2026-04-23 Четверг

Новостной центр - Страница 91

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Bitcoin Mining Companies Flee for the Nth Time

Since late last year, major publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies have initiated a significant wave of Bitcoin (BTC) sell-offs. Cango sold about 60% of its holdings (4,451 BTC) in February, Bitdeer liquidated its entire Bitcoin inventory in January, Riot Platforms sold 3,778 BTC in the first quarter, and Core Scientific planned to sell approximately 2,500 BTC. Notably, Marathon Digital (MARA) sold 15,133 BTC in just three weeks in March, cashing out over $1 billion, while also cutting 15% of its workforce as part of a strategic shift toward becoming an energy and digital infrastructure company. This collective divestment is driven by three primary motives. First, mining has become unprofitable for many; the average cash cost to mine one BTC is approximately $79,995, while BTC trades around $68,000–70,000, resulting in an average loss of about $19,000 per coin. Second, AI data centers offer a more stable and lucrative alternative, with tech giants like Google, Microsoft, and financial institutions like Morgan Stanley providing substantial backing and contracts. Mining companies are repurposing their existing infrastructure—cheap power contracts, data centers, and cooling systems—toward AI, which promises higher, predictable margins. Third, some firms are using BTC sales to optimize their balance sheets, such as repurchasing convertible debt at a discount to reduce liabilities and avoid equity dilution. The industry is diverging into three paths: some, like CleanSpark and HIVE, are坚守 (holding fast) to mining, betting on a cyclical recovery; others, like MARA and Riot, are pursuing a dual strategy of maintaining BTC holdings while expanding into AI; and a third group, including Core Scientific and TeraWulf, is undergoing a full pivot to AI, where mining may become a secondary operation. The future of these companies heavily depends on Bitcoin’s price trajectory. If BTC surpasses $100,000 by late 2026, mining profitability could recover. If it remains below $80,000, high-cost miners may continue to exit. If it breaks all-time highs, the industry could see another expansion cycle. Ultimately, this shift raises a broader question about Bitcoin’s security budget, as miners redirect resources to AI, the long-term cost of securing the Bitcoin network may become a growing concern. However, historically, the network has emerged stronger after each mining shake-out, though this time the transition is structural and could have lasting implications.

marsbit04/03 09:09

Bitcoin Mining Companies Flee for the Nth Time

marsbit04/03 09:09

At What Oil Price Would Systemic Market Risk Be Triggered?

Based on a UBS analysis, the key threshold for systemic risk in global markets is identified as $150 per barrel of oil. The report warns that breaching this level would trigger a dangerous negative feedback loop: soaring oil prices → resurgent inflation → tighter monetary policy → deteriorating financial conditions → collapsing demand → market panic. The impact of an oil shock is not linear but highly dependent on the initial economic vulnerability. In the current environment of high interest rates and weak growth, the damage from rising oil prices is significantly amplified. For instance, with a 40% baseline US recession probability, oil at $150 per barrel could cause an economic downturn nearly five times more severe than under milder conditions. UBS outlines two scenarios: in an ideal steady state, the US economy might withstand oil prices up to $200 per barrel. However, in a realistic risk scenario where financial markets react negatively, the critical threshold drops sharply to $150. At this level, three systemic pressures emerge: macroeconomic stagflation risks as central banks halt or reverse rate cuts; market-wide sell-offs due to compressed valuations and wider credit spreads; and a simultaneous slump in corporate profits and household consumption. The report cautions that markets are currently underestimating this nonlinear, cliff-like risk. While prices between $100-$130 may cause sector-specific stress, $150 represents a breaking point where localized damage transforms into a full-blown systemic crisis, accelerated by vanishing policy flexibility and collapsing market confidence.

marsbit04/03 07:32

At What Oil Price Would Systemic Market Risk Be Triggered?

marsbit04/03 07:32

MSX Q1 Review and Q2 Outlook: Securing the Main Trends in U.S. Stocks, A Methodology for Precise Stock Selection

MSX Q1 Review & Q2 Outlook: Capturing the U.S. Stock Market Trends and a Precision Stock Selection Methodology In Q1 2026, the crypto market performed poorly, with Bitcoin falling about 23%, marking its worst quarterly start since 2018. In contrast, the U.S. stock market, despite significant drops in the "Magnificent Seven," still saw profitable opportunities in rapidly rotating hot sectors. The decentralized RWA trading platform MSX listed 39 new U.S. stock tokenized assets, covering five main themes: aerospace/defense, energy/resources, AI hardware, optical communications, and regional allocation tools. Among these, 38 achieved positive returns, with an average gain of 37.6%. Four stocks more than doubled, all concentrated in AI hardware and optical communications. MSX's stock selection framework focuses on identifying companies with clear industrial trends, tangible order flows, and earnings validation, rather than speculative narratives. The platform avoids high-risk bets on large-cap reversals, instead targeting small and mid-cap stocks benefiting from real capital expenditure and supply chain expansion. In Q1, the five main themes were identified through continuous tracking of corporate earnings, capex guidance, and capital flow dynamics—not macro forecasts alone. AI hardware and optical communications were confirmed as systemic opportunities based on actual order transfers and infrastructure demand from big tech's expanding data centers. Although aerospace/defense and regional tools had modest gains, they provided portfolio diversification and non-correlated hedges, enhancing structural resilience. MSX's listing节奏 was dynamically adjusted based on market signals and industrial data rather than pre-set schedules. Looking ahead, Q2 may see a continuation of the AI narrative but with increased selectivity. Aerospace and undervalued software/SaaS sectors present new opportunities. MSX emphasizes a balanced approach: maintaining core exposure to high-conviction AI infrastructure plays while incorporating defensive assets like energy and tools to navigate macro uncertainties, including interest rate paths and geopolitical risks. The platform aims to help users, especially those from crypto backgrounds, build robust, multi-asset strategies through education and thematic investing tools.

Odaily星球日报04/03 06:07

MSX Q1 Review and Q2 Outlook: Securing the Main Trends in U.S. Stocks, A Methodology for Precise Stock Selection

Odaily星球日报04/03 06:07

活动图片