New Wall Street Play: Yen Shorts Still Adding, But Japan Stocks Don't Rely on Carry Trade Unwinding

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-04Last updated on 2026-06-04

Abstract

On June 3rd, USD/JPY hit 160.44, its highest level since July 2024, while the Nikkei 225 surged past 68,000 points. Contrary to popular narratives of an imminent "carry trade unwind" akin to August 2024, data reveals a more complex picture. Speculative net short positions in yen futures have actually increased, reaching -114,667 contracts by late May, suggesting traders are doubling down rather than retreating. Meanwhile, Japan's Finance Ministry conducted its largest-ever single-round FX intervention (11.73 trillion yen) in April-May but failed to hold the 160 yen line. The Nikkei's rally is not driven by carry trade dynamics. Foreign investors are aggressively buying Japanese stocks, with net purchases in 2026 running nearly 16 times higher than 2025 levels. This inflow is concentrated in AI and semiconductor-related stocks like SoftBank and Socionext, fueled by positive sector outlooks, rather than being a flight from unwinding yen shorts. Furthermore, the Nikkei has continued climbing despite the Bank of Japan's (BOJ) rate hikes to 0.75%. This disconnect exists because the current equity boom is fueled by AI-driven foreign investment, not reliant on cheap yen funding. However, this relationship remains fragile. Should the BOJ hike rates further (e.g., to 1.0%) while dollar weakness increases carry trade costs, the trajectories of the yen and Japanese stocks could reconverge, potentially triggering volatility.

On June 3, USD/JPY touched 160.44 intraday, a new high since July 2024. On the same day, the Nikkei 225 index broke through 68,000 points for the first time, reaching a high of 68,634.74 points. These two figures together immediately triggered a familiar market narrative: 'The carry trade is about to collapse, August 2024 will repeat.'

This narrative is half right. The other half tells a completely opposite story according to the data.

Shorts Not Retreating, But Adding Instead

The most direct measure of the crowdedness of yen carry trades is the weekly Commitments of Traders (COT) report published by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). It records the net long or net short positions of speculative traders in the yen futures market.

According to the CFTC report for the week ending May 26, the net short yen futures positions held by non-commercial accounts reached 114,667 contracts—112,993 long positions versus 227,660 short positions. This represented a further increase of 27,152 contracts in net short positions compared to the previous week.

The chart reveals a somewhat counterintuitive trend. In July 2024, when USD/JPY approached highs around 161, the CFTC net short was near the historical extreme zone of about -180,000 contracts. Subsequently, in early August, a surprise rate hike by the Bank of Japan (BOJ) combined with a much-weaker-than-expected US non-farm payrolls report forced a massive unwinding of yen shorts within weeks. The net short position shrank sharply from about -180,000 contracts, even reversing to a net long position exceeding +177,000 contracts by Q2 2025—a systemic carry trade squeeze indeed occurred during that period.

But the subsequent trajectory went completely against the 'squeeze narrative.' Starting from late 2025, yen net short positions began accumulating again, turning negative in February 2026 and expanding rapidly to -102,000 contracts by April. As of May 26, the net short position had reached -114,667 contracts. When USD/JPY returned to around 160, global speculative capital wasn't fleeing, but rather continuing to add to their positions.

This means that if the BOJ sends a more hawkish signal at its July meeting, or if US economic data unexpectedly weakens again, this batch of -114,667 net short positions will face passive unwinding pressure highly similar to that of August 2024. Japan's Ministry of Finance is also aware of this—from April 28 to May 27, the MOF used a record 11.7349 trillion yen to buy yen and sell foreign currency, attempting to suppress the shorts.

Largest Single-Round Intervention Fails to Hold 160

Japan's Ministry of Finance has a history of foreign exchange intervention dating back to 1998. In the autumn of 2022, when the yen fell near 152, the MOF conducted its first 'yen-buying' operation since 1998: spending 2.84 trillion yen in September and adding another 6.34 trillion yen in October, totaling about 9.18 trillion yen. That round briefly pushed USD/JPY down from 152 to around 127, but the effect lasted only a few months.

In the spring of 2024, as USD/JPY again approached and briefly broke through 160, the MOF intervened with about 9.80 trillion yen, which was the largest single-round operation since 2022 at that time, and also 'the first confirmed buying intervention since 2022.'

According to monthly intervention data released by Japan's Ministry of Finance on May 29, 2026, the operation scale from April 28 to May 27 was 11.7349 trillion yen (approximately 73.6 billion USD), making it the largest single-round intervention on record. It exceeded the total intervention amount for the entire year of 2022 and was nearly 2 trillion yen more than the spring 2024 intervention.

However, less than a week after the MOF disclosed these figures, USD/JPY still climbed back above the 160 level. The largest-ever intervention failed to completely hold this psychological barrier.

Foreign Funds Buying Japan Stocks Chase AI, Not Safe-Haven Flows from Carry Unwinding

If carry trades remain crowded, why is the Nikkei 225 still hitting new highs?

According to Reuters citing data from Japan Exchange Group (JPX), overseas investors had been net buyers of Japanese stocks for the 8th consecutive week as of the week ending May 23, with a weekly net purchase of 1.08 trillion yen. The cumulative net purchase amount for the year to date is close to 11.7 trillion yen.

