2026-06-05 Пятница

Новостной центр - Страница 398

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Prediction Markets Take Center Stage, But Perp DEXs Quietly Profit from the US-Iran War

In late February 2025, escalating tensions in the Middle East led to large-scale airstrikes by the U.S. and Israel against Iran, causing significant volatility in global financial markets. While traditional markets were closed during the weekend, investors turned to on-chain platforms to trade assets like gold, oil, and silver. Prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi saw a surge in activity, with war-related contracts driving record trading volumes. However, perpetual decentralized exchanges (perp DEXs), particularly Hyperliquid, also capitalized on the situation. Hyperliquid’s commodities contracts—including gold, oil, and silver—experienced unprecedented liquidity and trading volume, with silver contracts alone reaching over $3.5 billion in daily volume at their peak. The platform’s HIP-3 market, trade.xyz, saw weekend trading volumes hit all-time highs, attracting large institutional and high-net-worth users due to its transparency, lack of trading restrictions, and non-custodial nature. In contrast, centralized exchanges (CEXs), though also offering real-world asset (RWA) trading, lacked the same level of visibility and trust among sophisticated traders. Hyperliquid’s upcoming HIP-4 feature introduces outcome-based contracts for prediction and options-like products, further expanding its role as a platform for pricing uncertainty. The growth of perp DEXs reflects a broader trend toward 24/7, globally accessible financial markets, though regulatory challenges remain a potential risk.

marsbit03/20 03:16

Prediction Markets Take Center Stage, But Perp DEXs Quietly Profit from the US-Iran War

marsbit03/20 03:16

Three Years Later: How Has AI Evolved from a 'Chat Tool'?

Three years ago, AI was primarily seen as a novel tool for chatting, image generation, and entertainment—products like ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Character.AI were used more for demonstration than daily reliance. The evolution occurred in two major phases. First, AI became embedded into established applications like CapCut, Canva, and Notion, transforming from a feature into core infrastructure. Platforms diverged: ChatGPT aimed to become a super-app entry point for consumer internet use, while Claude evolved into a professional operating system for knowledge work, creating sticky platform flywheels through integration into calendars, email, and workflows. The true breakthrough emerged recently as AI shifted from generating content to executing tasks autonomously. AI agents like OpenClaw now decompose goals, retrieve information, process data, and deliver results without human intervention. Simultaneously, "Vibe Coding" tools (e.g., Cursor, Replit) enable AI to build entire software products based on human-defined objectives. This progression toward autonomous action is naturally aligning AI with Web3. Blockchain offers machine-native interfaces, programmable assets, and 24/7 operational capability, allowing AI to execute and settle transactions trustlessly without human intermediaries. Together, AI and Web3 are forming the foundational stack for the next internet—where AI acts, and Web3 enables seamless, auditable machine-to-machine coordination and commerce.

marsbit03/20 03:00

Three Years Later: How Has AI Evolved from a 'Chat Tool'?

marsbit03/20 03:00

The Truth About Bitcoin Security: Beyond Hash Power, Law is the Bottom Line

The article "The Truth About Bitcoin Security: Beyond Hash Power, Law is the Bottom Line" by Craig Wright challenges the common narrative that Bitcoin operates outside legal frameworks. It argues that the standard economic model, which assumes anonymous miners and a lawless environment, is outdated and inaccurate for large-scale transactions. Bitcoin mining is now dominated by industrialized, identifiable entities—large, publicly-listed companies and regulated mining pools—not anonymous actors. For small transactions (e.g., under a few million dollars), pure protocol security (proof-of-work) suffices, as legal action is economically unfeasible. However, for large transactions, legal and organizational mechanisms become critical. A double-spend attack by an identifiable mining pool would trigger legal consequences, including criminal charges, asset seizures, and reputational damage, making such attacks economically irrational. The mining industry’s structure—reliant on specialized ASICs, long-term capital investments, and relationships with regulated entities—creates inherent disincentives for attacks. Mining pools would face capital destruction, contributor defection, and legal sanctions if they attempted fraud. Thus, Bitcoin’s security is not solely based on computational cost but also on legal accountability and economic deterrence. The conclusion is that Bitcoin’s security relies on a dual mechanism: protocol-level security for small transactions and legal-institutional security for large ones. Law and protocol are complementary, not opposing forces. The evolution of Bitcoin’s mining industry has naturally embedded it within legal frameworks, making it more secure and robust than purely "lawless" models suggest.

marsbit03/20 01:35

The Truth About Bitcoin Security: Beyond Hash Power, Law is the Bottom Line

marsbit03/20 01:35

活动图片