Regulatory Policy

Focuses on global regulatory developments, policy changes, and compliance requirements. It provides in-depth analysis of government regulations and their impact on the cryptocurrency and blockchain industries, helping businesses and investors proactively manage policy-related risks.

On-Chain Data Analysis of Tudou Guarantee's Shutdown Event: A Chain-Based 'Black Industry Migration' Triggered by US Sanctions

On January 16, Tudou Guarantee announced the cessation of its services and the closure of all public groups. Beosin Trace conducted an on-chain data analysis of the incident, revealing that Tudou was a major black/grey market escrow platform on Telegram. After the shutdown of Huione Guarantee in May 2025, Tudou became its main successor, experiencing a significant increase in transaction volume. However, from December 2025, Tudou's deposit activities declined sharply, with almost no activity after January 10, 2026. A refund address saw a spike in outflows on January 11, aligning with the platform’s shutdown preparations. Many former Tudou merchants migrated to Xinbi Guarantee, which saw a surge in USDT deposits, averaging 2,700–2,800 transactions per day between January 8–16. These addresses have been flagged as high-risk by Beosin KYT. The shutdown is linked to increased U.S. sanctions targeting Southeast Asian cybercrime throughout 2025, including actions against entities in the Philippines, Cambodia, and Myanmar, which disrupted illegal operations and forced platforms like Huione and Tudou to cease operations.

marsbit01/19 10:19

On-Chain Data Analysis of Tudou Guarantee's Shutdown Event: A Chain-Based 'Black Industry Migration' Triggered by US Sanctions

marsbit01/19 10:19

Charles Hoskinson Slams Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Over CLARITY Act Support

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson criticized Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse for supporting the CLARITY Act, a U.S. crypto regulation bill. Hoskinson argued that Garlinghouse's willingness to accept imperfect legislation compromises crypto's core principles and risks granting excessive power to hostile regulators like the SEC. He warned that the bill, now with over 130 amendments, would treat most tokens as securities by default, forcing projects to seek exemptions from agencies that have historically targeted the industry. In contrast, Garlinghouse and companies like Ripple, Kraken, and Robinhood support the bill for providing regulatory clarity. The divide reflects a broader tension between pragmatic and idealistic approaches to crypto regulation.

ccn.com01/19 10:07

Charles Hoskinson Slams Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Over CLARITY Act Support

ccn.com01/19 10:07

House Democrats Blast SEC Over Dropped Crypto Cases, Ripple Lawsuit Talk Resurfaces

House Democrats have accused the SEC of abandoning multiple high-profile crypto enforcement cases, including those involving Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and Ripple, despite favorable court rulings. In a January 15, 2026 letter to SEC Chair Paul Atkins, lawmakers raised concerns over a potential "pay-to-play" scheme, noting that companies whose cases were dropped had donated significantly to Trump’s inauguration. The letter also criticized the prolonged stay in the case against Justin Sun, citing his financial ties to Trump-linked businesses and questioning possible political influence. Crypto attorney Bill Morgan, however, argued that closed cases cannot be reopened due to the legal principle of res judicata. The ongoing case against Sun remains unresolved and subject to potential future action.

bitcoinist01/19 10:00

House Democrats Blast SEC Over Dropped Crypto Cases, Ripple Lawsuit Talk Resurfaces

bitcoinist01/19 10:00

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

The article "Why Banks Are Determined to Ban Yield-Bearing Stablecoins?" explores the ongoing debate around the U.S. cryptocurrency market structure bill (CLARITY), particularly the fierce opposition from large banks against interest-bearing stablecoins. Banks argue that such stablecoins could cause deposit outflows, but the author refutes this, explaining that funds used to purchase stablecoins like USDC ultimately flow back into the banking system as reserves held by issuers like Circle. The real concern for banks is not the total volume of deposits but a shift in deposit structure. U.S. major banks (e.g., Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase) rely heavily on "low-interest banking," where transaction deposits (used for payments, transfers) pay near-zero interest, creating a significant spread between deposit rates and the Fed’s benchmark rate. This model generates massive profits—over $360 billion annually from interest differentials and transaction fees. Stablecoins directly compete with transaction deposits by offering similar utility (payments, settlements). If stablecoins can generate yield, users may shift funds from bank transaction accounts to stablecoins to earn higher returns. While the money remains in the banking system (as stablecoin reserves), it moves from low-cost transaction deposits to higher-yield instruments, squeezing bank profit margins and reducing fee income. Thus, banks oppose yield-bearing stablecoins to protect their lucrative low-cost deposit base and maintain control over profit distribution, making it a central issue in the CLARITY legislative battle.

marsbit01/19 09:43

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

marsbit01/19 09:43

Bitcoin Drops to $91K as EU–US Tariff Tensions Trigger Crypto Crash

The European Union announced plans to retaliate against the U.S. in response to new tariffs imposed by President Trump, triggering a significant cryptocurrency market crash. Bitcoin dropped from approximately $95,000 to $91,000 in early Monday trading, erasing recent gains and leading to over $850 million in liquidations. The overall crypto market cap fell by 3%, with altcoins following Bitcoin’s decline. The market has lost over $110 billion since mid-January. Trump’s tariff announcement, which includes a 10% levy on goods from major EU countries starting February 1 and a potential increase to 25% by June 1 if a deal on Greenland is not reached, was met with threats of retaliation from the EU. The legality of the tariffs is still under review by the U.S. Supreme Court, adding to market uncertainty.

