$30 Billion DeFi Capital Exodus: LayerZero Stumbles, Chainlink Feasts

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-13Обновлено 2026-05-13

Введение

Following the major DeFi security incident involving Kelp DAO, a significant migration of funds is underway from the cross-chain protocol LayerZero to Chainlink's CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol). Over $30 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL) from protocols like Kelp DAO, Solv Protocol, Re, and Tydro has moved to Chainlink in the past week, driven by security concerns. LayerZero is facing a severe trust crisis after the attack. Initially denying responsibility, LayerZero Labs has now issued a public apology, acknowledging management oversights. These include a vulnerable "1/1" single-node configuration for its Decentralized Verification Network (DVN) and past misuse of a multi-signature wallet by a team member. The protocol's weekly bridge volume has slumped to near-historic lows of around $470 million. In contrast, Chainlink is experiencing a surge in adoption and activity. Its independent active addresses recently hit multi-month highs, and whales have been accumulating LINK tokens. Beyond DeFi, Chainlink is securing partnerships with traditional finance giants like DTCC, European stock exchange operator SIX Group, and asset manager Amundi. While LayerZero has announced security upgrades—such as migrating to stronger multi-signature configurations and developing a second DVN client—and contributed to a rescue fund, the event underscores that security is becoming a decisive competitive factor as DeFi matures.

Author: Nancy, PANews

With several leading protocols stepping in to inject capital, quickly covering the funding gap and advancing on-chain recovery, the rescue efforts for the Kelp DAO attack incident have recently seen substantial progress. However, compared to the financial repairs, the harder thing to restore remains market trust.

At the center of this vortex, cross-chain leader LayerZero is facing accelerating withdrawals from many protocols and was forced to make a dramatic shift in attitude within just a few weeks—from initially shifting blame and denying responsibility to now publicly apologizing and initiating rectifications. Meanwhile, Chainlink has unexpectedly become a beneficiary of this crisis, with its CCIP protocol absorbing a large portion of migrating liquidity, showing notable growth in on-chain data.

Securing $30 Billion in Migration in a Single Week, Chainlink Reaps Security Dividends

As the largest DeFi security incident to date in 2026, the Kelp DAO attack has accelerated the migration of on-chain liquidity.

As LayerZero's security controversy continues to ferment, an increasing number of DeFi protocols are reevaluating cross-chain risks and proactively seeking more reliable havens. Over the past week, Chainlink has intensively announced multiple migration cases.

On May 9, Chainlink officially disclosed that four protocols, including Kelp DAO, Solv Protocol, Re, and Tydro, had recently abandoned their original cross-chain bridge or oracle solutions and migrated to Chainlink CCIP. The combined TVL of these related protocols exceeds $30 billion. The official even specifically added the phrase "The Great Migration" to hype this ecosystem shift, revealing strong competitive undertones.

Behind this migration wave is a realignment centered on security.

And besides DeFi protocols realigning due to security concerns, Chainlink has also been continuously gaining favor from traditional financial institutions and crypto projects in recent months.

In March of this year, Coinbase directly put its exchange market data on-chain for the first time via Chainlink's newly launched DataLink service; Europe's largest asset management firm, Amundi, collaborated with Spiko to launch a tokenized public fund based on Chainlink.

In April, OpenAssets formed a strategic partnership with Chainlink, launching an asset tokenization infrastructure solution for institutions; major European stock exchange operator SIX Group partnered with Chainlink to push Swiss and Spanish stock market data on-chain; AWS Marketplace listed Chainlink data services, connecting traditional cloud and blockchain.

In May, the US Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) announced the introduction of Chainlink to build a blockchain collateral management platform, aiming to achieve near-real-time settlement around the clock; Huma Finance partnered with Chainlink to introduce institutional-grade yield products into the multi-chain ecosystem.

Accompanying the ongoing ecosystem expansion, Chainlink's on-chain activity has also noticeably heated up. According to Santiment monitoring, Chainlink's number of unique active addresses broke 282,000 and 264,000 on May 9 and 10, respectively, hitting the highest records since September 2025, and noted this was primarily influenced by the recent large-scale migration of DeFi protocol infrastructure.

Meanwhile, official Chainlink data shows that the total value of its cross-chain tokens has exceeded $61.8 billion, with CCIP transaction volume reaching $19.5 billion.

Market confidence is also reflected in changes in LINK token holdings. According to Santiment monitoring earlier this month, over the past month, Chainlink whale and shark addresses holding between 100,000 and 10 million LINK cumulatively added 32.93 million LINK. Historically, this has often been a strong bullish signal. Over the past 30 days, LINK has risen approximately 19.7%.

LayerZero Faces Trust Crisis, Officials Issue Emergency Apology and Overhaul

Currently, LayerZero is mired in a trust crisis.

According to DefiLlama data, LayerZero's weekly Bridge transaction volume has now declined to about $470 million, approaching historical lows. This attack incident has plunged LayerZero into a trust crisis.

In the early stages of the hack, Kelp DAO attributed the vulnerability exploit to LayerZero's security issues. Subsequently, LayerZero quickly denied responsibility, stating that multiple accusations by Kelp DAO in the rsETH security incident were completely false.

