加密货币与金融业巨头揭示X Money的推出意味着什么

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-04-18Обновлено 2026-04-18

Введение

加密货币和金融行业巨头对埃隆·马斯克推出的X Money表示担忧。美国参议院银行委员会成员伊丽莎白·沃伦警告称，此举将威胁金融稳定。沃伦在致马斯克的信中指出，X Money计划与曾受FDIC处罚的Cross River银行合作，并质疑其高收益承诺的合理性。她还强调X平台存在允许受制裁组织募资、未能处理儿童虐待内容及数据隐私问题。此外，沃伦警告马斯克可能通过《GENIUS法案》为自家金融产品规避监管。X需在4月21日前提交风险说明报告。另一方面，分析师认为X Money凭借5.5亿月活用户将对Robinhood等金融科技公司构成巨大威胁，其内置的实时资产数据查询和经纪服务已逐步上线。

加密货币和金融行业领袖对埃隆·马斯克提出的X Money表示担忧。这包括参议院银行委员会成员伊丽莎白·沃伦参议员，她警告称此举将威胁金融稳定。

伊丽莎白·沃伦参议员质疑埃隆·马斯克的X Money

沃伦参议员在致埃隆·马斯克的信函中，对计划于4月推出的支付平台X Money表示担忧。她指出，该支付平台的推出进展引发了重大的消费者权益、金融稳定和国家安全问题。

沃伦特别提到，X Money可能与Cross River Bank合作，而该银行在2023年曾因不安全、不稳健的经营行为遭到联邦存款保险公司（FDIC）的严肃执法处罚。她还强调X Money的宣传材料显示用户存款账户年化收益率最高可达6%，并质疑在联邦基金利率仅为3.75%的情况下，平台计划通过何种高风险投资来实现这一收益。

沃伦同时指出X平台曾允许真主党、胡塞武装等受制裁个体购买认证账户并通过平台募资的不良记录。她补充说明该平台还存在系统性失职行为，包括未能处理儿童性虐待材料、数据隐私违规以及认证用户的广泛欺诈问题。

此外，沃伦对马斯克可能为其金融产品塑造监管环境提出警告，因X Money可能包含稳定币发行计划。她提及《GENIUS法案》中存在"可疑的豁免条款"，允许X此类公司在未完全符合审批要求的情况下发行稳定币，而其他同类企业则需遵守更严格的监管限制。

沃伦参议员要求马斯克在4月21日前提交书面回复，详细说明X Money的推出计划及其可能对消费者、金融稳定和国家安全造成的风险。

对竞争者的威胁

加密货币专家Tat Thang在X平台发帖指出，X Money及该社交媒体平台的其他金融产品将对金融科技公司构成巨大威胁。他特别提到X的金融产品矩阵包含本周刚上线的智能现金标签（Smart Cashtags）功能，用户无需离开X应用即可搜索任何资产代码并查看实时数据。

Thang同时透露X已通过Wealthsimple开通经纪路由服务，而X Money正处于测试阶段，马斯克表示该支付平台最快将于本月公开推出。这位专家认为Robinhood等金融科技公司无法与X竞争，因为该社交媒体平台拥有5.5亿月活用户。他强调X不需要打造最完美的产品，只需在用户日常使用的应用内提供足够好的服务即可。

Связанные с этим вопросы

Q伊丽莎白·沃伦参议员对X Money的推出主要提出了哪些担忧？

A伊丽莎白·沃伦参议员主要提出了四方面担忧：1）X Money可能与被FDIC处罚过的Cross River Bank合作存在风险；2）承诺6%年化收益但投资策略不透明；3）X平台过往存在允许受制裁组织使用、未能有效处理儿童性虐待内容和数据隐私问题；4）马斯克可能通过《GENIUS法案》为自家产品获得监管豁免。

