Centrifuge and Pharos Collaborate to Advance On-Chain Distribution Infrastructure for Institutional Assets

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-02-17Обновлено 2026-02-17

Введение

Centrifuge and Pharos have announced a collaboration to build shared on-chain infrastructure for the scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The partnership addresses a core challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. While tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets remain siloed, inaccessible, or become inactive after issuance. A key issue is that access to dollar-denominated products like credit and Treasuries remains restricted in many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe due to regulatory, operational, and custodial barriers. Even when tokenized, these assets are often distributed in a fragmented way, limiting their reach and usability within active on-chain financial systems. By integrating Centrifuge’s institutional tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’s “inclusive, execution-first” Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified environment for asset distribution, liquidity, and continuous on-chain operation. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets originated through Centrifuge, enabling deeper liquidity pathways and broader capital access. Centrifuge Labs CEO Bhaji Illuminati emphasized that “tokenization alone doesn’t solve accessibility and usability,” underscoring the need for distribution infrastructure. Pharos CEO Wish Wu noted that “the challeng...

February 17, 2026 - Centrifuge and Pharos announced today a collaboration aimed at enabling institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), to achieve scaled distribution and operation on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

This collaboration focuses on addressing a key challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. Although significant progress has been made in asset tokenization, a large number of institutional assets remain difficult to access, fragmented across different platforms, or become "static assets" after issuance, lacking continuous use cases. This collaboration aims to ensure that institutional assets do not merely stop at on-chain issuance but remain continuously usable within a functioning, real on-chain financial system.

In many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe, access to dollar-denominated credit and treasury products still faces regulatory, account registration, custody, and operational hurdles. Even when these products are tokenized, their distribution often remains indirect and fragmented, limiting their ability to reach new participants and their potential for active deployment and use after being brought on-chain.

By combining Centrifuge's institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards with Pharos's "inclusive, execution-first" Layer 1, this collaboration addresses these challenges at a systemic level. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital inflow and create deeper on-chain liquidity pathways. This integrated environment covers wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capabilities, enabling assets to be accessed, aggregated, allocated, and reused, rather than remaining idle long after issuance.

Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs, stated: "Tokenization alone does not solve the problems of accessibility and usability. The focus of this collaboration is to build the distribution and infrastructure layers that allow institutional assets to function within a real on-chain financial environment."

Pharos is positioned as an inclusive financial Layer 1, supporting high-throughput real-world financial workflows through native deep parallel execution and a modular architecture. The network is designed to host large-scale institutional asset activities and enable continuous on-chain operations.

Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos, stated: "The challenge is not demand, but infrastructure. This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can migrate on-chain and remain active within an open, composable financial system."

This collaboration is an early step towards "operational onchain finance": institutional assets are not only mapped onto the chain but are also supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement.

Pharos Network

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where real value and institutional-grade assets can circulate on-chain and achieve composability with decentralized assets, thereby becoming the next generation of financial-grade infrastructure for the global economy. Pharos combines a modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities to drive the development of an "asset-native" ecosystem. The project is built by a management and engineering team from Ant Group and is backed by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other global traditional finance (TradFi) investors.

Official website: https://www.pharos.xyz/

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main goal of the collaboration between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to enable scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

QWhat key challenge in institutional onchain finance does this partnership aim to address?

AThe partnership aims to address the challenge of distribution, ensuring that institutional assets are not just tokenized but remain actively usable within a functioning onchain financial system.

QHow does Pharos contribute to this collaboration?

APharos serves as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital access and deeper onchain liquidity pathways.

QWhat is Pharos Network's primary focus as a Layer 1 blockchain?

APharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, designed to enable the circulation of real-world and institutional-grade assets on-chain with composability with decentralized assets, featuring modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities.

QAccording to the CEOs, what is the broader vision behind this partnership?

AThe broader vision is to move towards 'operational onchain finance,' where institutional assets are not only tokenized but are actively supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement in an open, composable financial system.

Похожее

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbit20 мин. назад

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbit20 мин. назад

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbit32 мин. назад

marsbit32 мин. назад

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

Following a severe price crash of over 50% triggered by the discovery of a critical counterfeiting vulnerability in its Orchard privacy pool, Zcash (ZEC) is taking steps to restore confidence. The bug, found by a security researcher using AI, could have allowed undetected creation of fake ZEC tokens. Developers from the Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) and others quickly patched the flaw, helping the price rebound over 70%. However, Orchard's privacy features make it impossible to verify if any counterfeit tokens were actually created before the fix. To address this, key ecosystem groups including Shielded Labs and The Zcash Foundation have proposed a new system called Ironwood. Its primary goal is to restore users' ability to independently verify Zcash's total circulating supply. Once activated, node operators could confirm the supply hasn't been tampered with. The Ironwood proposal would also block any new coin minting in the Orchard pool and restrict fund movement through a controlled mechanism. This system could provide evidence on whether the vulnerability was ever exploited. If no excess ZEC attempts to leave the pool, it suggests no counterfeiting occurred. Any attempted exit of fake coins would be blocked and destroyed, publicly revealing any attack while protecting the legitimate supply.

bitcoinist41 мин. назад

Restoring Crypto Privacy: ZCASH (ZEC) Makes A Move After 50% Crash

bitcoinist41 мин. назад

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

Solana's price has declined recently, breaking key support levels. However, the network's activity, especially in the Real-World Assets (RWA) sector, shows strong momentum. The ecosystem recorded its largest daily transfer volume ever, surpassing $1.49 billion—a more than 2x increase, led significantly by preSPAX. This signals growing adoption of tokenized assets on Solana. Analyst Zensei highlights Solana as the leading platform for spot trading, noting the SOL/USDC pair's 24-hour volume of over $4.9 billion far exceeds other major markets. Another analyst, Crypto Patel, points out that SOL is trading within a key Fibonacci Retracement Zone, similar to a past pattern that preceded a major rally. While an "Altcoin Season" is seen as necessary for a potential push toward $1,000, the current accumulation zone is between $40 and $60.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Solana Real-World Assets Gain Momentum With Significant Spike In Transfer Activity

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit2 ч. назад

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?