CLARITY Act misses March 1 deadline: What’s causing the holdup?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-03Обновлено 2026-03-03

Введение

The CLARITY Act, aimed at regulating stablecoins, missed its March 1 deadline for a key agreement between banks and crypto companies. While the deadline was more a political tactic than a strict cutoff, negotiations continue with major disagreements remaining—particularly around whether crypto firms can offer rewards, APY, or staking benefits on stablecoin balances through backdoor methods like membership programs. Despite the delay, there is cautious optimism, with JPMorgan analysts predicting the bill could still pass by mid-2026 and end the current "regulation by enforcement" approach. The Senate Banking Committee is expected to review the bill again in late March. Market sentiment has been volatile, with Polymarket odds fluctuating sharply—from 72% to 42% in February, then rebounding to 73% in early March—reflecting high uncertainty. The outcome will significantly influence how the U.S. regulates crypto innovation and financial stability.

White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt had set the 1st of March as a deadline for banks and crypto companies to settle their fight over stablecoin rewards.

When the date arrived, though, nothing was announced. No agreement. No clear update.

For many in the industry, that silence raised fresh doubts about whether the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act can move forward or if it will once again stall in the Congress.

CLARITY Act hangs in balance

Sources close to the talks say that the 1st of March deadline was not a strict legal cutoff. It was more of a political tactic to push both sides to compromise.

Negotiations are still happening. Banks and crypto firms are still debating the exact wording of the bill, especially around who controls stablecoin rewards.

Remarking on the same, the source said,

“Overindexing on March 1 is a mistake.”

The Senate Banking Committee is expected to take another look at the CLARITY Act soon. If lawmakers can resolve the remaining disagreements, the bill could finally move toward a full Senate vote.

However, another banking source acknowledged that banks and crypto firms still have key disagreements and have not yet reached full alignment on a deal.

“There’s agreement in-principle that stablecoin balances shouldn’t earn interest, but crypto firms are still trying to backdoor APY on balances through membership programs, rewards, and staking. I think that’s what’s holding up the deal right now.”

Optimism prevails

However, a recent report from JPMorgan Chase says the CLARITY Act could still be a major driver for the crypto market in the second half of 2026.

Analysts believe the bill could pass by mid-year and finally end the current system of “regulation by enforcement,” where companies face legal action instead of clear rules.

With the Senate Banking Committee expected to review the bill again in late March, negotiators are under pressure to settle these issues.

The next few weeks could decide whether the CLARITY Act moves forward or faces another delay.

Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of the DeFi Education Fund, added,

“I think overall things are moving, and it feels like issues are being closed out, but DeFi has taken a backseat to the yield conversation. We’re waiting for Senate Banking to announce the next markup date and updated text, so I think everyone is anxiously awaiting to see what the next draft looks like.”

Are the odds rising or falling?

Earlier, crypto companies believed the GENIUS Act gave them some protection. They argued that even if stablecoin issuers like Circle could not offer rewards, third-party platforms such as Coinbase could.

However, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) recently pushed back. It suggested that third-party reward programs might still run counter to the intent of the law.

This move has made the legal situation more uncertain for crypto companies.

This uncertainty is also showing up in the markets. On Polymarket, the chances of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 dropped sharply on the 24th of February, from 72% to 42% in just one day.

Now, as March begins, the odds were around 56%, but then they spiked to 73% within hours.

That suggests the outcome is far from certain. The next Senate review will not only determine the fate of the bill but also influence how the U.S. balances financial stability with crypto innovation in the years ahead.


Final Summary

  • Banks fear deposit outflows and financial instability, while crypto firms argue rewards are essential for utility and competitiveness.
  • Market sentiment reflects this tension, with Polymarket odds swinging sharply on every development.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the significance of the March 1st deadline set by Patrick Witt, and what was the outcome?

AThe March 1st deadline was set by White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt as a target for banks and crypto companies to settle their fight over stablecoin rewards. It was not a strict legal cutoff but a political tactic to push for compromise. When the date arrived, no agreement or clear update was announced.

QAccording to sources, what is the primary disagreement currently holding up the CLARITY Act deal?

AThe primary disagreement is that while there is an in-principle agreement that stablecoin balances shouldn't earn traditional interest, crypto firms are attempting to offer similar yields through backdoor methods like membership programs, rewards, and staking. Banks are resisting this, and it is a key point of contention.

QWhat does JPMorgan Chase's report say about the potential impact and timeline of the CLARITY Act?

AA recent report from JPMorgan Chase states that the CLARITY Act could still be a major driver for the crypto market in the second half of 2026. Their analysts believe the bill could pass by mid-year, which would end the current system of 'regulation by enforcement.'

QHow did the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) recently impact the negotiations?

AThe OCC recently pushed back against the argument that third-party platforms like Coinbase could offer rewards even if issuers like Circle could not. The OCC suggested that such third-party reward programs might still run counter to the intent of the law, creating more legal uncertainty for crypto companies.

QHow has market sentiment on the Polymarket platform reflected the uncertainty surrounding the bill's passage?

AMarket sentiment on Polymarket has been highly volatile, reflecting the uncertainty. The chances of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 dropped sharply from 72% to 42% on February 24th. As March began, the odds were around 56% but then spiked to 73% within hours, indicating that the outcome is far from certain.

Похожее

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit10 мин. назад

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbit10 мин. назад

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

In South Korea's dating scene, SK Hynix employees are now highly sought after, a status shift fueled by the company's astronomical profits and employee bonuses, projected to reach up to 6.1 million RMB per person by 2027. This marks a dramatic reversal for the long-time second-place player in memory semiconductors, which has now surpassed its rival Samsung in annual operating profit. The turnaround story began in 2008 when a struggling Hynix, emerging from bankruptcy restructuring, took a risky bet by agreeing to develop High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) with AMD. At the time, HBM had no clear market beyond high-end graphics cards and was a costly, complex technology. Major players like Samsung, pursuing its own HMC technology, declined. For Hynix, with only memory as its core business, it was a gamble born of necessity. The pivotal moment came in 2012 when SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won acquired Hynix. Defying industry downturns, he invested heavily in R&D and fabrication, sustaining the HBM project through over a decade of commercial uncertainty and internal challenges. A key break occurred around 2016-2017 when Samsung faced production issues supplying HBM2 for Google's TPU, allowing SK Hynix to gain a crucial foothold in the data center market. The AI explosion post-ChatGPT in 2022 was the catalyst, turning HBM into a critical bottleneck for AI accelerators like NVIDIA's GPUs. By 2025, SK Hynix captured 62% of the global HBM market, leaving Samsung at 17%. For the first time, its annual operating profit exceeded Samsung's. Analysts point to the "innovator's dilemma" to explain Samsung's miss: its vast, successful business portfolio made it risk-averse, preventing an all-in bet on the initially niche HBM technology. In contrast, SK Hynix, as a challenger with its back against the wall, had no choice but to commit fully. The story highlights how Korea's chaebol system allows for ultra-long-term bets beyond quarterly pressures. However, SK Hynix's lead isn't guaranteed. Samsung is aggressively catching up on HBM4, and challenges like customer concentration (heavy reliance on NVIDIA) and technical hurdles in advanced packaging remain. The narrative underscores a market truth: the greatest alpha often comes from betting on uncertain, long-term directions others dismiss, much like HBM in 2008.

marsbit50 мин. назад

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

marsbit50 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2025.03.21

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.2k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片