Why is XMR up today? Monero rallies as Zcash loses trust

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

Monero (XMR) surged over 60% in a week, reclaiming its position as the leading privacy coin by market cap, reaching around $13 billion. This rally coincided with a sharp decline in Zcash (ZEC), which fell 15–26% following governance issues and developer resignations. Capital rotated decisively from ZEC to XMR, driven by Monero's perceived stability, liquidity, and stronger narrative. The price broke key resistance levels, though overbought signals suggest potential pullbacks. The broader privacy sector also rallied, with Dash gaining 54%, indicating a sector-wide "privacy season." Continuation depends on XMR holding support levels, with a breakdown risking a pause in the rally.

Monero’s XMR token rose by over 2.54% in the last 24 hours, extending its 7-day rally to approximately over 60.21%.

After the mass resignation of Electric Coin Company developers on the 7th of January, Zcash’s ZEC token slipped hard.

Governance concerns escalated while confidence cracked. As a result, ZEC dropped between 15% and 26% in a single week.

Meanwhile, Monero moved the other way. XMR surged over 40%.

More importantly, it reclaimed the top spot among privacy coins by market capitalization with a marketcap of approximately $13 billion.

This divergence was not random. Capital rotated decisively out of Zcash [ZEC] and into Monero [XMR]. Investors favored stability, liquidity, and a cleaner narrative.

Monero leads as the market weighs continuation

At press time, XMR was trading at around $708. Monero pushed out of its long base near $420 with a sharp rise in volume.

Buyers acted with conviction. Momentum funds followed quickly. As a result, price sliced through $594 and $643 with little resistance.

However, RSI surged above 85, reflecting strong trend control rather than immediate weakness. This move aligns with capital rotation across the privacy sector.

That strength aligned with the uncertainty surrounding Zcash. Investors gravitated toward the most established privacy asset.

As a result, Monero reasserted sector leadership. Still, stretched momentum increased the risk of pauses or shallow pullbacks.

With the higher timeframe setting direction, lower timeframes clarified execution risk. On the one-hour chart, price topped near $798 before cooling toward the $700 zone.

Profit-taking emerged. Short-term traders locked in gains. RSI slipped toward neutral, allowing momentum to reset.

Despite this pullback, structure remained intact. Former resistance at $643 now acts as support as buyers continue to defend that zone.

If it holds, upside continuation stays viable. However, if it breaks, a retracement toward $594 becomes likely.

Is this the privacy season?

Privacy coin rotation accelerated between the 7th of January and mid-January 2026, marking it as a clear “privacy season.”

During this period, Monero rallied from roughly $420 to near $800, gaining over 40% in a week.

Its market capitalization expanded from about $9.2 billion to nearly $13 billion, implying roughly $3.5-$4 billion in net capital absorption.

This wasn’t an anomaly, the move was sector-wide. Dash [DASH]surged around 54%, adding an estimated $400-$500 million in market value, while smaller privacy tokens rose by around 20%.

Still, flows concentrated heavily in XMR making it the dominant privacy coin.

Zcash’s decline accelerated the shift, pushing capital toward Monero as the most liquid and resilient privacy asset.

All this together, Monero’s surge reflects a structural rotation, not noise. Capital exited Zcash and concentrated into XMR, driving a clear privacy season.

Momentum can continue if key support holds, but a breakdown would signal exhaustion and a pause in the sector-wide rally.


Final Thoughts

  • Monero’s breakout above $594 and $643 confirmed a regime shift, with price sustaining strength after a 60%+ weekly rally.
  • The move signals a privacy season led by XMR, but continuation depends on support holding and inflows remaining organic rather than leverage-driven.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy did Monero's XMR token experience a significant price increase recently?

AMonero's XMR token surged over 60% in a week due to a decisive capital rotation out of Zcash (ZEC) and into Monero, driven by investors seeking stability, liquidity, and a stronger narrative after Zcash lost trust following the mass resignation of Electric Coin Company developers.

QWhat event triggered the loss of confidence and price decline in Zcash (ZEC)?

AThe mass resignation of Electric Coin Company developers on January 7th escalated governance concerns and cracked investor confidence, causing ZEC to drop between 15% and 26% in a single week.

QWhat key price levels did Monero break through during its rally, and what is their significance now?

AMonero broke through the $594 and $643 resistance levels with little resistance. The former resistance at $643 now acts as a key support level; if it holds, upside continuation is viable, but a break could lead to a retracement toward $594.

QWhat is meant by 'privacy season' in the context of this article?

A'Privacy season' refers to the period from January 7th to mid-January 2026 where capital rotation into privacy coins accelerated significantly, with Monero leading the rally, gaining over 40%, and the entire privacy sector, including Dash and smaller tokens, experiencing substantial gains.

QWhat are the two main factors that will determine if Monero's momentum can continue, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Monero's momentum continuation depends on 1) key support levels (like $643) holding and 2) inflows remaining organic rather than driven by excessive leverage, as a breakdown would signal exhaustion and a pause in the rally.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit17m ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit17m ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片