2026-04-24 Пятница

Новостной центр - Страница 567

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

14 Years After Incubating Coinbase, YC Finally Decides to Issue Investment Funds in USDC

Y Combinator (YC), the renowned startup accelerator behind companies like Airbnb, Stripe, and Coinbase, announced on February 3 that, starting from the Spring 2026 batch, it will offer its startups the option to receive their $500,000 investment in USDC stablecoin. This marks the first time YC has officially introduced a stablecoin payment method for its investments. The decision follows the U.S. GENIUS Act passed in July 2025, which established a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, requiring 1:1 reserve backing and granting holders redemption rights. This regulatory clarity has removed a major barrier to institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies. YC's move is significant because it signals a shift from being a crypto investor to an active participant using stablecoins in its core operations. Benefits include near-instant, low-cost transactions, especially beneficial for international startups in regions like India and Latin America, where traditional banking can be slow and expensive. YC specifically selected USDC due to its U.S.-based issuer, Circle, and regulatory compliance. The accelerator will support USDC on Ethereum, Base, and Solana blockchains. While crypto-native VCs have used stablecoins before, YC’s standardized integration into its process for all startups—not just crypto projects—represents a major step for mainstream venture capital. This shift reflects broader trends: 90% of financial institutions are integrating stablecoins, which saw $46 trillion in transaction volume in 2025. YC continues to seek founders in areas like stablecoin applications, tokenization, and on-chain ventures through its Fintech 3.0 initiative.

marsbit02/05 06:33

14 Years After Incubating Coinbase, YC Finally Decides to Issue Investment Funds in USDC

marsbit02/05 06:33

Don't Delude Yourselves: Even If Binance Dies, The Industry Won't Be Better

Title: Don't Fantasize: The Industry Won't Be Better Even If Binance Dies Amid a weakening BTC price and a critical point for market confidence and liquidity, a wave of intense criticism is directed at Binance, with some blaming it for the market's woes and suggesting that its downfall would benefit the industry. However, a thought experiment exploring Binance's potential collapse concludes that the crypto industry would not improve but instead face severe consequences. Binance, as the largest global exchange with robust profitability and resilience, is unlikely to fail due to operational issues or competition. Potential collapse scenarios include catastrophic asset loss from hacks or unexpected events (e.g., similar to FTX or Bybit incidents) or severe regulatory crackdowns, particularly from U.S. authorities amid political shifts. If Binance were to fall, the aftermath would be devastating: 1. Users would suffer massive asset losses, with Binance's 307 million users (nearly half the crypto industry's estimated population) becoming creditors in a prolonged recovery process, akin to FTX's collapse. 2. Market instability would escalate: if assets are stolen, large-scale sell-offs could cause crashes worse than post-FTX; if assets are locked/destroyed, short-term spikes might occur, but institutional assets (e.g., Binance holds 3% of BTC supply) frozen would trigger chain reactions and multi-year liquidations. 3. Industry confidence would collapse, leading to stricter regulations (e.g., enforced KYC, proof-of-reserves), halted institutional adoption, and a shrinking ecosystem. Smaller exchanges might fail due to compliance costs and user loss, negating any "one falls, others rise" outcome. The narrative that Binance's demise would improve the industry is an emotional "blame-shifting" response to structural challenges like narrative exhaustion and liquidity issues. Binance's dominance results from long-term user and market choice, not chance. Its absence would likely cause more chaos and fragility, not progress. The real question isn't about removing Binance but finding new narratives to advance the industry forward.

Odaily星球日报02/05 06:28

Don't Delude Yourselves: Even If Binance Dies, The Industry Won't Be Better

Odaily星球日报02/05 06:28

From Quiet Exit to Relaunch: Traditional Options Exchange Cboe Competes with Prediction Markets for Entry

Cboe Global Markets is considering reintroducing "all-or-nothing" binary options to attract retail investors, as prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket surge in popularity. These contracts offer fixed payouts if specific conditions are met, such as an index reaching a certain level, otherwise expiring worthless. Cboe had previously launched similar products tied to the S&P 500 and VIX in 2008 but failed due to low liquidity and limited retail participation at the time. The current move is driven by the explosive growth in event-based trading and retail derivative activity, fueled by mobile apps and social media. Unlike the earlier institutional-focused offering, the new binary options are explicitly targeted at散户, with simpler, event-driven contracts designed to compete directly with prediction markets. Cboe emphasizes strict regulatory oversight by the SEC or CFTC and clearing via the OCC to distinguish its products from unregulated platforms. This relaunch represents a strategic effort by traditional exchanges to reclaim retail interest in outcome-based trading, leveraging today’s mature distribution channels and heightened investor appetite for straightforward, short-term derivatives. Success hinges on delivering an intuitive, low-friction experience that can effectively rival prediction markets while operating within a clear regulatory framework.

marsbit02/05 06:27

From Quiet Exit to Relaunch: Traditional Options Exchange Cboe Competes with Prediction Markets for Entry

marsbit02/05 06:27

a16z Latest Research: Why Blockchain is a Necessity in the AI Era?