TheNewsCrypto01/19 09:36

Bitcoin Drops to $91K as EU–US Tariff Tensions Trigger Crypto Crash

TheNewsCrypto01/19 09:36

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

The article explores why U.S. banks are strongly opposing interest-bearing stablecoins, despite claims that such assets could cause bank deposit outflows. It argues that funds flowing into stablecoins like USDC do not leave the banking system—instead, they are held as reserves in highly liquid assets like cash or Treasury bills, which eventually return to banks. The real concern for large banks is not the total volume of deposits, but a shift in deposit structure. U.S. megabanks rely heavily on low-cost transactional deposits (used for payments and transfers), which pay near-zero interest. These deposits allow banks to profit from the spread between the Fed funds rate and what they pay depositors, as well as from transaction fees. Interest-bearing stablecoins threaten this model. They offer similar transactional utility but also provide yield, incentivizing users to move funds out of traditional bank transactional accounts. While the money may return to the banking system, it would likely be placed in higher-yielding deposit accounts, increasing banks’ funding costs. Additionally, stablecoins could disrupt banks’ fee income from payment services. The core issue is profit redistribution: stablecoins—especially those offering yield—could reduce banks’ low-cost funding advantage and erode their transaction revenue, explaining the fierce opposition to interest-bearing models in proposed legislation like the CLARITY Act.

Odaily星球日报01/19 09:26

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

Odaily星球日报01/19 09:26

Crypto Rules Are Coming — And Moldova Is Following The EU

Moldova plans to introduce its first comprehensive cryptocurrency law by the end of 2026, closely mirroring the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations. The legislation will legalize crypto holding and trading but prohibit its use for everyday payments. It will require platforms to obtain licenses, enforce user protection and anti-money laundering measures, and clarify which firms can convert crypto to local currency. The government aims to reduce risks for savers while providing legal clarity for businesses. The drafting process involves multiple authorities and is seen as a cautious step toward financial openness and alignment with EU standards.

bitcoinist01/19 07:31

Crypto Rules Are Coming — And Moldova Is Following The EU

bitcoinist01/19 07:31

Fed Chair Race Takes Sudden Turn: Hassett Hints at Exit, Warsh's Odds Surge

White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett indicated that President Trump is likely to keep him in his current role, effectively removing him from contention for the next Federal Reserve Chair. This development has shifted the odds in the race to succeed current Chair Jerome Powell, with former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh now emerging as the clear favorite. Prediction markets show Warsh’s probability rising to 60%, while Hassett and Fed Governor Christopher Waller have fallen to around 15%. Another candidate, Rick Rieder of BlackRock, is also in consideration, with some supporters believing he may have a smoother path to Senate confirmation. The selection process, led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, has gained additional complexity due to a Justice Department investigation into the Fed’s headquarters renovation. Powell has accused the DOJ of using the probe to pressure the central bank for rate cuts, raising concerns about political interference in Fed independence. Despite the controversy, Mnuchin expressed confidence that the Senate would confirm any of the four candidates under consideration. Powell’s term ends on May 15, and Trump has said he will announce his nominee this month.

marsbit01/19 05:28

Fed Chair Race Takes Sudden Turn: Hassett Hints at Exit, Warsh's Odds Surge

marsbit01/19 05:28

The United States Will Not Reject Stablecoins

The article argues that the U.S. has no fundamental reason to reject stablecoins, despite regulatory friction. The debate centers on the "passive yield" mechanism, with traditional banks fearing massive deposit outflows—potentially up to $6 trillion—from community banks into yield-bearing stablecoins like USDC, which could raise lending costs. Coinbase counters that yield is a tool for user benefit and efficiency, helping users escape near-zero bank interest rates. Stablecoin issuers like Tether and Circle have become significant buyers of U.S. Treasury bonds, holding $1700 billion in Treasuries and accounting for a small but growing share of the money supply. With foreign demand for U.S. debt declining, stablecoins help sustain Treasury markets. The piece traces the rapid evolution of on-chain yield mechanisms, from Ethena’s USDe—which surged then contracted after deleveraging events—to more mature vault-based models like those on Morpho. While on-chain yield products have advanced, real-world adoption in payments remains limited. The solution proposed is integrating yield into payment systems, making yield a default feature during transactions—not just when holding or idling—thus benefiting users, merchants, and platforms. Examples like Airwallex’s yield products and travel platform partnerships show the potential. The conclusion is that stablecoins must expand utility and user base to succeed, with the next challenge being the governance of yield vaults to prevent systemic risks.

marsbit01/19 03:37

The United States Will Not Reject Stablecoins

marsbit01/19 03:37

Google Play Drops International Crypto Exchange Apps In South Korea

Starting January 28, 2026, Google Play will prohibit downloads and updates for overseas cryptocurrency exchange and wallet apps in South Korea unless they provide proof of registration with the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). Developers must submit FIU acceptance evidence via the Google Play Console to maintain their app's availability. This policy shift directly links app distribution to regulatory compliance. As a result, major international crypto platforms without FIU registration will be removed from the Korean Play Store, while 27 domestic exchanges—including Upbit and Bithumb—remain compliant. Users of unregistered apps may face increased security risks and operational difficulties, as web access remains an alternative though less convenient and secure. The registration process for foreign exchanges involves establishing a local entity, implementing anti-money laundering systems, and obtaining security certifications—steps that are both costly and time-intensive. Analysts suggest this move may redirect trading volume to locally registered platforms but could also encourage risky user behavior, such as downloading apps from third-party sources or using VPNs.

bitcoinist01/18 22:02

Google Play Drops International Crypto Exchange Apps In South Korea

bitcoinist01/18 22:02

活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow

Regulatory Policy

Technology Trends