QX Money承诺的6%年化收益率为何引发质疑？

A因为当前联邦基金利率仅为3.75%，要实现6%的高收益率需要进行高风险投资，但X Money并未明确说明投资策略，这引发了对其风险控制和资金安全性的担忧。

QX平台的金融产品对传统金融科技公司构成哪些威胁？

AX平台拥有5.5亿月活用户基数，其内置的金融功能（如智能现金标签、经纪路由服务）可使用户无需离开应用即可完成金融操作。这种生态整合使得传统金融科技公司（如Robinhood）在用户触达和使用便利性上难以竞争。

Q《GENIUS法案》中引起沃伦参议员质疑的特殊条款是什么？

A法案中存在一项‘可疑的豁免条款’，允许像X这样的公司在没有完全获得常规审批和满足监管要求的情况下发行稳定币，这可能导致监管套利和风险控制缺失。

QX Money目前处于哪个发展阶段？预计何时正式推出？

AX Money目前处于测试阶段（beta），根据马斯克透露，该支付平台最快可能在本月（2026年4月）内公开推出。

Похожее

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbit9 мин. назад

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbit9 мин. назад

OpenAI Audited Financial Report: $38.5 Billion Loss in 2025, $19.2 Billion Burned on R&D, Microsoft Takes $17.2 Billion in a Year

OpenAI's audited financials reveal staggering losses. In 2025, the company reported a net loss attributable to OpenAI of $38.53 billion, a dramatic increase from a $5.1 billion loss in 2024. While revenue grew from $3.7 billion in 2024 to $13.07 billion in 2025, costs skyrocketed to $34 billion. A massive $41.55 billion loss from the fair value change of convertible equity and warrant liabilities, tied to its shift to a for-profit structure, significantly contributed to the 2025 result. Research and development spending reached $19.18 billion in 2025. The filings also show OpenAI paid Microsoft approximately $17.2 billion in 2025 for services, including $10.59 billion categorized under "research and development," likely for model training costs. Other major payments included $867 million from SoftBank and $303 million from Microsoft to OpenAI. The report raises serious concerns about the AI company's path to sustainability and profitability, highlighting financial figures far exceeding external expectations.

marsbit17 мин. назад

OpenAI Audited Financial Report: $38.5 Billion Loss in 2025, $19.2 Billion Burned on R&D, Microsoft Takes $17.2 Billion in a Year

marsbit17 мин. назад

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

Tencent's AI office assistant, WorkBuddy, has achieved daily active users (DAU) 3-4 times that of the industry's second-place product, primarily driven by non-technical users like HR, operations, and administrative staff. Its rapid growth, starting with a public beta in March 2026, highlights a key strategic divergence from competitors like OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude Code. Unlike those tools, which originated as developer-focused assistants (in command lines or IDEs) and are now expanding towards office scenarios, WorkBuddy was built from the ground up for non-technical office workers. Its development was user-driven, initiated after腾讯云's team observed non-technical employees using their CodeBuddy coding tool for general tasks. WorkBuddy's design is defined by three core decisions aimed at lowering barriers: 1) Using natural language instead of technical concepts, so users describe their goal without needing to understand prompts or agents. 2) Providing pre-packaged "Skill" templates for common office tasks like data processing, content creation, and research. 3) Natively integrating into existing腾讯 ecosystems like腾讯 Docs and WeChat, making the agent a seamless part of the user's workflow rather than a separate tool. This "scenario encapsulation" approach, prioritizing the shortest path for users to get work done, contrasts with the "underlying capability" focus of Codex and Claude, which offer more flexibility but require more technical setup. Analysts confirm WorkBuddy's leading market position in China by mid-2026, with massive user and request growth following its launch. Recognizing the same trend of surging non-technical adoption, OpenAI and Anthropic are now pivoting their products with features like role-based plugins (Codex) and a simplified desktop interface (Claude Cowork). However, adapting tools built for developers requires significant changes to interaction models and integrations. WorkBuddy currently holds an estimated six-month lead in delivering a complete solution for non-technical office users. Its recently launched enterprise version aims to solidify this advantage. The competition underscores two valid paths: embedding agent capabilities directly into familiar work environments versus building powerful, general-purpose agents that users must learn to access. WorkBuddy's early success demonstrates the effectiveness of the former strategy for mainstream office adoption.