During the same period in 2025, foreign investors' cumulative net purchase was only 742.1 billion yen. The 2026 figure is 15.8 times that amount.

The destination of these funds is highly concentrated. Among the top-performing individual stocks during the same period, AI investment platform SoftBank Group rose 17.62% for the week, while chip designer Socionext gained 12.26%. The Reuters report directly explained the buying impetus: Nvidia's earnings outlook boosted prospects for AI and semiconductor demand, with foreign capital chasing this theme via the Japanese market.

This logic is completely different from the 'carry unwind triggers selling' logic of August 2024. Back then, it was forced de-risking and indiscriminate selling, with capital exiting the Japanese market. The foreign net buying in 2026 is an active choice to enter the Japanese market to pursue the AI reflation trade. Their driving mechanisms differ, and their implications for the Nikkei index are also different.

Rate Hikes Not Suppressing Stocks, But This Relationship Is Becoming More Fragile

Another counterintuitive aspect of the Nikkei 225 is its continued rise against the backdrop of consecutive BOJ rate hikes.

According to the Bank of Japan's policy decision announcements over the past two years, the rate hike path is as follows: March 2024 - ended negative interest rate policy, raising the policy rate from -0.1% to 0.1%; July 2024 - hiked again to 0.25%; January 2025 - hiked to 0.5%; December 2025 - hiked to 0.75%, the highest level since 1995. The April 2026 meeting maintained the rate at 0.75%, but passed by a 6-3 vote—three board members (Hajime Takata, Naoki Tamura, Junko Nakagawa) explicitly advocated for a hike to 1.0%.

The chart clearly shows that the correlation between rate hike events and Japanese stock movements has been completely different across stages. The July 2024 rate hike triggered a historic crash in the Nikkei 225, with a single-day drop of 12.4%—that was because the BOJ hike and weak US jobs data coincided, directly igniting the carry unwind. However, the two rate hikes in January and December 2025 were accompanied by the Nikkei 225 climbing from around 40,000 points all the way to the current new high of 68,634 points.

The reason behind this is not complicated: when the logic driving foreign buying is chasing the AI reflation trade, rather than relying on low yen interest rate funding costs, the BOJ's modest rate hikes have a quite limited impact on this portion of capital. Of course, this relationship is not immutable—if the BOJ indeed pushes the rate to 1.0% at its July meeting, while the US dollar weakens due to other factors, sharply increasing the funding cost for carry trades, the trajectories of these two curves may recouple at that point.

Putting the three charts together provides a relatively complete cognitive framework: yen short positions remain crowded, the MOF's historically largest intervention failed to hold 160, but the driver of the Japanese stock market's new highs is the AI-driven foreign capital inflow—all three statements can be true simultaneously, they are not mutually contradictory, and none alone can predict what happens next.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current status of yen carry trade positions according to CFTC data, and how does it compare to the situation before the 2024 August squeeze?

AAccording to the CFTC data as of May 26, speculative accounts hold a net short position of 114,667 contracts in yen futures. This indicates that carry trade positions are still crowded and have been increasing recently. This contrasts with the situation before the August 2024 squeeze, where the net short position was near -180,000 contracts, a historical extreme. While current levels are significant, they have not yet reached the peak seen before the 2024 unwind event.

QDespite Japan's largest-ever single round of FX intervention, why did the USD/JPY rate still break above 160?

AThe USD/JPY rate broke above 160 again shortly after Japan's Ministry of Finance disclosed its record 11.7349 trillion yen intervention conducted from April 28 to May 27. This suggests the intervention, while massive, was ultimately insufficient to completely defend the key 160 psychological level against the prevailing market forces driving yen weakness and dollar strength.

QWhat is the primary driver behind foreign investors' significant net buying of Japanese stocks in 2026, according to the article?

AThe primary driver is the pursuit of AI and semiconductor-related investment opportunities, fueled by a positive outlook for AI demand, as highlighted by companies like Nvidia. This is an active, thematic investment flow targeting specific sectors like AI platforms and chip designers, rather than a passive or避险 (risk-averse) flow related to the unwinding of yen carry trades.

QHow has the relationship between Bank of Japan (BOJ) interest rate hikes and the Nikkei 225 index performance changed over time?

AThe relationship has varied. The July 2024 rate hike, coinciding with weak US non-farm payroll data, triggered a massive 12.4% single-day Nikkei plunge due to a forced unwinding of carry trades. However, subsequent hikes in January and December 2025 occurred alongside a sustained rally in the Nikkei from around 40,000 to new highs above 68,000 points. This shift is attributed to the changing driver of equity inflows—from carry-trade dynamics to AI-focused investments—which are less sensitive to modest BOJ rate increases.

QWhat are the three key, seemingly contradictory facts presented in the article that form a complete picture of the current Japanese market?

AThe three key simultaneous facts are: 1) Yen short positions (carry trades) remain crowded and are still being added to. 2) Japan's historically largest foreign exchange intervention failed to decisively hold the USD/JPY rate below 160. 3) The Nikkei 225 is reaching new record highs, driven primarily by foreign capital chasing AI and reflation themes, not by避险 flows from carry trade unwinding.

Related Reads

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit20m ago

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit20m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit34m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit34m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit1h ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片