Cross-Chain Bridges Actively Adapt, LI.FI Leverages Intent Architecture to Become the Liquidity Hub for TradFi Institutions

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2026-06-03Обновлено 2026-06-03

Введение

Cross-Chain Bridge LI.FI Transforms with Intents Architecture to Serve as Liquidity Hub for TradFi Institutions Facing declining cross-chain transaction volumes and overall crypto market liquidity, cross-chain bridge protocol LI.FI is proactively shifting its strategy. Moving beyond its role as a "liquidity transfer protocol," LI.FI is targeting new assets, clients, and operational systems. Key to this transformation is the launch of LI.FI Intents, an intent-based execution architecture. This product positions itself as a foundational layer for stablecoin payments, Real World Assets (RWA), and compliant on-chain liquidity, catering specifically to fintech companies, neobanks, wallets, and regulated financial institutions. LI.FI Intents simplifies user experience by offering a turnkey solution. It leverages a solver network for market-maker level execution, enabling precise cross-chain swaps (e.g., between USDC and USDT) without users managing gas tokens or complex blockchain steps. It lowers barriers to entry by integrating with applications like Jumper and Rabby, allowing enterprise users to bypass direct wallet interactions for transactions like payments and asset transfers. The architecture emphasizes compliance. Its network consists of verified legal entities, and enterprises can review and approve orders within their compliance frameworks before processing. All interacting wallets undergo OFAC screening. For ecosystem coverage, LI.FI Intents supports major networks i...

Original|Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser2010)

When TradFi becomes a must-have for the crypto industry, no project can stand apart. However, some choose to start with asset types, while others set their sights on the various companies and institutions behind the assets.

Last month, the cross-chain bridging protocol LI.FI officially and prominently announced the launch of its intent-based execution architecture, LI.FI Intents. This product will serve as the underlying execution layer providing stablecoin payments, RWA, and compliant on-chain liquidity, targeting services for fintech companies, neobanks, wallets, and regulated financial institutions.

Amidst the current trend of stablecoin payments, RWA assets, and compliant assets converging with the on-chain ecosystem, Li.Fi is no longer content with being just a "liquidity transfer protocol." Instead, it is proactively seeking breakthroughs and role upgrades in areas such as new assets, new customers, and new operating systems.

When Industry Liquidity Tightens, Cross-Chain Bridge Protocols Actively Adapt

According to DefiLlama data, cross-chain bridge aggregated trading volume over the past 30 days was approximately $1.92 billion, with a weekly decline of about 1.81%. Since reaching a high of $2.974 billion in October last year, the monthly trading volume of cross-chain bridges has shown a slow downward trend. The trading volume in May dropped to around $1.9 billion, representing a decline of nearly 34% compared to the peak.

On the other hand, the overall crypto market is in a fluctuating downward trend, with BTC spot trading volume having fallen by as much as 81% from last year's highs; on-chain liquidity has further tightened as a result.

Faced with this situation, Li.Fi, as a cross-chain bridge protocol, did not wait passively like most crypto projects. Instead, it actively explored new business areas, seeking new application scenarios and service targets to ensure its long-term development.

In December last year, LI.FI announced the completion of a $29 million funding round led by Multicoin and CoinFund, bringing its total funding raised to $52 million. At that time, the project stated it planned to use this latest funding to expand its business into different trading domains, including perpetual futures, yield opportunities, prediction markets, and lending markets.

Ample funding gave Li.Fi the confidence to explore and build new products while maintaining its core business.

In April this year, LI.FI announced the launch of a new product, LI.FI Earn, providing on-chain yield functionality for enterprises with digital asset strategies. It supports accessing strategies from over 20 vault protocols through a single integration and features built-in cross-chain execution capabilities across more than 60 chains.

In May, the intent execution architecture LI.FI Intents was released, marking Li.Fi's official entry into the enterprise services sector. It empowers a range of B2B clients with the underlying operational capabilities for stablecoin payments, RWA assets, and compliant liquidity.

In the current convergence of TradFi assets and crypto assets, Li.Fi's new direction for upgrades is to lower user barriers, improve liquidity operation efficiency, and open channels for tokenized asset exchange from the operational execution layer. Compared to cross-chain protocols limited to the crypto market, providing financial services to global fintech companies, neobanks, wallets, and regulated financial institutions is undoubtedly a cash cow business with a much higher ceiling.

In terms of user experience, Li.Fi Intents provides users with a more streamlined execution solution, ready to use. It is reported that it primarily offers market-maker-level execution through a solver network, supporting precise output cross-chain swaps between stablecoins like USDC and USDT without requiring users to manage Gas tokens or handle complex underlying blockchain steps. Simultaneously, the architecture allows applications to integrate multiple tokenized asset issuers through a unified interface.

Regarding entry barriers, LI.FI Intents is already live on applications and wallets like Jumper and Rabby. Moreover, with LI.FI Intents, enterprise users do not need to interact with any wallet, which will significantly lower the cognitive barrier for enterprises in areas like transfer payments and asset movements, reducing many cumbersome operational steps.

In terms of compliance, the network built by LI.FI Intents consists of verified legitimate entities. Enterprises can review and approve corresponding orders one by one before the trading processing system handles them, precisely choosing the trading processing systems they trust. This ensures orders flow within a compliant approval system. All wallets interacting with this system are subject to OFAC (U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control) screening, which can be considered the final layer of "compliance insurance."

Regarding ecosystem coverage, LI.FI Intents covers mainstream blockchain networks, including the EVM ecosystem, Solana network, and Tron network. It achieves a certain level of adaptation in ecosystem usability and broad coverage, avoiding potential security risks or single points of failure caused by high dependence on a single blockchain network.

Conclusion: Efficient Automated Services Behind Intent Execution

If tokenized U.S. stocks and RWA assets solve the problems of asset type updates and traditional finance entry barriers, then what Li.FI Intents targets is how to introduce stablecoin payments, RWA assets, and compliant on-chain liquidity into the ecosystems of enterprise users in a better and faster way, improving their operational efficiency and capital utilization.

More importantly, the Li.FI Intents system serves intent execution. Like destination navigation in autonomous driving, enterprise users only need to set the goal; all intermediate execution steps are outsourced and handled by the system.

In today's world of extremely rich asset types, the value of efficient operations will be further amplified, and Li.Fi has already taken the most crucial step.

Похожее

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit38 мин. назад

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit38 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit44 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit44 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit44 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit44 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报53 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报53 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片