Cathie Wood's Remarks Spark Rare Reputation Crisis for Binance and CZ

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-28Обновлено 2026-01-28

Введение

Wood's comments on a recent program, where she linked Bitcoin's decline to a $28 billion deleveraging event caused by a Binance software glitch on October 10, have sparked widespread criticism against Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) on social media platform X. Many KOLs are labeling CZ a "scammer," accusing him of a "collapsed public image" and facing a "backlash of influence." The criticism primarily focuses on the "1011 event," where Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies crashed, resulting in over $500 billion wiped from the global crypto market cap and more than $19 billion in leveraged positions liquidated. Mainstream opinion holds that Binance's abnormal liquidation mechanism was closely related to the incident, and the exchange later modified the price charts for some tokens. Due to Wood's significant influence in both traditional finance and crypto, her remarks reignited painful memories of the 1011 event among investors, further aggravating sentiment in the already sluggish market. Early critics, including Leonidas, co-founder of Zap/Ord.io, and trader Anglio, sharply condemned CZ, calling him the "biggest fraud in human history" and blaming him for the massive liquidations. The backlash, initially concentrated in English-language circles, eventually spread to Chinese communities on X, where influential figures also began criticizing Binance. OKX founder Star Xu commented that the incident caused real and lasting damage to the industry, urging leading comp...

Author: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

Nearly three months later, the impact of the 1011 incident continues to ferment, even bringing an unprecedented reputation crisis to Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao.

In recent days, on the crypto-related timelines of social platform X, almost all are filled with a large amount of criticism and attacks against Changpeng Zhao, with many KOLs calling him a "scammer," and he is widely considered to have suffered a "collapse of public image" and "backlash from influence."

The incident originated from remarks made by "Cathie Wood" in a program, where she pointed out that the recent high-level pullback of Bitcoin was affected by the $28 billion deleveraging event triggered by a Binance software malfunction on October 10. She analyzed that the current market selling pressure has basically ended, and as institutional investors focus on the turning point of the "four-year cycle," it is expected that Bitcoin will consolidate at the bottom in the range of $80,000 to $90,000 before ending the downward trend and resuming its upward trend.

In the previous 1011 incident, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies plummeted, with the total market capitalization of the global crypto market evaporating more than $500 billion, and leveraged positions liquidated exceeding $19 billion, making it the largest leveraged liquidation event in the history of the crypto industry. From a large number of ordinary users to many well-known market makers and VCs, all suffered heavy losses in the incident. One of the mainstream views is that the occurrence of the incident is closely related to the abnormal liquidation mechanism of Binance. After the incident, Binance also modified the K-line trends of some coins with abnormal changes.

Since Cathie Wood has deep influence in both traditional finance and the crypto field, and is also an early investor in Coinbase and Bitcoin, her remarks brought the painful situation of the 1011 incident back into the sight of a large number of crypto users, which once again stung the emotions of investors in the current continuously sluggish crypto market.

Among the early speakers, Leonidas, co-founder of Zap/Ord.io, was one of the most influential figures. He fiercely said on Twitter that Changpeng Zhao is not only the biggest cryptocurrency scammer in history but also the biggest scammer in the history of human civilization. The world has never seen fraud, manipulation, and corruption on the scale of Binance now. Send this man back to jail!

Crypto trader Anglio also tweeted that CZ is the culprit behind the 10/10 liquidation case. Just because he wanted to kill HYPE, he ended up killing his own space. CZ is a complete criminal. The comments section also had a large number of tweets like "You scam others, destroy people's lives, destroy the market, and still pretend to be a good guy."

The focus of these remarks is on the 1011 liquidation incident, believing that Binance bears the main responsibility in this incident but has never publicly released an investigation report or admitted the problem. At the same time, almost all of the large number of new coins listed by Binance last year have fallen sharply, causing heavy losses to investors. Therefore, Changpeng Zhao, as the largest shareholder of Binance, has become their target.

Perhaps due to Binance's long-term accumulation in KOL relationship maintenance and the information cocoon created by X's recommendation logic, such voices were hardly spread in the Chinese X circle in the early days. But starting from the 28th, the huge negative energy accumulated in the English-speaking discussion inevitably spread to the Chinese X circle, and many well-known bloggers also began to sharply criticize Binance.

Well-known crypto trader Chuanmu tweeted, When will you come out to apologize and compensate all exchange users for October 11th? This Binance couple has been diverting attention and remaining silent about this day to evade responsibility. They harvested tens of billions of dollars in assets from users and market makers in one day, turning the entire industry into an assembly line of the Dubai scam park!

