快速了解什么是Core及项目进度

MirrorОпубликовано 2023-01-05Обновлено 2023-01-09

Введение

Core是一条面向Web3.0的全新公链,采用Satoshi Plus共识机制,比特币矿工可以通过共享算力来获得额外的CORE代币收入。

Core是一条面向Web3.0的全新公链,采用Satoshi Plus共识机制,比特币矿工可以通过共享算力来获得额外的CORE代币收入。并且Core是一条图灵完备的区块链,兼容以太坊虚拟机(EVM)。

Core为了解决区块链的不可能三角问题,融合了比特币PoW和以太坊DPoS两条链的共识优势,提出了Satoshi Plus共识,完美解决了去中心化、安全性、可扩展性的三角困境。

通过Satoshi Plus Consensus,Core可以保持去中心化,而不会出现传统 PoW 共识系统中出现的性能权衡。此外,Core的混合挖矿机制基于比特币算力和CORE的抵押委托,这使得任何人都可以轻易参与到挖矿中来。

0

项目测试网

CoreDAO目前还处于测试网阶段,大家可以通过Satoshi APP进行测试挖矿,点击下载APP。在撰写本文时,CORE 已经有了下面亮眼的运营数据:

● 7000 万次 APP 下载

● 处理了 6540 万笔交易

● 137 万个地址

● 1110 万矿工

● Twitter 上有140万粉丝

● Discord 上有19.7万名成员

关于测试网的运行情况,大家可以通过测试网浏览器查看。

创世纪阶段

● CORE 的共识机制的 DPoS 部分将使用类似于以太坊等其他权益证明协议的功能来保护网络。

● 同时,从一开始就设计并准备好整合来自比特币挖矿生态系统的委托哈希算力,不会给比特币矿工带来额外成本。比特币矿工的参与最终将通过将其共识锚定在比特币的去中心化网络中来强化 CORE 网络。

0

早期主网阶段

CORE将专注于将比特币矿工带入网络。

● 为了激励早期采用,比特币算力的早期委托人将有资格获得激励奖励计划

● 这些计划增加了矿工通过委托他们的比特币算力而有机地获得的回报

将比特币算力委托给CORE网络的早期矿工将有三种货币化回报:激励奖励、基本奖励和交易费用(如果他们选择运行验证器)。这些早期的努力有助于进一步分散网络的安全设备,并加强比特币矿工与 CORE 网络之间的共生关系。

0

后期主网阶段

比特币的基础奖励将在 2040 年枯竭,CORE网络仍将存在,为比特币矿工提供额外奖励。通过这种方式,CORE的奖励就像额外比特币区块补贴。结合非常轻量级的实施,将比特币算力委托给CORE网络对于比特币矿工来说将是很不错的回报。通过为比特币矿工提供额外的收入机会,Satoshi Plus同时加强了CORE和比特币网络。

0

CoreDAO Staker 的被动收入

CORE持有者可以通过在Satoshi APP中称为DPoS的过程进行质押来赚币。CORE的质押者可以将他们质押的份额委托给验证者。

通过质押这些资产,用户分散了验证者获得的激励和奖励。验证者选择奖励利益相关者的多少,并受到激励使其变得有价值。

在这种关系下,委托的验证者可以以更大的能力努力达成共识。这进一步民主化了CORE区块链的共识机制,同时为线下的利益相关者提供奖励。

0

小结

目前Core的主网上线时间尚未确定,大家静静等待就好,毕竟测试网已经很成熟,主网上线时间不会太久。火必在12月30日发布公告,称将在Core主网上线后第一时间做上线审核,这也说明正式主网即将到来。

Похожее

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit17 мин. назад

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit17 мин. назад

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit20 мин. назад

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit20 мин. назад

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit40 мин. назад

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit40 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片