industry trend where high-quality, structured data is becoming critical for institutional adoption, AI agents, and creating data moats akin to traditional financial platforms like Bloomberg. The deal exemplifies how market consolidation is reshaping the fragmented crypto data landscape.

marsbit3 мин. назад

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

marsbit3 мин. назад

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit35 мин. назад

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit35 мин. назад

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手42 мин. назад

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手42 мин. назад

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片