Crypto Regulation: Polish Parliament Fails To Overturn Presidential Veto Again

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-04-19Обновлено 2026-04-19

Введение

Poland's Parliament has again failed to override President Karol Narcowski's veto of the Crypto Asset Market Act, which aimed to align national regulations with the EU's MICA framework. The vote fell short of the required majority, marking the second unsuccessful attempt to pass the legislation. The President has consistently opposed the bill, citing overregulation, ambiguity, and increased burdens on small businesses. Government ministers criticized the veto, with the Finance Minister warning that the lack of regulation fosters a risky environment for investors. Prime Minister Donald Tusk also accused Poland's largest crypto exchange, Zondacrypto, of having alleged ties to Russian intelligence and funding opposition politicians, linking these concerns to the legislative push. The government has vowed to continue its efforts to pass the bill.

Once again, Poland’s Parliament has failed to override the presidential veto of a controversial piece of cryptocurrency legislation, deepening tensions between the country’s legislative branch and its head of state.

Polish Lawmakers Face Consecutive Defeat Against Nawrocki Over Crypto Bill

According to a local media outlet, TVP World, members of the lower house of the Polish Parliament, i.e., Sejm, failed to reach the required third-fifth majority to overturn a second presidential veto of the Crypto Asset Market Act. President Karol Narcowski initially vetoed the cryptocurrency regulation bill in December 2025, citing overregulation, ambiguity, and an increased regulatory burden on small businesses.

The Polish lawmakers, led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, failed to override this first veto, which would have aligned Poland’s digital asset regulations with the general European Union’s MICA regulations. In February, the same measure was passed again and vetoed by President Narcowski, citing the same reasons as before.

In an attempt to bypass the President’s assent, the lawmakers held a vote on Friday, with 191 members of parliament voting in favor of the veto and 243 dissenting. Ultimately, this result fell short of the constitutionally required 263 votes to override the President’s veto in Poland. According to Narcowski in December, the proposed digital asset regulation “threatens the freedom of Poles, their property, and the stability of the state.”

Polish Ministers React To Foiled Override Attempt

Following Friday’s botched efforts to pass the Crypto Asset Market Act, several members of the Polish Parliament have responded in various ways.

Finance Minister Andrzej Domański strongly criticized President Narcowski’s veto, stating that the absence of updated regulations compromised the integrity of the Polish digital asset market. Domanski described the present environment as an environment of fraudsters that threatens the protection of investors and entrepreneurs.

Another interesting aspect of this regulation is Prime Minister Tusk’s recent allegations against Poland’s largest exchange, Zondacrypto, which has also lobbied against the Crypto Asset Market Act. Prime Minister Tusk claimed that Zondacrypto was established by Russia mafia, and resources linked to the Russian intelligence agencies.

Considering these funding sources, Tusk questions the exchange’s involvement in Polish politics, citing reports from security agencies that the company’s CEO, Przemysław Kral, has donated to opposition candidates.

Interior Minister Marcin Kierwiński linked the push for the Crypto Asset Market Act to this government concern, stating:

The plan is to keep addressing this until we succeed, until the awareness of the threats and these strange interests connecting certain right-wing politicians with this [cryptocurrency] exchange finally reaches the president.

Total crypto market cap valued at $2.52 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the main reason given by President Karol Narcowski for vetoing the Crypto Asset Market Act in December 2025?

APresident Karol Narcowski cited overregulation, ambiguity, and an increased regulatory burden on small businesses as the main reasons for vetoing the Crypto Asset Market Act.

QHow many votes were required to override the presidential veto in Poland's Parliament, and did they succeed?

A263 votes were constitutionally required to override the presidential veto, but the attempt failed with 191 votes in favor and 243 dissenting, falling short of the required majority.

QWhat did Finance Minister Andrzej Domański claim about the current state of the Polish digital asset market due to the lack of updated regulations?

AFinance Minister Andrzej Domański stated that the absence of updated regulations compromises the integrity of the Polish digital asset market, creating an environment of fraudsters that threatens investor and entrepreneur protection.

QWhat allegation did Prime Minister Donald Tusk make against Zondacrypto, Poland's largest cryptocurrency exchange?

APrime Minister Donald Tusk alleged that Zondacrypto was established by the Russian mafia and resources linked to Russian intelligence agencies, and questioned its involvement in Polish politics through donations to opposition candidates.

QWhat was the goal of the Crypto Asset Market Act in relation to European Union regulations?

AThe Crypto Asset Market Act aimed to align Poland's digital asset regulations with the European Union's MICA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations.

Похожее

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit1 ч. назад

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.2k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2025.03.21

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.2k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片