Bitcoin Recovery Fails To Lift Market Sentiment From Extreme Fear

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-04-17Обновлено 2026-04-17

Введение

Despite Bitcoin's recent recovery to around $74,800, the overall market sentiment remains in "extreme fear," according to the Crypto Fear & Greed Index. The index, which measures investor sentiment based on factors like volatility, social media, and trading volume, is at a value of 23, just inside the extreme fear zone. This marks a continued period of bearish sentiment since late 2025. Although Bitcoin's rally provided a brief uplift in mid-March, the current price movement has not been enough to shift market psychology into a more positive or greedy territory. For sentiment to improve, a sustained bullish momentum may be required.

Data shows the crypto Fear & Greed Index is still inside the extreme fear territory despite the recovery that Bitcoin and other coins have made.

Bitcoin Fear & Greed Index Is Still Pointing At ‘Extreme Fear’

The “Fear & Greed Index” is an indicator created by Alternative that tells us about the average sentiment present among traders in the Bitcoin and wider cryptocurrency markets. The index takes into account for the data of the following five factors to determine the investor mentality: trading volume, market cap dominance, volatility, social media sentiment, and Google Trends.

To represent the market sentiment, the metric makes use of a numerical scale running from zero to hundred. All values on this scale that lie below 47 correspond to a net sentiment of fear, while those above 53 suggest the dominance of greed among investors. Naturally, the values lying between these two cutoffs imply a neutral mentality.

Besides these three main zones, there are also two ‘extreme’ regions called the extreme fear (25 and under) and extreme greed (above 75). Historically, these two have held significance for the market as they have been where major tops and bottoms have tended to form.

The relationship between prices and sentiment has been an inverse one, however, with tops appearing during extreme greed and bottoms alongside extreme fear.

Recently, the crypto sector has been stuck in the latter of the two, as the below chart shows.

How the Fear & Greed Index has changed over the past year | Source: Alternative

The long stay in the extreme fear zone has been a consequence of the bearish action that Bitcoin and other assets have faced since Q4 2025. In mid-March, BTC’s recovery to $75,000 meant that the market saw a temporary respite from rock-bottom sentiment, with the Fear & Greed Index surging to a peak of 28. After the BTC rally fizzled out, however, the sentiment also cooled back deep into the extreme fear zone again.

From the above chart, it’s apparent that in the last few days, the metric has again made some recovery. The uplift in sentiment is due to BTC’s rally toward the $76,000 mark. Unlike the surge from mid-March, though, this one hasn’t yet been able to take the Fear & Greed Index out of the extreme fear region.

As is visible in the meter, the indicator is sitting at a value of 23 right now, which is just inside the extreme fear boundary.

The latest value of the Fear & Greed Index | Source: Alternative

It’s possible that if bull momentum continues in the coming days, the Fear & Greed Index will escape the extreme fear zone. But for now, it seems that the market isn’t convinced about the price rally.

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is floating around $74,800, up nearly 5% in the last seven days.

The price of the coin seems to have been moving sideways since its upward move earlier in the week | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the Bitcoin Fear & Greed Index and what does it measure?

AThe Bitcoin Fear & Greed Index is an indicator created by Alternative that measures the average sentiment among traders in the Bitcoin and wider cryptocurrency markets. It uses a numerical scale from 0 to 100, taking into account five factors: trading volume, market cap dominance, volatility, social media sentiment, and Google Trends.

QWhat value on the Fear & Greed Index represents 'extreme fear' and what is its historical significance?

AValues of 25 and below on the Fear & Greed Index represent 'extreme fear.' Historically, this zone has been significant for the market as major bottoms have tended to form during periods of extreme fear.

QDespite Bitcoin's recent price recovery, what is the current reading of the Fear & Greed Index?

ADespite Bitcoin's recent rally toward $76,000, the Fear & Greed Index is currently sitting at a value of 23, which is still inside the extreme fear territory.

QWhat was the peak value the Fear & Greed Index reached during Bitcoin's mid-March recovery to $75,000?

ADuring Bitcoin's mid-March recovery to $75,000, the Fear & Greed Index surged to a peak of 28, providing a temporary respite from the rock-bottom sentiment.

QWhat is the inverse relationship between market sentiment and Bitcoin prices mentioned in the article?

AThe article states that the relationship between prices and sentiment has been inverse, with major tops in the market tending to form during periods of extreme greed, while major bottoms have typically occurred alongside extreme fear.

Похожее

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit25 мин. назад

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbit31 мин. назад

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbit31 мин. назад

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbit32 мин. назад

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbit32 мин. назад

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point