A16z report argues that blockchain is essential in the AI era to address the fundamental challenges posed by AI's ability to cheaply and convincingly mimic human activity at scale. The internet lacks a native way to distinguish humans from machines while preserving privacy and usability. Blockchain addresses this by: 1. **Raising the cost of AI impersonation**: Decentralized proof-of-personhood systems (e.g., World ID) make it easy for one human to participate but prohibitively difficult to fake multiple identities, restoring scarcity and increasing the marginal cost of large-scale attacks. 2. **Creating decentralized identity systems**: Unlike centralized IDs, blockchain-based systems are user-custodied, resistant to censorship, and avoid single points of failure. 3. **Providing portable "passports" for AI agents**: Blockchain enables universal, portable identity layers that allow AI agents to operate across platforms with consistent credentials, permissions, reducing forgery risk. 4. **Enabling machine-scale payments**: Blockchain infrastructure (e.g., L2s, rollups) supports microtransactions and nano-payments essential for AI-to-AI commerce, which traditional finance cannot handle. 5. **Enforcing privacy in AI systems**: By integrating zero-knowledge proofs, blockchain allows verification of attributes without exposing raw data, depriving AI of the data needed for imitation and making privacy a core defense. In summary, blockchain rebuilds trust by making impersonation expensive, decentralizing identity, ensuring privacy by default, and giving AI agents native economic rails. It is a critical component for an AI-native internet that operates efficiently without eroding trust.

marsbit02/05 06:06

a16z Latest Research: Why Blockchain is a Necessity in the AI Era?

marsbit02/05 06:06

Vitalik's Layer2 Reset: Can It Save Ethereum?

Vitalik Buterin's recent post recalibrates Ethereum's Layer2 (L2) strategy, acknowledging that the original 2020 "rollup-centric" roadmap—based on L2s acting as "branded shards" of Ethereum—no longer aligns with reality. Two key issues are identified: L2 decentralization has progressed slower than expected, with only a few major L2s reaching Stage 1 decentralization, and Ethereum L1 has scaled beyond initial projections, reducing L2s' necessity for scalability. The core conceptual shift introduces a "trust spectrum" framework, recognizing that L2s serve diverse purposes and may legitimately operate at varying decentralization levels (e.g., Stage 0 or 1) without being deemed failures. This allows L2s to pursue different economic and regulatory goals, such as compliant chains with asset-freezing capabilities. Technically, Vitalik proposes a "native rollup precompile" to simplify L2 infrastructure by embedding EVM execution verification directly into Ethereum, reducing audit burdens and improving security. Additionally, a mechanism for "synchronous composability" is outlined, enabling atomic cross-layer transactions between L1 and L2. Responses from L2 teams like Arbitrum, Base, Linea, and Optimism reflect strategic diversity, validating the trust spectrum approach. The post implicitly acknowledges L2s' economic realities, such as sequencer revenue and regulatory constraints, and suggests differentiation strategies for L2s in a cheaper L1 environment. This update demonstrates adaptive leadership, prioritizing realistic evolution over outdated assumptions, and provides a clearer path forward for Ethereum's ecosystem.

marsbit02/05 06:00

Vitalik's Layer2 Reset: Can It Save Ethereum?

marsbit02/05 06:00

Using Claude to Scrape 260,000 Records, I Uncovered Epstein's Crypto Connections

The article investigates connections between Jeffrey Epstein and the cryptocurrency industry by analyzing 266,000 structured records from the Epstein Doc Explorer database, processed with Claude AI. Key findings include: - **Brock Pierce**, Tether co-founder and Bitcoin Foundation chairman, demonstrated Bitcoin to Epstein and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion. Their relationship, which included discussions on crypto volatility and potential investments, extended from 2011 to 2019. - **Blockchain Capital**'s fundraising documents were found in Epstein’s files, suggesting he was approached as a potential investor. Later reports confirmed Epstein invested in Coinbase and Blockstream, facilitated by Pierce. - **Jeremy Rubin**, a Bitcoin Core developer, communicated with Epstein in 2017 about Bitcoin regulation and funding for his research. Epstein offered structured financial support options. - **Joi Ito**, former MIT Media Lab director, used Epstein’s funds to finance the MIT Digital Currency Initiative, linking Epstein to core Bitcoin infrastructure research. Epstein himself showed sustained interest in crypto from 2008 until his arrest in 2019, analyzing Libra just days before. The evidence suggests he acted as an information broker, connecting crypto entrepreneurs, policymakers, and researchers, rather than being a direct investor or technologist. No direct links were found to major figures like CZ or Vitalik Buterin in the available data.

marsbit02/05 04:36

Using Claude to Scrape 260,000 Records, I Uncovered Epstein's Crypto Connections

marsbit02/05 04:36

活动图片