Why is PIPPIN’s price up today? 16.8% OI spike, whale power & more

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

PIPPIN's price surged 32.3% in 24 hours, significantly outperforming Bitcoin and the broader crypto market. Over the past month, it has rallied over 2,022%. Key drivers include a 16.8% spike in Open Interest to $208 million and a 61.8% increase in daily trading volume, signaling strong bullish sentiment. However, the negative funding rate indicates most traders are shorting the token. The rally appears driven by coordinated whale accumulation, with 93 wallets holding 73% of the supply, raising concerns for retail investors. Despite ongoing buying pressure, a bearish divergence in the MFI indicator suggests a significant correction may be imminent, prompting advice to consider taking profits.

Pippin [PIPPIN] rallied another 32.3% in the past 24 hours, at press time. The performance was exceptional, considering Bitcoin [BTC] was down 3.96% and the total crypto market cap was down 4.13% during the same period.

PIPPIN bulls have been euphoric in recent weeks. Measured from the 21st of November, the autonomous AI agent and memecoin have rallied an immense 2,022%. A 20-fold price rally within a month, in these market conditions, is remarkable.

Especially when you consider that a whale who bought AI agent tokens on Base was forced to accept defeat and an 88.77% loss, highlighting the sector’s weakness.

Why is PIPPIN’s price surging?

The Open Interest (OI) behind the memecoin rose from $178 million on the 15th of December to $208 million at the time of writing. This 16.85% increase signaled strong bullish conviction.

A 61.8% daily trading volume boost was also encouraging for the bulls.

Even though OI rose, the Funding Rate was negative. This meant that a majority of the market was shorting the token, and the asset’s futures price was below its spot price.

In a post on X, the Evening Trader Group noted that the rally was primarily driven by whales accumulating a large chunk of the supply in a coordinated fashion.

This observation follows a previous case study where they showed that 93 wallets held 73% of the total supply in three well-defined clusters.

There were no indications of distribution or outflows. Instead, the synchronized activity pointed to structured accumulation rather than retail-driven flows, a development that left investors concerned.

Another reason why holders can look to take profit is the rapid pace of the rally itself. Since the start of December, the price has made new higher highs, while the MFI indicator has made lower highs.

This was a persistent bearish divergence that could lead to a sizable drawdown. On the other hand, the OBV’s continued rise indicated buying pressure remained strong.

Overall, the whale supply accumulation and the swift rally meant that PIPPIN holders might want to book profits instead of holding through a deep retracement.


Final Thoughts

  • The pippin token has made staggering gains over the past month.
  • The coordinated whale accumulation could be a serious threat to retail PIPPIN holders enjoying the current price action.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit1h ago

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit1h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit1h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit1h ago

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手1h ago

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片