2026-04-17 Пятница

Новостной центр - Страница 1005

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, processes near-Nasdaq-level perpetual trading volumes but captures significantly lower fees compared to centralized platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood. While Hyperliquid cleared $205.6 billion in notional volume over 30 days, it generated only $80.3 million in fees—an effective take rate of ~3.9 bps. In contrast, Coinbase and Robinhood achieve take rates of ~35.5 bps and ~33.5 bps, respectively, by operating as retail brokers that monetize multiple layers: distribution, balances, subscriptions, and order flow. This gap stems from a structural difference: Hyperliquid positions itself as a low-fee *market layer* (like Nasdaq), providing high-throughput execution and清算 infrastructure, while brokers like Coinbase control user relationships and extract value through higher-margin activities. Hyperliquid’s model includes permissionless distributor frontends (Builder Codes) and product deployment (HIP-3), which drive ecosystem growth but also create long-term fee compression risks by outsourcing high-value distribution. To defend its economics, Hyperliquid is taking steps to retain distribution control, integrate HIP-3 markets natively, and introduce balance-driven revenue streams like USDH (a native stablecoin with 50% reserve收益 sharing) and portfolio margin (10% interest fee on borrows). These moves aim to shift its model from pure exchange-level execution toward a hybrid approach that captures broker-like profit pools—without sacrificing its core infrastructure advantages. The key challenge remains balancing open ecosystem growth with tighter economic integration to avoid being commoditized as a wholesale execution venue.

marsbit12/18 07:03

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

marsbit12/18 07:03

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

The 2025 public blockchain landscape reveals a stark divide between hype and reality, with a severe concentration of value and widespread "zombification" of projects. Analysis of DeFiLlama's on-chain fee data exposes a critical structural issue: the crypto space is dominated by a "profit concentration and long-tail zombie" era. Notable examples highlight this crisis. Algorand, a chain with a $1 billion market cap and advanced technology, generated a mere $17 in daily fees, while Cardano, a top-10 asset, saw only around $6,000. These "classic chains" are likened to empty, expensive cities with no real economic activity. The biggest value capturers are not the most technologically elegant chains. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, succeeding as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers—crypto's only true mass-adoption use case. Solana ($600k daily) thrives as a high-frequency casino for meme coins and speculation, and Base ($105k daily) demonstrates that distribution (via Coinbase) is more critical than pure technology. The only validated business models generating significant fees are low-cost payments, high-frequency speculation, and, to a lesser extent, Ethereum's asset settlement layer. The VC-driven model is failing. New chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which raised hundreds of millions, show a severe disconnect between their high valuations and meager daily fee revenue (ranging from $320 to $12,000). Their lifecycle often follows a "pump and dump" pattern: VC funding -> airdrop farming -> token listing -> user exodus -> collapsed on-chain activity. The industry suffers from a massive oversupply of block space with a dire lack of killer applications. The article concludes that investors must shift from valuing narratives to scrutinizing financials. They should avoid "zombie coins" with high valuations and negligible fees, focus on chains with organic, fee-generating demand, acknowledge that distribution and community are now more valuable than pure tech, and see through the VC subsidy game. This is a necessary market correction; only by paying for real, generated value—not promised future stories—can the industry achieve healthy growth.

比推12/18 06:36

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

比推12/18 06:36

Will Japan's Interest Rate Hike Trigger a Global Liquidity Shock?

As the Bank of Japan's December 19 monetary policy meeting approaches, market concerns are rising over a potential hawkish interest rate hike. A report by Western Securities on December 16 analyzes whether this move could end the era of cheap yen and trigger a global liquidity crisis. Key drivers for a rate hike include Japan’s sustained inflation above the 2% target, low unemployment supporting wage growth, and expansionary fiscal policy. These factors may push the BOJ toward tightening, raising fears of unwinding large-scale carry trades and causing global financial stress. However, the report suggests the most dangerous phase of liquidity shock may have already passed. Previous rate hikes in July and January had diminishing market impact, speculative short positions in yen have largely been closed, and the macro environment—including a resilient U.S. economy and Fed easing—reduces urgency for rapid unwinding. The Fed’s expanded balance sheet also acts as a buffer. Despite theoretical stability, global markets remain fragile after a six-year bull run, with elevated valuations and AI-related泡沫 concerns. A BOJ hike could act as a catalyst for a liquidity shock, though any sharp sell-off may prompt stronger Fed easing, leading to a quick recovery. Investors are advised to monitor the situation closely. If U.S. markets experience repeated “stock-bond-currency triple sell-offs,” it may signal a liquidity crisis. Over the medium term, global monetary easing is expected to continue, supporting gold and China assets—especially AH shares—on yuan appreciation and capital inflows. U.S. stocks and bonds may face volatility.

marsbit12/18 06:11

Will Japan's Interest Rate Hike Trigger a Global Liquidity Shock?

marsbit12/18 06:11

活动图片