iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-04-21Обновлено 2026-04-21

Введение

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness...

By New Product Insight Finance, Author|Wu Wenwu

After iQiyi launched its AI artist library, multiple artists quickly denied signing any AI-related authorizations, sparking heated discussions. Behind this, iQiyi, which is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, is clearly too impatient.

01 “iQiyi Is Crazy” Trends on Hot Search

At the 2026 iQiyi World Conference held on April 20, iQiyi officially announced the launch of its "AI Artist Library," with over a hundred artists already onboard. Names like Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, Wang Churan, and Li Yitong appeared on the big screen list.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu, in his speech, made remarks such as "AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14, giving everyone more time to rest" and "in the future, live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage," which further fueled the discussion.

Several topics related to iQiyi quickly trended on hot searches, with the topic "iQiyi Is Crazy" even reaching the number one spot on Weibo's hot search list that day, drawing widespread attention and discussion.

However, iQiyi was quickly contradicted. After the list was released, multiple artists including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan urgently issued statements clearly denying having signed any AI-related authorizations. For example, Zhang Ruoyun's studio was the first to state that they had not signed any AI-related authorization and that their legal team was handling the matter urgently.

iQiyi officials had to quickly respond, stating that joining the iQiyi Nado Pro Artist Library indicates the artist's willingness to engage in AI film and television projects, but participation in any specific project or role requires separate negotiation and authorization.

iQiyi wants to build an AI artist library to provide a standardized platform for AIGC creators, making it easier for them to select artists and efficiently communicate collaboration details through iQiyi with the artists' representatives.

From the artists' perspective, being aware of such a matter but not having signed an authorization agreement is something that artists, who highly value their portrait rights, IP value, and commercial value, clearly cannot accept. It even touches their bottom line.

From the netizens' point of view, iQiyi's move is somewhat excessive. Some netizens commented that this seems like releasing the list first to pressure the artists into compliance. Others said the platform is treating actors as "consumables" without even a heads-up.

The incident also sparked discussions about the legal issues surrounding AI artists. Some lawyers reminded that an actor authorizing their image does not mean AI entities can freely use their likeness; portrait license agreements should clearly define the scope, duration, and manner of use.

From the perspectives of iQiyi, artists, users, and netizens, the considerations, usage points, value points, and impacts of AI are entirely different.

02 iQiyi Is Too Impatient

In recent years, talking about the long-form video platform iQiyi always evokes different images and opinions from the outside world.

For instance, whenever a hit TV series or web drama airs on iQiyi, it sparks discussions about iQiyi's ability to create hit shows and the commercial returns it brings.

However, more of the discussion we hear about iQiyi concerns how short video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou have stolen users away, diverting user attention, especially with the popularity of micro-dramas, leading more people to abandon long-form video platforms.

According to the "China Network Audiovisual Development Research Report (2026)" released at the Network Audiovisual Conference in April 2026, the average daily time spent on micro-dramas was 129 minutes (December 2025).

iQiyi also faces competition from platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. "New Product Insight Finance" noted that many mid-to-long form videos on Bilibili now are not inferior to iQiyi in terms of category, quantity, and quality. Xiaohongshu is not just a content discovery platform; its short video content has also risen.

iQiyi's anxiety and pressure have long been directly reflected in its financial reports. According to iQiyi's financial report, for the full year 2025 ended December 31, 2025, the company's total revenue was 27.29 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 6.62%, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth after a 7.97% drop in 2024.

Notably, regarding profit calculations, the non-GAAP operating profit was 640 million yuan, a significant drop of about 73% compared to 2.36 billion yuan in 2024; calculated according to US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), iQiyi turned from profit to loss, with a net loss of 206 million yuan. In 2023, the company's net profit had peaked at 1.93 billion yuan.

In the fourth quarter, iQiyi's total revenue was 6.79 billion yuan, achieving both year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth. The non-GAAP operating profit was 140 million yuan.

Facing intense competitive pressure and realistic operational pressure, iQiyi urgently needs to tell a new story. As all internet companies are successively telling their AI stories, iQiyi, not wanting to be left behind, has begun to constantly push its new AI narrative.

In the second half of 2025, iQiyi targeted areas like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI children's animation. During the earnings conference call in February 2026, it introduced a C-end story: AI character interaction, the Tao Dou World where users and virtual stars/IP characters chat in real-time and co-create storylines, and personalized AI editing that automatically clips highlights, secondary creations, and mashup videos for users.

Then came iQiyi's latest release: the official launch of Nado Pro + 100 artists' AI digital avatars, which unexpectedly caused such a controversy.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu also stated that the goal is to have a commercial AI blockbuster by this summer, or at the latest, this autumn.

In the view of "New Product Insight Finance," AI has become iQiyi's current lowest-cost and fastest-acting storyline, hoping to tell a new story and find a new growth point to boost market confidence.

At the end of March this year, iQiyi announced it had submitted an application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in a confidential manner to advance its listing in Hong Kong. iQiyi now needs to tell a new story to the capital market even more.

Clearly, for various reasons, iQiyi is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, but it is obviously being too impatient.

Senior media personality Hu Xijin commented on the iQiyi AI artist library incident, saying, "iQiyi高调宣布117位演员签约AI影视艺人库,并表示未来真人实拍可能将成非遗,我个人感觉很吃惊。" (iQiyi高调 announced that 117 actors signed with the AI film and television artist library and stated that live-action filming might become intangible cultural heritage in the future. Personally, I was very surprised.). Hu also clearly stated, "爱奇艺过于急功近利了。" (iQiyi is too impatient for quick success and instant benefit.).

