Regulatory Policy

Focuses on global regulatory developments, policy changes, and compliance requirements. It provides in-depth analysis of government regulations and their impact on the cryptocurrency and blockchain industries, helping businesses and investors proactively manage policy-related risks.

The Banking Industry's Resistance: The Endless Debate Over Stablecoin Interest Payments

The article discusses the ongoing regulatory debate in the U.S. regarding interest payments on stablecoins. The proposed *GENIUS Act* currently prohibits stablecoin *issuers* from paying interest to holders. However, platforms like Coinbase can still offer yields (e.g., 3.35% on USDC) because they act as *distributors*, not issuers. This loophole has sparked a significant political battle. The American Bankers Association (ABA) is leading efforts to expand the interest ban to include distributors in the upcoming *Crypto Market Structure Bill*. Banks argue that stablecoins threaten their deposit base, reduce lending capacity, and lack FDIC insurance, thereby endangering their traditional business model. The crypto industry strongly opposes this expansion. Coinbase's Chief Policy Officer argues stablecoins haven't caused significant bank deposit outflows. Think tank Paradigm suggests that banning interest on stablecoins used for payments would be akin to a "holding tax" on consumers. The article contrasts the U.S. situation with approaches in China and South Korea. China's digital yuan (a CBDC) pays interest to promote adoption, while South Korea's policy mirrors the current U.S. stance—banning issuer interest but not distributor interest. The conclusion warns that if the ABA's lobbying succeeds, it would cripple the crypto industry. It argues that traditional finance should adapt to innovation, citing examples of banks and asset managers (like BNY Mellon, JPMorgan, and BlackRock) already embracing opportunities in stablecoins and tokenization.

marsbit01/09 12:44

The Banking Industry's Resistance: The Endless Debate Over Stablecoin Interest Payments

marsbit01/09 12:44

The Biggest Variable in the Post-Encryption Market: Can the CLARITY Act Pass the Senate?

The CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025), a key U.S. crypto market structure bill, faces a critical Senate Banking Committee vote on January 15. The bill aims to establish a clear regulatory framework by classifying digital assets into three categories: digital commodities, investment contract assets (securities), and regulated payment stablecoins. It also delineates regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC. Recent closed-door meetings between Wall Street representatives (including SIFMA) and crypto industry players have been "constructive," particularly on contentious issues like DeFi regulatory exemptions and yield-bearing stablecoins. However, significant disagreements remain. Wall Street opposes broad DeFi exemptions and wants to restrict yield-paying stablecoins to protect traditional banks, while the crypto industry defends these provisions. Having passed the House with strong support in July, CLARITY's Senate progress has been delayed multiple times due to these disputes. The upcoming committee vote is crucial for the bill to advance to the full Senate. Supporters warn that postponement beyond April could jeopardize its passage due to midterm election politics. The outcome will determine whether the U.S. can resolve long-standing regulatory uncertainties and provide a clearer path for crypto market growth.

Odaily星球日报01/09 09:51

The Biggest Variable in the Post-Encryption Market: Can the CLARITY Act Pass the Senate?

Odaily星球日报01/09 09:51

活动图片