All about SUI’s next challenge after altcoin’s latest 7% hike

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-11Обновлено 2026-03-11

Введение

SUI experienced a 7.3% price surge in 24 hours, alongside a 64% increase in daily trading volume, following broader market momentum as Bitcoin reclaimed $70k. However, longer-term trends remain bearish. Spot trading volume has been declining since October 2025, and the 3-month spot taker CVD has shifted to neutral, indicating weakened sustained buying interest. The price has been range-bound between $0.85 and $1.01, with the $1.00-$1.05 zone acting as a key supply barrier. A breakout above $1.05 is needed to shift the trend bullishly, but without strong spot demand, the token could fall back below $1. The RSI below 50 and declining OBV confirm the prevailing selling pressure.

At the time of writing, Sui [SUI] had rallied by 7.3% in just 24 hours. The rally came alongside the wider market relief as Bitcoin’s [BTC] price pushed its way back above $70k once more.

According to CryptoQuant, the spot trading volume behind SUI has been falling since October 2025. Despite the 64% hike in daily trading volume, the longer-term spot volume trends seemed to be in a cooling phase.

Moreover, the 3-month spot taker CVD shifted from taker buyer-dominated to neutral. The falling cumulative market orders to buy SUI were not new, but have been ongoing for months.

The decline in spot trading volume since September was also reflected in the spot volume bubble map.

What does this mean for SUI prices?

The weekly chart highlighted the bearish trend in place since October 2025. Like many other altcoins and even Bitcoin, the selling pressure on SUI has not relented much in recent months.

There were sporadic periods of buying that saw a price bounce, but as the OBV revealed, selling volume was the dominant force.

Also, the RSI was below neutral 50 to underline that a downtrend was in progress.

Exploring short-term SUI trends

There have been no notable trends recently. Over the past month, SUI has traded within a rough range whose extremes were at $0.85 and $1.01. The local supply zone at $0.97-$1.0 was tested last week. It was also being challenged at press time.

A breakout beyond $1.05 is needed to shift the longer-term trend bullishly. Such a breakout could see SUI fall back below the $1-level if the rally is not borne by sustained spot demand.

Final Summary

SUI witnessed a sharp bounce in the last 24 hours to gain by 7%, with a 64% increase in daily trading volume.
This surge did little to change the big picture though, with the $1-$1.05 supply zone still being difficult to overcome.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the percentage increase of SUI in the last 24 hours at the time of writing?

ASUI had rallied by 7.3% in just 24 hours.

QAccording to CryptoQuant, what has been the trend for SUI's spot trading volume since October 2025?

AAccording to CryptoQuant, the spot trading volume behind SUI has been falling since October 2025.

QWhat does the weekly chart reveal about SUI's price trend since October 2025?

AThe weekly chart highlighted the bearish trend in place since October 2025, with selling pressure being the dominant force.

QWhat price range has SUI been trading within over the past month?

AOver the past month, SUI has traded within a rough range whose extremes were at $0.85 and $1.01.

QWhat price level does SUI need to break out beyond to shift the longer-term trend bullishly?

AA breakout beyond $1.05 is needed to shift the longer-term trend bullishly.

Похожее

I Built Myself an Investment Workbench Using AI

For the past two weeks, I've been immersed in Vibe Coding—using AI to write code from natural language descriptions. This process has enabled me to quickly build functional tools that address long-standing personal ideas. Previously, I had many concepts but found execution too cumbersome. Key ideas included a unified dashboard for assets across US stocks, Crypto, HK stocks, and A-shares; a real-time alert system for price movements; an investment map visualizing sector relationships; and a tool to correlate prediction market bets with news and market data. Traditional development hurdles meant these often remained unrealized. Using AI (Codex, Claude Code, and DeepSeek API), I built four initial tools: 1. A **Cross-Market Asset Dashboard** showing total assets, daily P&L, and holdings by market, with added features for alerts and sector mapping. It's deployed locally for privacy. 2. A **Prediction Market (PM) Monitor** tracking bets on events (e.g., company valuations) and correlating probability shifts with news and market movements. I categorize bets by conviction to filter noise. 3. A **Simple Operations Backend** for managing my writing workflow (topics, progress, publishing). It's cloud-deployed for mobile access. 4. A **One-Click Formatting Tool** that automates converting drafts into various platform-specific formats, saving manual effort. While these tools are basic, they represent a significant shift: AI lowers the barrier to creating personalized systems. I believe individual investors can now feasibly build core systems for: * **Asset Observation** (tracking holdings and changes) * **Signal Monitoring** (watching for key market shifts) * **Sector Mapping** (understanding network relationships within a sector) * **Performance Review** (documenting rationale and outcomes) The power of Vibe Coding is its fast feedback loop. Ideas can be implemented, tested, and iterated on rapidly, turning "want-to-do" into "done." This marks the start of my new phase, where I'll share investment thoughts, tool tests, on-chain operations, and educational Web3 content.

