Regulatory Policy

Focuses on global regulatory developments, policy changes, and compliance requirements. It provides in-depth analysis of government regulations and their impact on the cryptocurrency and blockchain industries, helping businesses and investors proactively manage policy-related risks.

Russia's Crypto 'Thaw' Moment: Central Bank Announces New Regulations, to Launch 'Walled Garden' in 2026

Russia's Central Bank has unveiled a new regulatory framework on December 24, 2025, aiming to legalize and regulate cryptocurrency transactions for individuals and institutions by July 2026. This marks a significant shift from the country's previously ambiguous stance toward a structured, state-controlled approach to crypto assets. The policy evolution, which began in 2020 with the Digital Financial Assets Act, has transitioned from strict prohibition to experimental openness, culminating in comprehensive regulation. Key measures include allowing retail investors to purchase up to 30,000 rubles (approx. $3,800) worth of crypto annually per platform after passing a risk-awareness test, while qualified investors face no limits. Privacy coins remain banned, and residents are permitted to transfer crypto from foreign accounts to domestic licensed platforms—a reversal from previous capital control policies. The framework integrates crypto services into Russia’s existing financial infrastructure, likely dominated by major banks like Sberbank and VTB, and supports the development of a state-backed digital payment system. The move is seen as a strategic effort to combat capital flight, mitigate Western financial sanctions, and advance de-dollarization goals within the BRICS bloc. This "walled garden" model reflects Russia’s attempt to harness crypto for sovereign financial interests while managing risks.

marsbit12/25 07:12

Russia's Crypto 'Thaw' Moment: Central Bank Announces New Regulations, to Launch 'Walled Garden' in 2026

marsbit12/25 07:12

RWA Utility Tokens, Stop Kidding Yourselves

The article, written by lawyer Shao Jiadian, critically examines the common claim by RWA (Real World Asset) token projects that their tokens are "utility tokens" rather than securities. The author argues that regulatory bodies globally do not classify assets based on their self-proclaimed labels but on their actual economic function and structure. The core argument is that most so-called "utility RWA tokens" involve users investing money into a common asset pool managed by the project, with the expectation of profits derived from the project's efforts (e.g., dividends, revenue sharing from assets like real estate or equipment). This structure meets the criteria of an "investment contract" and is therefore treated as a security in major jurisdictions like the U.S., EU, Switzerland, and Hong Kong. Two key legal cases are cited as evidence: 1. **DeFiMoney Market (DMM):** Its fixed-yield token and "governance" token were both deemed securities by the SEC because investors' profits came from a managed asset pool. 2. **Unicoin (2025):** An asset-backed token promising returns from real estate and equity was charged by the SEC as an unregistered securities offering and fraud. The author highlights an inherent conflict: utility tokens emphasize *use* and *consumption*, while RWA tokens are fundamentally linked to *assets* and *returns*. Any token offering profit-sharing, dividends, or redeemable cash flows will be viewed as a security by regulators. The conclusion is stark: projects are not avoiding securities laws out of ignorance but to circumvent the stricter requirements of a regulated securities offering. The only viable paths to avoid securities classification are: 1. Purely functional tokens with no profit expectation. 2. Private offerings strictly for accredited investors. 3. Operating under specific regimes like Dubai's VARA that regulate security-like tokens as virtual assets. Ultimately, any RWA token offered to the public that is tradable and promises returns will almost certainly be treated as a security. The choice for projects is not between utility and security labels, but between "long-term compliance" and "short-term gambling."

marsbit12/25 03:13

RWA Utility Tokens, Stop Kidding Yourselves

marsbit12/25 03:13

Circle 2025 Year in Review: Building a Full-Stack Crypto Economy Platform

Circle's 2025 Year in Review highlights the successful construction of its full-stack encrypted economic platform, driven by key regulatory breakthroughs and global expansion. The passage of the U.S. GENIUS Act and the implementation of the EU’s MiCA framework provided regulatory foundation for full-reserve stablecoins, positioning them as core components of the global financial system. Circle’s strategy revolves around three pillars: trusted digital assets (USDC, EURC, USYC), real-world applications, and the Arc blockchain. USDC’s market cap grew 75% to $77B, EURC surged 328%, and USYC reached $1.54B in AUM. Major institutional partnerships were formed with ICE, Deutsche Börse, Finastra, FIS, and others, integrating stablecoins into payments, clearing, and treasury management. The Circle Payments Network (CPN) enabled real-time cross-border transactions, while StableFX reformed foreign exchange with on-chain settlement. The company also advanced AI agent payments and launched the Arc blockchain—an EVM-compatible L1 designed for real-world economic activity, which saw strong institutional interest during its testnet phase. Circle expanded financial inclusion through initiatives like its partnership with Nubank, serving 127M users in Latin America, and its “1% Pledge” program supporting普惠金融globally. The report concludes that 2025 marked a turning point in the transition toward an open, programmable, and internet-native financial system.

深潮12/25 01:54

Circle 2025 Year in Review: Building a Full-Stack Crypto Economy Platform

深潮12/25 01:54

活动图片