Tres tokens de gaming – SAND, AXS y MANA – desafían la caída del mercado cripto

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-20Обновлено 2026-01-20

Введение

Tres tokens de gaming, SAND, AXS y MANA, desafían la caída general del mercado cripto con ganancias significativas. SAND sube un 7.55% en 24h, AXS lidera con un 15.77% y MANA avanza un 6.76%. Este comportamiento contrasta con el mercado global, que pierde un 1.90% en capitalización, y con otras criptomonedas principales y memes que registran pérdidas. La incertidumbre en el comercio internacional y los posibles aumentos de tasas de interés del Banco de Japón (BoJ) son factores clave que generan volatilidad. Una decisión del BoJ, que podría cambiar su postura actual, se anunciará el 23 de enero de 2026.

Tres tokens de gaming están desafiando la caída en curso en el mercado cripto global. Se trata de SAND, AXS y MANA, que registran un aumento de entre el 6% y el 15% mientras se escribe este artículo. La actual tendencia a la baja en el mercado cripto tiene sus raíces en la creciente incertidumbre en el comercio internacional, que probablemente se complique aún más después de que el Banco de Japón (BoJ) insinuara una subida de tipos.

Los tokens de gaming en alza

The Sandbox, SAND, ha subido un 7,55% en las últimas 24 horas. Ahora cotiza a 0,1468 dólares. El valor también ha subido un 25,35% en los últimos 7 días. Sin embargo, ha retrocedido casi un 1,94%. Aun así, desafía el impulso del mercado con una subida junto con Axie Infinity (AXS) y Decentraland (MANA).

AXS ha registrado la mayor subida en 24 horas y también en 7 días. El token ha subido un 15,77% y un 110,55% en los plazos respectivos. Ahora cotiza a 2,02 dólares con un ligero descenso del 0,83% en la última hora. MANA ha logrado unas ganancias decentes hasta los 0,1593 dólares. Ha subido un 6,76% en 24 horas y un 10,86% en 7 días.

Cabe destacar que tokens destacados de gaming como RENDER y FLOKI han cedido un 5,08% y un 0,47% en 24 horas, aplicable en el mismo orden.

El mercado cripto global pierde impulso

El mercado cripto global ha perdido su impulso con BTC y ETH probando niveles de resistencia críticos de 90.000 y 3.000 dólares, respectivamente. BNB y SOL intentan recuperar máximos, pero siguen siendo arrastrados a la baja por pérdidas en 24 horas y 7 días. BNB cotiza a 913,16 dólares y SOL a 129,13 dólares.

La lucha del mercado cripto también es evidente en un descenso del 1,90% en su capitalización de mercado junto con un cambio a 42 puntos en el Índice FG. El segmento de memes cripto tampoco tiene muchos ganadores, teniendo en cuenta que DOGE y SHIB han caído un 9,74% y un 8,86% en los últimos 7 días, respectivamente.

¿Aumentará el BoJ la volatilidad?

La volatilidad en el mercado cripto depende de múltiples factores; sin embargo, parte de la atención se centra en el Banco de Japón, o BoJ. Ha insinuado la posibilidad de subir los tipos tras la depreciación del yen. Ayako Fujita, economista jefe de Japón en JPMorgan Securities, ha declarado que el BoJ tiene una postura negativa sobre subir el tipo de forma consecutiva. Ayako, según informa Reuters, añadió que la reciente depreciación del yen podría impulsar un cambio aquí.

Cabe destacar que el BoJ subió los tipos de interés al 0,75% en diciembre del año pasado (2025), alcanzando el nivel más alto en 30 años. Es probable que se anuncie una decisión el 23 de enero de 2026, entre las 03:30 y las 04:30 GMT.

Noticias cripto destacadas de hoy:

Bermuda se asocia con Circle y Coinbase para la primera economía nacional on-chain del mundo

Связанные с этим вопросы

Q¿Qué tres tokens de gaming están desafiando la caída del mercado cripto?

ALos tres tokens de gaming que están desafiando la caída del mercado son SAND, AXS y MANA.

Q¿Cuál fue el porcentaje de aumento de AXS en las últimas 24 horas y 7 días?

AAXS registró un aumento del 15.77% en 24 horas y del 110.55% en 7 días.

Q¿A qué niveles críticos están siendo probados Bitcoin (BTC) y Ethereum (ETH)?

ABitcoin (BTC) está probando el nivel crítico de $90k y Ethereum (ETH) el de $3k.

Q¿Qué banco central se menciona como un posible impulsor de la volatilidad en el mercado cripto y por qué?

ASe menciona al Banco de Japón (BoJ) porque ha insinuado la posibilidad de subir las tasas de interés debido a la depreciación del yen, lo que podría aumentar la volatilidad.

Q¿Cuándo se espera que el Banco de Japón anuncie su próxima decisión sobre las tasas de interés?

ASe espera que el Banco de Japón anuncie su decisión el 23 de enero de 2026, entre las 03:30 y 04:30 GMT.