marsbit3 мин. назад

I Built Myself an Investment Workbench Using AI

marsbit3 мин. назад

Robinhood, the First Stock in the Predictive Market Concept

The online brokerage Robinhood, which previously partnered with prediction market platform Kalshi to offer event contract trading to its users, is now becoming a direct competitor. This shift began after Robinhood, through a joint venture, acquired and rebranded a CFTC-regulated exchange (now Rothera Exchange). Robinhood's motivation stems from the rapid growth of prediction markets on its platform, which significantly boosted its "other transaction revenue." Recognizing that its vast retail user base is the most critical asset, Robinhood aims to capture more value by routing orders to its own exchange instead of sharing fees with Kalshi. It strategically launched its Rothera platform during the high-traffic 2026 FIFA World Cup, successfully processing tens of millions of contracts in its initial days. This move signals a pivotal power shift in the prediction market industry: control over user distribution and access is emerging as a more decisive advantage than the underlying market infrastructure itself. The future competition may increasingly revolve around which platforms control the major user gateways.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Robinhood, the First Stock in the Predictive Market Concept

marsbit7 мин. назад

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

Title: How to Exit After Asset Tokenization? Author: Symbiotic Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher Summary: Tokenization addresses how assets go on-chain but largely leaves the redemption question unresolved. While tokenized assets can settle instantly, the underlying redemption for assets like treasuries, private credit, or real estate can take from T+1 to 180 days. This gap hinders DeFi adoption of Real World Assets (RWAs). Three emerging models aim to provide instant exit liquidity, differing primarily in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its balance sheet, acting as a bridge during the settlement period. It offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by a single entity's capacity and risk appetite. 2. **Asset-Specific Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers fund dedicated vaults for each supported asset, earning fees. It decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital per asset, leading to potential fragmentation. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (e.g., Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** A shared capital pool supports multiple RWA types simultaneously. Funds remain productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in lending markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market. This model aims for higher capital efficiency, scalability across assets, and serves longer-duration assets like private credit. Key differentiators are: 1) Source of capital and risk bearer, 2) Redemption pricing mechanism, 3) Capital efficiency, 4) Scalability to new asset types, and 5) Composability. The shared liquidity layer model represents a move from piecemeal solutions toward scalable infrastructure, enabling T+0 exits by pooling capital, maintaining yield, and using competitive pricing, thus enhancing RWA utility in DeFi.

marsbit16 мин. назад

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

marsbit16 мин. назад

After Tokenizing Assets, How to Exit?

After tokenization, a key unresolved issue is providing holders with a reliable exit mechanism, as underlying asset settlement (taking days to months) lags far behind on-chain token settlement. Three primary models for instant liquidity have emerged, differing in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single, well-capitalized entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its own reserves. This offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by that single balance sheet's capacity and risk appetite, limiting scalability. 2. **Dedicated Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers (LPs) fund separate vaults for each supported asset. This decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital, which becomes inefficient as the number of tokenized assets grows. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Independent capital providers fund shared vaults that can support multiple tokenized assets simultaneously. Capital remains productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in DeFi markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market where market makers bid. The article argues that the shared layer model offers superior capital efficiency and scalability. It transforms exit liquidity from an asset-specific patch into shared market infrastructure, allowing liquidity capacity to grow with overall market participation rather than being fragmented per asset. This is particularly valuable for longer-duration assets like private credit, where reliable T+0 exits can significantly enhance their utility in DeFi.

链捕手30 мин. назад

链捕手30 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

This article analyzes Anthropic's recent conflicts and strategic moves following the U.S. government's emergency halt of its new Fable model, citing national security concerns over potential "jailbreaks." The author argues this incident reveals deeper tensions between AI labs, governments, and the software industry. While critics view Anthropic's safety-focused rhetoric as marketing fear, the author suggests it serves as a commercial moat masking the company's core economic imperative: moving closer to end-users and their valuable data to avoid being commoditized. The piece outlines a coming clash between frontier AI labs like Anthropic and established software companies. Labs need real-world usage data for model improvement via reinforcement learning, creating a cycle where better products attract more users and more data. This threatens software firms who, as Microsoft's Satya Nadella warns, risk having their value captured by a few dominant models. Anthropic's controversial policy changes—initially secretly degrading Fable's performance for LLM development and expanding data retention—are framed as assertions of control, justified by its safety narrative. The company's foundational belief that it alone is sufficiently concerned about superintelligent AI dangers legitimizes its actions, from resisting government demands to shaping usage policies. The author concludes that this alignment of mission, talent, and business strategy is powerful but concerning, as it concentrates immense potential power in the hands of those convinced of their own righteous understanding.

marsbit40 мин. назад

Anthropic's Triple Moment: Code Leak, Government Confrontation, and Weaponization

marsbit40 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SUI (SUI) представлены ниже.