marsbit17 мин. назад

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

marsbit17 мин. назад

Bitcoin Mining Farm Transforms into AI Data Center: Sangha's 'Sell-Out' Decision

"Sangha, a cryptocurrency mining company, is considering selling its recently operational Genesis bitcoin mining facility in Texas. Despite being profitable due to low-cost power (approximately $32/MWh), the company is exploring a sale, joint venture, or strategic partnership, advised by Marathon Capital. The core value of the 19.9MW site lies not in the mining hardware but in its established, scalable power infrastructure—a direct connection to a 180MW solar farm with plans to expand to 110.4MW. This makes it an attractive, ready-to-use asset for AI or high-performance computing (HPC) companies seeking to avoid lengthy permitting and grid connection processes. Sangha's move reflects a broader industry trend where mining operators are pivoting towards higher-value AI compute opportunities. The decision represents a strategic shift from building a long-term 'win-win-win' mining model to capitalizing on the current premium demand for AI-ready power and data center infrastructure."

marsbit48 мин. назад

Bitcoin Mining Farm Transforms into AI Data Center: Sangha's 'Sell-Out' Decision

marsbit48 мин. назад

Dalio's Latest Warning: Don't Get Carried Away by AI, Real Returns on US Stocks in the Next 5-10 Years Could Be -5% to -10%

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns investors against excessive concentration in AI stocks. He argues the current market, dominated by a few AI giants, mirrors historical patterns where revolutionary new technologies lead to high risk, volatility, and uncertainty. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential, Dalio emphasizes that most investors fail at this stage of the cycle by over-concentrating in a handful of leading companies. He cites inherent risks: companies cannot accurately forecast investment needs or external shocks (e.g., monetary policy, geopolitics, taxes), face potential disruption from future technologies and international competition (notably from China), and experience significant price swings. Dalio's core advice is diversification, calling it his "Holy Grail of Investing." He presents a mathematical case that a well-diversified portfolio of 15-20 uncorrelated, good bets offers a superior risk-adjusted return compared to a concentrated position. Dalio also offers a cautious outlook, suggesting U.S. stocks may deliver real returns of -5% to -10% over the next 5-10 years based on valuation and bubble indicators. He concludes that in the face of high uncertainty, the prudent strategy is not to avoid betting entirely, but to avoid large, concentrated bets where one lacks sufficient informational edge. Instead, investors should build a strategically balanced, diversified portfolio.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Dalio's Latest Warning: Don't Get Carried Away by AI, Real Returns on US Stocks in the Next 5-10 Years Could Be -5% to -10%

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ELON (ELON) представлены ниже.

Топ вопросы

Что такое монета Dogelon (ELON) и каково ее происхождение?2025/04/15 02:47

加密货币与金融业巨头揭示X Money的推出意味着什么

Введение

伊丽莎白·沃伦参议员质疑埃隆·马斯克的X Money

对竞争者的威胁

Связанные с этим вопросы

Похожее

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

OpenAI Audited Financial Report: $38.5 Billion Loss in 2025, $19.2 Billion Burned on R&D, Microsoft Takes $17.2 Billion in a Year

With Daily Active Users Reaching 3-4 Times That of the Industry's Second Place, Which Crack in the Office Agent Market Has Tencent's WorkBuddy Torn Open?

Bitcoin Mining Farm Transforms into AI Data Center: Sangha's 'Sell-Out' Decision

Dalio's Latest Warning: Don't Get Carried Away by AI, Real Returns on US Stocks in the Next 5-10 Years Could Be -5% to -10%

Торговля

Популярные статьи

Как купить ELON

Обсуждения

Топ вопросы

Популярные категории

Популярные теги