OKX founder Star Xu also tweeted on the 28th that the incident has caused real and lasting damage to the industry. Leading companies in the industry should focus on strengthening core infrastructure construction, building trust with global users and regulators, and protecting the company's long-term interests.

However, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao and He Yi hold a rebuttal attitude towards all external criticism. Changpeng Zhao first linked many negative critical tweets to organized attacks, pointing out that some previously unfamiliar accounts posted highly similar content in a short period of time, showing obvious characteristics of copying and amplification. The overall behavior is closer to systematic operation rather than natural discussion.

Later, Changpeng Zhao tweeted again in response to the质疑 of low listing quality. He pointed out that in any industry, most companies/projects will fail. A few successful cases will grow exponentially. No one can predict the future development of a project. Exchanges should try to give hard-working projects a chance. Not every project listed on the exchange has to be bought by you.

He Yi further linked these criticisms to the changes of the times and conflicts of interest. "When promoting changes in the world, it is often accompanied by a lot of discussion,质疑, and different voices. This is not unique to a certain industry, but a process in history that all structural changes have repeatedly appeared." He Yi said, "The discussions surrounding the crypto industry and Binance have complex sources, including emotional fluctuations brought by market cycles, as well as differences in business competition, models, and positions."

Some KOLs are also附和 the views of He Yi and Changpeng Zhao. For example, Crypto Orange believes that this matter may be a stage in the process of competition and division between Eastern and Western crypto. Cathie Wood has always been the mouthpiece of Western capital. Her remarks are often bolder, more direct, and exaggerated. During the Bitcoin surge, it was also Cathie Wood who publicly shouted for a million dollars, fueling the trend. She is like a signal gun. This time firing at Binance may also be as a mouthpiece for some top Western capital.

But in today's舆论 environment, completely shirking one's own responsibility and attributing the problem entirely to troll attacks and business competition has become a behavior that greatly reduces user favor. This will not only not stop the related controversies but will only further amplify the negative emotions of investors. The relevant discussions on platform X are still further扩散.

In a持续 sluggish market, investors are always inclined to find an outlet for their negative emotions. For a long time, Changpeng Zhao and others, as the industry's largest beneficiaries, have not shouldered their responsibilities well. They have一味 called on everyone to Hodl on Twitter and have been quite controversial in areas such as listing review and industry ecosystem construction. Therefore, under the fuse, they quickly became the target of public opinion attacks. However, demonizing Changpeng Zhao alone as the "industry's biggest scammer," ignoring the market cycle, users' own responsibilities, and the platform's scale effect, does not seem fair either.

In the final analysis, in this track that is still in the stage of野蛮 growth, in this highly volatile, strong-cycle investment field, there is no pure "savior," and there is no eternal "demon."

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the trigger for the recent reputational crisis faced by Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ)?

AThe trigger was a statement by Cathie Wood ('ARK Invest's木头姐') on a program, where she linked Bitcoin's recent price decline to a $28 billion deleveraging event caused by a software glitch on Binance on October 10th.

QWhat was the '1011 event' mentioned in the article, and what was its impact?

AThe '1011 event' refers to the market crash on October 11th, where Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies plummeted. It resulted in the global crypto market losing over $500 billion in value and saw leveraged positions liquidated to the tune of over $19 billion, making it one of the largest liquidation events in crypto history.

QHow did Changpeng Zhao (CZ) and Binance co-founder He Yi respond to the widespread criticism?

ACZ dismissed the criticism as an organized, systematic attack with coordinated accounts posting similar content. He Yi framed the discussions as part of the structural changes in the industry, stemming from market cycles and business competition. CZ also defended Binance's listing practices, stating that most projects fail in any industry and that exchanges should give hard-working projects a chance.

QAccording to the article, what are the main reasons critics are targeting CZ and Binance?

ACritics are targeting them primarily for Binance's perceived primary responsibility in the 1011 liquidation event without providing a public investigation report, and for the significant financial losses users suffered from many newly listed tokens on Binance that plummeted in value.

QWhat perspective does the article suggest is missing from the intense criticism against CZ?

AThe article suggests that demonizing CZ as the 'industry's biggest scammer' overlooks other factors like the natural market cycle, the users' own responsibility for their investments, and the platform's scale effects, which is an unfair oversimplification of a complex situation.

Похожее

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit14 мин. назад

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit14 мин. назад

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手24 мин. назад

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手24 мин. назад

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit54 мин. назад

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit54 мин. назад

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手1 ч. назад

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片