OpenAI Restarts Robotics Business After Six Years, Short-term Bets on Assistive Robots

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-02Last updated on 2026-06-02

Abstract

On June 1st, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company's entry into the physical robotics arena, launching a new "OpenAI Robotics" team. The strategy has short and long-term goals: developing robots to assist technical workers with infrastructure in the near term, and envisioning personal robots for everyone eventually. This marks a return to robotics for OpenAI, which had a team from 2016-2019 before disbanding it to focus on large language models like GPT, leading to ChatGPT. The revival stems from the rapid progress of an internal "Worldsim" research project, now led by Sora co-creator Aditya Ramesh, and a shift in strategy following the end of a partnership with humanoid robotics firm Figure AI in early 2025 due to technical disagreements. OpenAI's approach leverages its leading AI models and "world model" capabilities, aiming to build the "brain" first before the physical body. The move also serves to present a new growth narrative—embodied AI and expansion into the physical world—ahead of its planned 2026 IPO, potentially helping to address investor concerns over its significant ongoing losses.

On June 1, a recruitment post shared by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on social media officially announced the company's entry into the physical robotics track. Altman stated that the company is forming a new team named "OpenAI Robotics" and is publicly recruiting full-stack hardware, operations, systems, and machine learning engineers. The goal is to "co-program and build robots that are truly useful to society."

According to Altman's explanation, OpenAI's robotics strategy has both short-term and long-term goals. In the short term, OpenAI focuses on developing robots that can assist technical workers in building future infrastructure. In the long run, the company envisions a future where every person can own a personal robot capable of fulfilling various needs.

Altman revealed that the move into robotics is based on the rapid development of an internal OpenAI research project called "Worldsim." This project evolved over the past year into OpenAI Robotics, led by the company's Research Vice President, Aditya Ramesh, a core developer of the text-to-image model DALL·E and the video generation model Sora. The project's foundation lies in the deep integration and co-design of robotics hardware research and machine learning research.

OpenAI's return to the robotics field is, in fact, a "comeback." As early as the company's founding days, robotics technology was a crucial direction in its exploration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Between 2016 and 2019, OpenAI successively launched the reinforcement learning benchmark environment OpenAI Gym, the open-source robot simulation platform Roboschool, and successfully developed a dexterous robotic hand named Dactyl.

In 2019, OpenAI, using reinforcement learning and "Automatic Domain Randomization" (ADR) technology, trained an AI system that enabled a humanoid robotic hand to successfully solve a Rubik's Cube. This research proved the feasibility of the technical path of training in a simulation environment and then transferring the capabilities to a real robot. However, due to the scarcity of robotics training data and slow iteration at that time, contrasted with the vast and easily accessible text and image data on the internet, OpenAI made a strategic decision around 2020: to disband the robotics team and concentrate resources on the development of large language models represented by the GPT series. This decision ultimately led to the creation of ChatGPT.

In the following years, OpenAI ignited the global large model boom with its ChatGPT series of products, becoming the world's highest-valued AI unicorn. According to multiple media reports, OpenAI secretly submitted a draft IPO prospectus on May 22, planning to go public as early as September 2026. In its latest round of financing completed in March of this year, OpenAI's valuation reached $852 billion. Institutions like Deutsche Bank predict its listing valuation could exceed $1 trillion, with a fundraising scale potentially reaching $60 billion, potentially making it one of the largest tech IPOs in U.S. public market history.

Nevertheless, OpenAI also faces significant pressure from substantial losses. The company is projected to incur a full-year loss of approximately $14 billion in 2026, with cash burn expected to further expand. It might not achieve cash flow break-even until 2030 at the earliest. Its gross margin is only about 33%, with the high inference costs of AI models being the primary reason for eroding profits.

During the years after disbanding its in-house robotics team, OpenAI did not completely abandon the robotics track. Instead, it adopted a "multi-point investment" strategy through its venture fund, successively investing in several robotics startups, including the Norwegian humanoid robot company 1X Technologies, the American humanoid robot star company Figure AI, and Physical Intelligence.

The most notable collaboration was with Figure AI in February 2024. At that time, OpenAI not only participated in Figure AI's $675 million Series B funding round but also announced the development of a dedicated multimodal AI model for Figure's humanoid robots. Just 13 days after the partnership was announced, the Figure 01 humanoid robot equipped with the OpenAI model demonstrated fluent natural language interaction, object recognition, and autonomous operation capabilities.

However, this collaboration lasted less than a year. In February 2025, Figure AI founder Brett Adcock officially announced the termination of the partnership with OpenAI, opting to independently develop an end-to-end robot AI model. The primary reason for the breakdown was a divergence in technical approaches. Figure believed that general-purpose large models could not adapt to the hardware requirements of robots; it was essential to create a vertically integrated end-to-end model. This also prompted OpenAI, after a six-year hiatus, to choose to "revive" its robotics team, personally entering the field and upgrading robotics from an "investment" to an "internal strategic business."

Simultaneously, this is also OpenAI's move to outline a new growth narrative for the capital market ahead of its IPO. It aims to show investors a grand vision of transitioning from pure software to a software-hardware combination and expanding from the virtual world to the physical world. The company hopes to use the "embodied intelligence" story to hedge against market concerns about the sustainability of its business model and its massive losses.

OpenAI's advantage in entering the robotics field lies in its globally leading AI large model capabilities, particularly its "world model" for understanding and simulating the physical world. Its technical path may differ from many companies starting with hardware platforms, instead following a logic of "first build the brain, then grow the body." This means first enabling the AI to understand physical laws through a powerful world model, then infusing that capability into physical robots. If successful, this software- and algorithm-defined hardware approach could reshape the R&D model of the robotics industry.

This article is from "Jiemian News," author: Li Kefeng

Related Questions

QWhy is OpenAI restarting its robotics business after six years?

AOpenAI is restarting its robotics business primarily due to the rapid development of its internal 'Worldsim' research project, which evolved into 'OpenAI Robotics'. Additionally, a strategic partnership breakdown with Figure AI over technical disagreements on AI model integration for robots prompted the company to bring robotics back as an in-house strategic business, moving beyond mere investment.

QWhat are the short-term and long-term goals for OpenAI's new robotics strategy?

AOpenAI's short-term goal is to develop robots capable of assisting technical workers in building future infrastructure. Its long-term vision is to create personal robots for everyone that can fulfill various needs.

QWhat was the outcome and significance of OpenAI's Dactyl robotic hand research in 2019?

AIn 2019, OpenAI successfully trained an AI system to solve a Rubik's Cube using a Dactyl robotic hand. This research demonstrated the feasibility of training AI in simulation and transferring that capability to a real-world robot, proving a key technical pathway.

QHow did OpenAI's collaboration with Figure AI in 2024 proceed and end?

AIn February 2024, OpenAI invested in Figure AI's funding round and developed a multimodal AI model for its humanoid robot. The integrated robot demonstrated impressive capabilities within 13 days. However, the partnership ended in February 2025 when Figure AI decided to build its own end-to-end AI model, citing that general-purpose large models couldn't adequately meet specific robot hardware requirements.

QWhat is OpenAI's potential approach to developing robots, according to the article?

AOpenAI's potential approach is described as 'building the brain first, then the body.' This means focusing first on developing a powerful 'world model' AI that understands physical laws, and then instilling that capability into physical robots. This software and algorithm-first approach could potentially reshape robotics R&D.

Related Reads

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit52m ago

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit52m ago

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit1h ago

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片