03 iQiyi's AI Considerations

This release of the AI artist library by iQiyi was originally intended to be a major move, but it unexpectedly led to denial statements from multiple artists and sparked extensive discussions about iQiyi and the broader context of AI in film and television.

Every technological update and iteration profoundly impacts the video industry and long-form video platforms like iQiyi. For example, the last shift was from the PC era to the internet, followed by the popularity of short videos impacting long-form videos, forcing iQiyi to respond.

The latest wave of AI technology has an even greater impact on film, television, video, and video platforms. iQiyi can only embrace AI and continuously tell its new AI stories.

The application of AI in film and television is an inevitable trend, but its use in the industry has distinctly contrasting A and B sides; it is a double-edged sword.

On one hand, AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize creative processes, and improve production efficiency. In film shooting and post-production editing, AI is a magical tool.

On the other hand, although AI technology has advanced noticeably and reached a stage where the "fake" can seem real, AI creation has become data-driven, modular, and formulaic.

For example, the AI short dramas flooding short video platforms are full of plots like domineering CEOs and reincarnation reversals. The stories and tropes are highly similar, even with the same script generating different AI versions, making them very homogeneous and assembly-line like.

Therefore, iQiyi's first consideration is whether it should launch more AI tools, become an AI platform, or become the protagonist of AI? Yangtze Evening News commented on this, saying, "iQiyi, you were meant to embrace AI, not become AI."

At least for now, AI remains an辅助技术手段和工具 (auxiliary technological means and tool). AI stories will become more diverse in the future and will continue to progress.

The second consideration for iQiyi is: cold AI versus the sense of real people, who do audiences prefer?

For a long-form video platform like iQiyi, its core competitiveness still lies in high-quality IP, strong production capabilities, and the ability to produce hit web dramas and TV series. The key to these works is the script, the actors' performances, and the viewing experience they provide to the audience.

If there is too much AI in the works, even the main characters become AI, then the cold sense of AI will only intensify.

Viewers, especially iQiyi members, will always care more about the sense of real people in an excellent work, as the emotional expression and changes of a character can never be replaced by AI.

iQiyi should adopt different strategies. For instance, it can heavily promote AI in works like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI movies, but producing a high-quality work with AI is not necessarily low cost.

iQiyi's third consideration is to balance the interests of multiple parties: the platform, artists, and audiences.

As mentioned earlier, from the perspective of different participants in iQiyi's release of the AI artist library, there are indeed different starting points and considerations. Particularly, how to gain artist acceptance is a key point. Of course, the most important point is still the audience's acceptance of AI works.

In 2025, after the AI-generated "actor" Tilly Norwood emerged, the US Screen Actors Guild, followed by European and Canadian actors' unions,相继表态“坚决反对用合成角色替代真人演员” (successively stated they "resolutely oppose using synthetic characters to replace real actors"). Some international consensus suggests that AI can be a tool, but not the protagonist, especially not at the cost of sacrificing the livelihoods of real people and artistic dignity.

If we zoom out to the entire long-form video industry, the considerations brought by AI mentioned above are not just iQiyi's alone; they are shared considerations for everyone.

References:

[1] "iQiyi Is Crazy"? CEO Gong Yu Responds, Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei Issue Emergency Statements, Jiemian News

[2] "iQiyi Is Crazy", You Were Meant to Embrace AI, Not Become AI, Yangtze Evening News

[3] iQiyi Financial Report, iQiyi

(This article does not constitute any investment advice)

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the main controversy surrounding iQiyi's announcement of its 'AI Actor Library'?

AThe main controversy was that multiple actors, including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan, quickly issued statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements, despite being listed as participants. This led to accusations that iQiyi was trying to pressure actors into compliance and sparked a debate about the legal and ethical use of AI in the entertainment industry.

QAccording to the article, what are the two-sided (AB) impacts of AI on the film and television industry?

AThe two-sided impacts are: 1) Positive: AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize the creative process, and improve production efficiency in filming and post-production editing. 2) Negative: AI creation can become data-driven, modular, and formulaic, leading to highly similar, homogeneous, and assembly-line-like content, as seen in the proliferation of similar AI short dramas on platforms.

QWhat financial pressure does iQiyi face, as mentioned in the article, that is driving its push for AI stories?

AiQiyi faced financial pressure with its total revenue for 2025 falling 6.62% year-over-year to 27.29 billion yuan, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth. Its non-GAAP operating profit plummeted by about 73% to 640 million yuan, and it reported a net loss of 206 million yuan under GAAP standards, a significant drop from a net profit of 1.93 billion yuan in 2023.

QWhat three 'thinking questions' or challenges does the article pose for iQiyi regarding its AI strategy?

AThe three thinking questions are: 1) Should iQiyi focus on developing more AI tools and being an AI platform, or should it try to become the main protagonist of AI itself? 2) How does iQiyi balance the appeal of cold AI against the 'living human feeling' that audiences prefer? 3) How can iQiyi balance the interests of the platform, actors, and viewers regarding the use of AI?

QHow did iQiyi's CEO, Gong Yu, contribute to the controversy with his statements at the iQiyi World Conference?

AGong Yu sparked further discussion by stating that 'AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14 dramas, giving them more time to rest' and that 'live-action filming may become a world cultural heritage in the future.' These comments, alongside the AI Actor Library announcement, contributed to topics like 'iQiyi is crazy' trending number one on Weibo and intensified the public debate.

Похожее

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit8 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit8 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手32 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手32 мин. назад

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1 ч. назад

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить AR

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Arweave (AR) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Arweave (AR).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Arweave (AR)После приобретения вами Arweave (AR) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Arweave (AR)С легкостью торгуйте Arweave (AR) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

898 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.03.29Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить AR

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AR (AR) представлены ниже.

活动图片