Linea空投查询已开放,TGE前你必须知道的几件事

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2025-09-04Обновлено 2025-09-04

原创 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者 | Asher(@Asher_ 0210

今日下午,ConsenSys 旗下以太坊 Layer 2 网络 Linea(Linea 项目基本信息可点击此处查看)在 X 平台发文宣布现已开放空投查询(链接:https://linea.build/hub/airdrop),并将于 9 月 10 日 TGE。

因此,Odaily 星球日报快速为大家梳理 Linea TGE 前你需要知道的几件事。

总供应量的 9% 将用于空投且无锁定期

根据官方文档,Linea 代币总供应量为 72,009,990,000 枚,相当于 ETH 初始流通量的 1,000 倍。其分配方式与以太坊的创世分配方式相呼应,以表明其与更广泛的生态系统的长期一致性,即 85% 的供应量专用于生态系统,剩余 15% 分配给 Consensys 国库,代币详细分配比例如下:

  • 早期贡献者:代币总供应量的 10%。其中,早期用户将获得代币总供应量的 9%,并且 TGE 时将进行空投并无锁定期。分配的群体为获得 LXP 的用户。另外的代币总供应量的 1% 将预留给 Linea 生态系统中的战略建设者且 TGE 时完全解锁;
  • 生态系统:代币总供应量的 75%。该部分代币分配给生态系统基金(将设立于一家总部位于美国的非股份制实体),该基金由 Linea 联盟管理(由以太坊原生开发者组成的理事会),成员包括 ENS Labs、Eigen Labs、SharpLink、Status 和 Consensys;
  • 国库:代币总供应量的 15%。该部分代币将锁定五年并且锁定期间不可进行转让,但可以在生态系统内部署,例如作为流动性或质押资金,以支持协议的健康和一致性。

Linea 代币经济模型

此外,在 TGE 时约有 22% 的代币供应量(158 亿 LINEA 代币)将用于流通,其中包括早期贡献者的空投、生态系统激活计划以及流动性供应的分配。

谁有资格获得空投?

至少持有 2000 LXP 或 1500 LXP-L 的用户可获得空投资格(符合条件的地址需满足活跃度门槛,且未被识别为女巫账户)。根据官方信息,空投总计 9,361,298,700 枚 LINEA 分配给 749,662 个符合条件的地址。

此外,Linea 还为部分活跃地址准备了代币加成奖励,具体规则为:

  • EIP-4844 升级前活跃地址:主网上线至 2024 年 3 月 27 日期间至少完成一笔交易。
  • LXP Voyages 活动后活跃地址:2024 年 8 月 1 日(区块高度:7533487)至 2025 年 6 月 30 日(区块高度:20473167)之间,至少有 6 个不同月份进行过合约交互(月份不必连续)。
  • MetaMask 使用地址:在 2025 年 6 月 30 日(区块高度:7533487)之前的任何时间,使用 Linea 的 MetaMask 兑换或桥接、MetaMask 质押或 MetaMask 卡,满足任何一点即可获得 10% 提升(不可叠加)。

(Linea 主网上的地址为:0x1789e0043623282D5DCc7F213d703C6D8BAfBB04)

LXP 等级决定代币分配数量

Linea 的奖励体系采用分级设计,LXP 持有者被划分为七个等级,等级越高,获得的 LINEA 份额越大(LXP 查询链接:https://dune.com/linea/tge-boost-checker),具体 LXP 等级划分为:

  • Tier 1: 2,000 - 2,999 LXP;
  • Tier 2: 3,000 - 3,999 LXP;
  • Tier 3: 4,000 - 4,499 LXP;
  • Tier 4: 4,500 - 4,999 LXP;
  • Tier 5: 5,000 - 6,499 LXP;
  • Tier 6: 6,500 - 7,999 LXP;
  • Tier 7: 8,000+ LXP。

同等级内的分配则与持有数量成正比,例如持有 5500 LXP 的用户将比 5300 LXP 的用户获得更多代币。

空投申领时间与规则

本次空投将从 9 月 10 日正式启动,领取期长达三个月,截止至 12 月 9 日。所有符合条件的代币份额都会一次性释放,用户无需担心归属或分批解锁问题。但如果在期限内未完成申领,份额将在 12 月 9 日之后自动收回,重新注入 Linea 生态系统基金。

仍可参与的空投活动:Linea 流动性激励计划

Linea 官方宣布将启动流动性激励计划 Linea Ignition,计划分发 10 亿 LINEA 代币作为激励,以为 Linea 额外吸引 10 亿美元 TVL。

活动将持续至 2025 年 10 月 26 日,启动阶段符合资格的合作协议包括 Etherex、Aave、Euler,后续预计还将增加 Turtle Club。代币激励中的 40% 将在 10 月 27 日解锁,剩余 60% 在 45 天内线性解锁。

Похожее

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit9 мин. назад

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit9 мин. назад

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手43 мин. назад

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手43 мин. назад

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить LAYER

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Solayer (LAYER) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Solayer (LAYER).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Solayer (LAYER)После приобретения вами Solayer (LAYER) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Solayer (LAYER)С легкостью торгуйте Solayer (LAYER) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

656 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.02.11Обновлено 2025.03.21

Как купить LAYER

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на LAYER (LAYER) представлены ниже.

活动图片