Weekly Token Unlocks: STRK Unlocks 4% of Circulating Supply but Price Surges

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-10Обновлено 2026-05-10

Введение

Weekly Token Unlock Recap: STRK's 4% Supply Release Sees Price Rally This week's major token unlocks featured two prominent Ethereum scaling solutions: **Starknet (STRK):** Approximately 130 million STRK tokens (4% of circulating supply), valued at roughly $7.19 million, were unlocked. Starknet is an Ethereum Layer 2 network utilizing zk-STARKs technology to enable faster and cheaper transactions. Despite the significant supply increase, the token's price experienced an upward movement. **Arbitrum (ARB):** Around 95.87 million ARB tokens, worth approximately $13.71 million, were released. Arbitrum is another leading Ethereum Layer 2 solution that processes transactions off-chain before bundling them for Ethereum mainnet settlement, offering improved scalability and lower costs. The ARB token grants holders governance rights within the ecosystem. Both projects continue to play significant roles in scaling the Ethereum network.

Starknet

Project Twitter: https://twitter.com/Starknet

Project Website: https://starknet.io/

Tokens Unlocked This Round: 130 million

Value of Unlocked Tokens: Approximately $7.19 million USD

Starknet is a Layer 2 for Ethereum, utilizing zk-STARKs technology to make Ethereum transactions faster and cheaper. Its parent company, StarkWare, was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in Israel. StarkWare's main products include Starknet and StarkEx. By using STARKs, Starknet verifies transactions and computations without requiring every network node to validate each operation. This significantly reduces the computational load and increases the throughput of the blockchain network.

Arbitrum

Project Twitter: https://twitter.com/arbitrum

Project Website: https://arbitrum.io/

Tokens Unlocked This Round: 95.87 million

Value of Unlocked Tokens: Approximately $13.71 million USD

Arbitrum is an Ethereum Rollup designed to enhance Ethereum's scalability. It aggregates and processes transactions off-chain before submitting a single transaction to the Ethereum mainnet. This means users can enjoy faster and cheaper transactions while still benefiting from the security and decentralization of the Ethereum network. The native token of Arbitrum is ARB. ARB holders can participate in the decision-making process, such as proposing and voting on protocol upgrades or changes.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, which project will unlock 1.3 billion tokens this week?

AAccording to the article, Starknet (STRK) will unlock 1.3 billion tokens this week.

QWhat is the approximate USD value of Arbitrum's (ARB) token unlock mentioned in the article?

AThe approximate USD value of Arbitrum's token unlock mentioned in the article is $13.71 million.

QWhat core technology does Starknet use to scale Ethereum transactions?

AStarknet uses zk-STARKs technology to scale Ethereum transactions, making them faster and cheaper.

QWhat is the primary purpose of the Arbitrum network as described in the text?

AThe primary purpose of the Arbitrum network is to increase Ethereum's scalability by aggregating and processing transactions off-chain before submitting them to the Ethereum mainnet.

QWhat role do ARB token holders have within the Arbitrum ecosystem?

AARB token holders can participate in governance, such as proposing and voting on protocol upgrades or changes within the Arbitrum ecosystem.

Похожее

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit4 мин. назад

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit4 мин. назад

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit14 мин. назад

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit14 мин. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit28 мин. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit28 мин. назад

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit31 мин. назад

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit31 мин. назад

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

In drafting the GENIUS Act, Congress prohibited licensed payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders—a rule that forced changes for USDC. However, Ethena's USDe, a rapidly growing "yield dollar," operates outside this regulation. USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic dollar backed by crypto collateral and hedged perpetual futures positions, generating yield from funding rates rather than traditional reserves. Because it doesn't fit the legal definition of a payment stablecoin, the GENIUS Act's restrictions do not apply. USDe's supply peaked above $14 billion in 2025, making it a top-three dollar-denominated crypto asset. Its model carries distinct risks, notably dependence on sustained positive funding rates and vulnerability during market deleveraging events, as seen in a brief depeg in October 2025. Regulatory approaches differ: Germany's BaFin banned USDe sales, viewing it as an unregistered security, while U.S. institutional capital, like Janus Henderson, has embraced it for treasury management. The GENIUS Act defined and regulated payment stablecoins but left synthetic dollars like USDe in a gray area. The unresolved question is whether future regulations will address this category or if yield will continue migrating to undefined spaces.

marsbit33 мин. назад

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

marsbit33 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на 4 (4) представлены ниже.

Weekly Token Unlocks: STRK Unlocks 4% of Circulating Supply but Price Surges

Введение

Starknet

Arbitrum

Связанные с этим вопросы

Похожее

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

Торговля

Популярные статьи

Как купить 4

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 4: В 2025 году экосистема TRON переживает взрывной рост, TRON укрепляет позиции лидера по переводу стейблкоинов

Обсуждения

Топ вопросы

Популярные категории

Популярные теги