Похожее

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

**Wintermute Market Weekly: BTC Rebounds to $60K Lows, But Caution Advised** This week saw a broad market rebound, primarily driven by two converging factors: a US CPI inflation reading that met expectations (4.2% YoY) and former President Trump's announcement of a deal to end the Iran conflict. The latter triggered a sharp drop in oil prices, reducing geopolitical risk premiums and easing inflation fears. Consequently, risk assets like equities and cryptocurrencies rallied, with Bitcoin recovering from lows around $60,000 to close the week up 1.9%, while altcoins gained 3.1%. Despite the price bounce, the underlying liquidity picture for crypto remains weak. Key funding channels—stablecoin flows, ETF inflows, and Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) activity—show no signs of structural improvement. ETF outflows recently hit a record streak, and DAT assets have declined significantly. The rally from $60K to $83K earlier is now viewed as a bear-market rally that has failed. The current environment is characterized by low directional conviction and choppy, range-bound trading, likely persisting into summer. The report advises caution against aggressively buying the dip. While the $60K area offers attractive long-term risk/reward, a sustained bull run requires a visible turnaround in capital inflows, which hasn't materialized. The upcoming FOMC meeting and Powell's commentary, alongside the formal Iran deal signing, are noted as near-term catalysts. The core takeaway is to watch fund flows rather than price action and avoid being whipsawed by volatility before clear signs of institutional or retail capital returning emerge.

marsbit3 мин. назад

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

marsbit3 мин. назад

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

SpaceX announced its acquisition of AI programming startup Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion in an all-stock deal, just days after its record-breaking IPO. The move sent SpaceX's stock soaring, briefly making it the most valuable U.S. company. Cursor, founded in 2022 by MIT graduate Michael Truell and his classmates, is a popular AI coding assistant that allows developers to switch between models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others. It saw explosive revenue growth, reaching a $4 billion annualized run rate in early 2026. However, its market share was eroded by the launch of competitor Claude Code from its key AI supplier, Anthropic. This dependence prompted Cursor to develop its own AI model, Composer, in early 2026. To scale Composer, Cursor needed immense computing power. In April 2026, it struck a deal with SpaceX, granting the latter an option to acquire it post-IPO. SpaceX exercised this option, offering Cursor access to its Colossus supercomputer, powered by hundreds of thousands of top-tier Nvidia AI chips. For SpaceX, the acquisition is a strategic move to bolster its AI capabilities, particularly for its xAI division, and advance its broader ambition of building orbital, solar-powered data centers. While the deal surprised some employees and investors given Truell's earlier stance on independence, it represents a high-stakes partnership. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has projected the company could reach $1 trillion in revenue by 2030. For Truell, joining forces with SpaceX is a monumental gamble on an unprecedented scale in the race for AI dominance.

链捕手5 мин. назад

链捕手5 мин. назад

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

Summary: The article raises concerns about the systemic risks posed by SpaceX's skyrocketing valuation, arguing that modern market mechanics, rather than fundamentals, are driving its price discovery. Following SpaceX's market capitalization surpassing $3 trillion in after-hours trading, the author contends that the market is no longer functioning properly. The core issue is not SpaceX's business prospects but the unhealthy market structure surrounding it. With limited float and the imminent launch of options trading, the stage is set for a potential "gamma squeeze"—a feedback loop where market makers hedging call options are forced to buy shares, pushing the price higher and attracting more speculative momentum traders. This mechanism, seen previously with Tesla and meme stocks, can decouple valuation from financial reality. The danger escalates as extreme valuations force passive funds, ETFs, pensions, and major indices to hold the stock. If SpaceX grows large enough—hypothetically reaching $5 or even $10 trillion—its performance would increasingly dictate broader market indices, embedding systemic risk. The author warns that when price appreciation itself becomes the primary bullish thesis, the market transforms from a capital allocation mechanism into a self-reinforcing speculative machine, endangering the retirement savings of ordinary investors tied to passive strategies. The piece questions whether such a system can still perform its fundamental role of price discovery.

marsbit10 мин. назад

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

marsbit10 мин. назад

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

How much of your $20 Claude Pro subscription actually goes to AI model companies like Anthropic? A viral breakdown image highlights the fundamental valuation challenge for AI applications versus traditional SaaS. Unlike SaaS with high software margins, AI subscriptions face variable "inference costs": every user query consumes GPU time, power, and cloud resources. This creates a tension between fixed subscription fees and usage-driven expenses. While the specific dollar splits are illustrative, the core question is whether AI revenue can achieve SaaS-like margins as usage scales. Currently, infrastructure providers (cloud platforms, GPU makers like Nvidia, HBM suppliers, power/data centers) capture more certain revenue from growing AI usage. Their financials reflect pricing power and faster earnings validation. The bullish case hinges on efficiency improvements: model optimization, caching, smaller models, and custom chips could lower per-token costs over time. The key debate is whether cost declines can outpace increases in user workload complexity and volume. Ultimately, for AI companies to command high SaaS-like valuations, they must demonstrate not just user growth but also improving gross margins after accounting for inference costs. Investors will scrutinize not just subscriber numbers, but usage patterns, enterprise pricing tiers, and real efficiency gains.

marsbit20 мин. назад

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

marsbit20 мин. назад

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbit36 мин. назад

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbit36 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AXS (AXS) представлены ниже.