Industry News

Tracks company news, strategic changes, funding activities, and personnel adjustments across the blockchain and crypto industries, delivering a full-spectrum industry overview for our users.

A New Round Every 5 Minutes: Polymarket Is Stealing the Futures Trading Platform Business

A friend who used to trade perpetual contracts has switched to a "cleaner" form of speculation: Polymarket’s 5-minute Bitcoin price prediction markets. Here, users buy “Yes” or “No” shares on whether Bitcoin’s price will be higher after 5 minutes. A $10 bet on “Yes” returns $100 if correct; if wrong, the user loses only the $10 stake—no liquidation, funding fees, or sudden price spikes causing unexpected losses. This product has quickly gained traction. Within a month of launch, daily trading volume reached over $60 million, accounting for 67% of all crypto directional predictions on Polymarket. The market runs 24/7, with a new 5-minute round starting every five minutes. The appeal lies in its simplicity and transparency. Unlike perpetual contracts, where leverage can lead to rapid liquidations and complex fee structures, the 5-minute market offers capped risk and instant outcomes. It attracts users looking for high-frequency, low-barrier, and instant-result speculation. Polymarket operates on a conditional token framework (CTF) on Polygon, with prices settled via Chainlink Data Streams. To prevent latency arbitrage, it uses dynamic fees: higher when market probability nears 50% (max uncertainty), lower when outcomes are clearer. Twenty percent of fees are rebated to market makers to improve liquidity. However, AI trading bots are active, with some developers claiming over 80% win rates by leveraging vast amounts of intraday data. Polymarket has partnered with Palantir and TWG AI to monitor trading and detect market abuse, creating an AI-vs-AI dynamic. Major exchanges are responding by integrating prediction markets. Binance launched Opinion (OPN), Coinbase integrated Kalshi, and Gemini built its own predictions platform after securing a CFTC license. Kalshi’s integration with Robinhood helped its annual volume surge from $300 million to $23.8 billion, showing the power of distribution. Regulatory challenges remain. In the U.S., the CFTC claims jurisdiction over prediction contracts as swaps, while many states treat them as gambling and have sued or banned platforms. Similar conflicts exist in the EU and Asia, where some countries outright ban such platforms. In summary, Polymarket’s success shows that many users prefer simple, high-frequency outcome-based speculation over complex leveraged products. As exchanges rush to adopt similar offerings, regulatory uncertainty persists, but user adoption continues to grow.

marsbit03/13 09:44

A New Round Every 5 Minutes: Polymarket Is Stealing the Futures Trading Platform Business

marsbit03/13 09:44

Why Is OpenAI Playing Catch-Up with Claude Code?

In the rapidly evolving field of AI coding assistants, OpenAI, which once led the generative AI wave with ChatGPT, has found itself in the unexpected position of playing catch-up against Anthropic’s Claude Code. Through interviews with OpenAI executives, engineers, and developers, the article reveals that OpenAI’s early lead in AI programming—via its Codex project—was deprioritized as the company shifted resources toward ChatGPT and multimodal models. This strategic shift allowed Anthropic, founded by former OpenAI members, to focus intensely on coding capabilities, leading to the successful launch of Claude Code. OpenAI later reorganized internal teams and accelerated development of its AI programming products, such as the reasoning-based model o1 and later o3. Despite these efforts, Claude Code gained significant traction, especially after integration with tools like Cursor, which OpenAI attempted to acquire unsuccessfully. A proposed acquisition of Windsurf also failed due to tensions with Microsoft, OpenAI’s major partner. By late 2025 and early 2026, OpenAI’s Codex began narrowing the gap, with user growth rising to about 40% of Claude Code’s usage. The competition reflects broader industry trends where AI agents are increasingly automating cognitive work, raising questions about the future of software development and white-collar jobs. Despite progress, concerns around safety and societal impact remain as AI coding tools become more powerful and pervasive.

marsbit03/13 07:39

Why Is OpenAI Playing Catch-Up with Claude Code?

marsbit03/13 07:39

Free Mirror or Land Grab? OpenClaw Founder Blasts Tencent for Copying

OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger publicly criticized Tencent for creating SkillHub, a localized platform mirroring OpenClaw, accusing the tech giant of copying without supporting the project. Tencent responded by clarifying that SkillHub acts as a local mirror site, properly attributing OpenClaw as the data source and reducing bandwidth strain on the origin server by processing significant traffic locally. It also expressed willingness to become a sponsor. However, Steinberger remained unsatisfied, emphasizing that the core issue was not technical but ethical—Tencent failed to communicate beforehand. The dispute highlights deeper concerns about big tech’s approach to open-source ecosystems: while mirroring is common and often legal under open-source licenses, Tencent’s move is seen as an attempt to control user access, distribution channels, and future commercial influence within the AI agent ecosystem. The incident reflects a broader pattern in China’s internet industry, where major companies rapidly embrace emerging technologies like OpenClaw not purely for innovation, but to capture entry points, traffic, and platform dominance. By offering localized, convenient services, they risk enclosing open ecosystems within their own walled gardens—ultimately dictating which tools get visibility, monetization, and user adoption. As OpenClaw gains explosive popularity in China, the episode underscores a tension between open-source ideals and commercial strategies, where convenience may come at the cost of community autonomy and long-term openness.

Odaily星球日报03/13 07:13

Free Mirror or Land Grab? OpenClaw Founder Blasts Tencent for Copying

Odaily星球日报03/13 07:13

Dialogue with Circle's Chief Commercial Officer: Partnering with Mastercard to Accelerate the Adoption of Crypto Payments, Stablecoins' Future Extends Beyond Trading

Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin with a market cap exceeding $77 billion, is expanding its focus beyond stablecoins to build a comprehensive internet financial platform. The company is developing infrastructure—including developer tools, a payment network, and its own blockchain, Arc—to facilitate the transition of financial services to blockchain technology. This shift promises faster, cheaper, and more transparent global payments. In a recent interview, Circle's Chief Business Officer Kash Razzaghi emphasized that modernizing the financial ecosystem is too large a task for any single entity, highlighting the importance of partnerships, such as with Mastercard. He noted that Mastercard’s involvement lends credibility and accelerates the adoption of blockchain-based payments. Razzaghi identified three primary use cases for stablecoins: trading and investment (currently the dominant use), cross-border payments (due to lower costs and faster settlement), and store of value (especially in countries experiencing hyperinflation). He believes mainstream adoption will occur when the underlying technology becomes so seamless that users are unaware they are using stablecoins—similar to how people use the internet without understanding HTTP. Reflecting on his diverse career spanning sports, media, and fashion, Razzaghi underscored that his passion for mission-driven problem-solving and business development prepared him for his role in advancing blockchain-based financial infrastructure.

marsbit03/13 06:12

Dialogue with Circle's Chief Commercial Officer: Partnering with Mastercard to Accelerate the Adoption of Crypto Payments, Stablecoins' Future Extends Beyond Trading

marsbit03/13 06:12

活动图片