But the controversy did not subside. Last week, LayerZero Labs co-founder and CEO Bryan Pellegrino engaged in heated debates with several security researchers in the ETHSecurity Community Telegram group.

The focal point of contention is that LayerZero Labs could immediately upgrade the default library contract without a timelock, theoretically allowing forged cross-chain messages. This exposed over $3 billion in LZ OFT assets to potential risk for a period. Security researcher Banteg pointed out that several mainstream projects, including Ethena and EtherFi, were still using this default library weeks ago, and about $178 million in assets remain exposed to risk.

Simultaneously, on-chain data also showed that LayerZero's multi-signature address had conducted Meme coin trading, DEX swaps, and cross-chain bridging operations unrelated to multi-signature duties, further raising community concerns about key security. In response, Bryan admitted that related operations were indeed performed by multi-signature team members but denied they constituted "Meme coin speculation trading," claiming the purpose was merely "testing PEPE OFT functionality," and stated that the involved members had been removed.

To mitigate risks, Bryan also publicly advised project teams to promptly adopt a "fixed configuration" to replace the default configuration. Subsequently, Banteg published a list of LayerZero projects still using the default library contract and called on related protocols to migrate as soon as possible.

These remarks quickly sparked industry discussion and skepticism. Chainlink Strategy Lead Zach Rynes had previously criticized LayerZero Labs, stating that its multi-signature keys had long suffered from serious OPSEC (operational security) failures, directly exposing tens of billions in OFT assets to security risks. He further stated that if LayerZero and the industry had truly heeded the persistent warnings from security researchers over the past few years, such attack incidents could have been entirely avoided.

Facing market舆论 and ongoing ecosystem bleeding, LayerZero's attitude shifted noticeably. On May 9, LayerZero officially released a public apology statement, addressing the security incidents and communication issues over the past three weeks.

LayerZero Labs stated that the internal RPC it used had been attacked by the Lazarus Group over the past three weeks, compromising the authenticity source of its DVN (Decentralized Verification Network), while external RPC providers suffered DDoS attacks. The incident affected only 0.14% of applications and approximately 0.36% of asset value, the LayerZero protocol itself was unaffected, and over $9 billion in assets continued normal cross-chain flow after the incident.

However, LayerZero Labs also acknowledged for the first time that it was responsible for management oversight in previously allowing DVNs to provide security for high-value transactions with a "1/1" single-node configuration, which posed a single point of failure risk. The official also disclosed that three and a half years ago, a multi-signature signer mistakenly used a multi-signature hardware wallet for personal transactions. That signer has been removed, and the relevant wallet has been rotated.

Regarding subsequent rectifications, LayerZero Labs announced a series of security upgrade measures, including: already ceasing services for the 1/1 DVN configuration, currently migrating all path default configurations to a 5/5 multi-signature setup with a minimum of 3/3; developing a second DVN client based on Rust to achieve client diversity; launching the dedicated multi-signature tool OneSig to enhance signature security; and launching the unified management platform Console for asset issuance configuration and abnormal behavior detection.

Additionally, LayerZero also contributed over 10,000 ETH to this DeFi United rescue effort, of which 5,000 ETH will be used for the fund, and the remaining 5,000 ETH will be reserved for Aave.

Despite the escalating controversy, LayerZero has not completely lost its market. Major assets, including Ethena's USDe product, EtherFi's weETH asset, and BitGo's WBTC, continue to use LayerZero's OFT standard.

Every major security crisis triggers a redistribution of liquidity and discourse power. As the crypto industry increasingly moves towards mainstream financial markets, the criteria for evaluating underlying infrastructure will become ever more stringent, with security capabilities becoming one of the core competitive advantages.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the immediate consequence of the Kelp DAO hack on the cross-chain infrastructure landscape?

AIt triggered a rapid migration of DeFi liquidity away from LayerZero due to security concerns, with over $30 billion in TVL from protocols like Kelp DAO moving to Chainlink's CCIP within a week.

QAccording to the article, what were two key security issues highlighted by researchers regarding LayerZero?

AFirst, LayerZero's default library contract, which could be upgraded instantly without a timelock, potentially allowing forged cross-chain messages. Second, suspicious non-multisig-related activities from a multisig signer address, raising concerns about key security.

QHow did Chainlink's on-chain activity and LINK token react to the migration trend mentioned in the article?

AChainlink's daily active unique addresses surged to over 282,000 and 264,000, the highest since September 2025. Furthermore, whales and sharks holding 100k to 10M LINK accumulated over 32.9 million LINK in a month, while the LINK token price rose approximately 19.7% in 30 days.

QWhat specific corrective measures did LayerZero announce in its public apology on May 9th?

ALayerZero announced several measures: stopping service for 1/1 DVN configurations, migrating all paths to at least 3/3 or 5/5 multisig setups, developing a second DVN client in Rust for client diversity, launching a dedicated multisig tool called OneSig, and releasing a management platform called Console for configuration and anomaly detection.

QDespite the crisis, which major assets and protocols were mentioned as still continuing to use LayerZero's technology?

AMajor assets and protocols continuing to use LayerZero's OFT standard include Ethena's USDe, EtherFi's weETH, and BitGo's WBTC.

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit2 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手2 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手2 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit4 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit4 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片