Why Bitcoin in 2026 feels like two completely different markets at once

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-01Last updated on 2026-03-01

Abstract

The crypto market in 2026 appears strong on the surface, with Bitcoin acting as a safe-haven asset. However, underlying data reveals a split market. Key on-chain metrics like Coin Days Destroyed (CDD-90) have fallen to historic lows, indicating long-term holders are neither selling nor reacting to market swings. This suggests supply exhaustion rather than hesitation. A spike in dormant circulation in November showed long-term holders used the rally to exit, meaning most large-scale selling has already occurred. Remaining holders are deeply committed and inactive. Retail sentiment remains mixed, with some analysts noting a lack of panic, but critics remain skeptical. Historically, Bitcoin bottoms near the long-term holder cost basis (around $38,900), but current prices remain 66% above that, avoiding a deep reset. Selling is now driven mainly by short-term holders, while long-term investors stay steady. An early whale recently sold part of a large stash, indicating some profit-taking. Overall, Bitcoin feels like two markets: inactive long-term holders versus early whales slowly realizing gains. Barring a sharp economic downturn, the most likely outcome is extended sideways movement rather than a crash or major breakout.

On the surface, the crypto market appears strong. Despite ongoing global tensions, Bitcoin has behaved like a safe-haven asset, with steady price action supporting confidence.

However, beneath that strength, something unusual is unfolding.

Data from Alphractal showed that while new retail and institutional capital are actively trading, coins held for more than three years have almost stopped moving.

The Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) metric has fallen to historic lows, even on a 90-day average, indicating that long-term holders are neither selling nor reacting to market swings.

If looked at deeply, this phase showed that Bitcoin had been going through supply exhaustion rather than simple hesitation.

What are other on-metrics hinting at?

The Age Consumed metric shows that older holders were quiet, but as prices surged toward local highs in late November, that calm broke sharply.

Additionally, the 90-day Dormant Circulation also spiked sharply, showing that long-term holders used the rally to exit.

Data from Glassnode confirms that since December 2025, the 90-day Coin Days Destroyed (CDD-90) has dropped to very low levels.

In fact, as price drifted toward the $70,000 region in February 2026, there seems to be a strange divergence wherein price was weakening, but CDD-90 was not rising.

Normally, older holders react during stress. This time, they are not.

That suggests most large-scale selling already happened in November, and the remaining holders are deeply committed and inactive.

Still, low CDD-90 is not automatically bullish. If long-term holders are not selling, they are also not actively providing strong buy-side support.

Mixed retail sentiments

Yet despite this, the retail sentiment around Bitcoin [BTC] remains intact, as noted by Ex JP Morgan employee, Aditya Singhania, who said,

“There is absolutely zero panic in Bitcoin! Every one is in panic and expecting major fall tomorrow. Market might positively surprise most people. If there was real panic it would have been first seen in crypto market.”

However, not everyone shares the same sentiment as noted by forever Bitcoin critic, Peter Schiff, who said,

What’s ahead?

Historically, Bitcoin often finds a true bottom near its Long-Term Holder (LTH) cost basis, now around $38,900. With price still roughly 66% above that level, the market has not seen the deep reset typical of past bear cycles.

Current selling appears to be driven mainly by short-term holders, while long-term investors remain steady, a sign of pressure, but not panic.

At the same time, an early whale tracked by Lookonchain recently sold 500 BTC worth about $47.77 million from a 5,000 BTC stash bought near $332 years ago.

Overall, Bitcoin in 2026 feels like two markets at once. On one side are long-term holders who remain inactive and unmoved by volatility.

On the other hand are early whales who are slowly turning paper gains into real-world wealth. All in all, unless global economic conditions worsen sharply, the most likely outcome is a long period of sideways movement rather than a dramatic crash or breakout.


Final Summary

  • The November spike in dormant circulation suggests major selling already happened during the rally.
  • With OGs inactive, the market appears to be digesting prior distribution rather than entering fresh capitulation.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat does the historically low Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) metric indicate about long-term Bitcoin holders in 2026?

AThe historically low Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) metric indicates that long-term holders (coins held for more than three years) are neither selling nor reacting to market swings, suggesting supply exhaustion and deep commitment rather than simple hesitation.

QAccording to the article, what happened to dormant circulation when Bitcoin's price surged toward local highs in late November?

AThe 90-day Dormant Circulation spiked sharply in late November, showing that long-term holders used the price rally as an opportunity to exit and realize gains.

QWhat is the current sentiment among retail investors regarding Bitcoin, as noted by Aditya Singhania?

AAditya Singhania noted that there is 'absolutely zero panic in Bitcoin' among retail investors, and the market might positively surprise those expecting a major fall, indicating that retail sentiment remains intact.

QWhere does the article suggest Bitcoin often finds its true bottom in relation to Long-Term Holder (LTH) cost basis?

AHistorically, Bitcoin often finds a true bottom near its Long-Term Holder (LTH) cost basis, which is currently around $38,900.

QWhat is the most likely outcome for the Bitcoin market in 2026 unless global economic conditions worsen sharply?

AThe most likely outcome is a long period of sideways movement rather than a dramatic crash or breakout, as the market is digesting prior distribution with inactive long-term holders and early whales slowly taking profits.

Related Reads

Bernstein Analysis: Can the $142 Billion Long-Term Order Hold Up the Memory Cycle?

Bernstein revisits long-term agreements (LTAs) in the memory industry, highlighting new contracts with purchase commitments, minimum prices, and financial guarantees signed by Micron and SanDisk. These aim to provide an earnings floor for the coming years. Micron has 16 strategic customer agreements, with 14 representing approximately $100 billion in minimum revenue and about $22 billion in cash deposits/commitments. SanDisk has contracts for around $42 billion in minimum revenue and over $11 billion in guarantees. Combined, these ~$33 billion in guarantees make it more costly for major clients to walk away. However, Bernstein models that the potential revenue needing protection over 3-5 years is around $5.2 trillion. The existing guarantees thus cover only about 0.6% of that scale. While LTAs provide a cushion, they cannot fully shield profits in a severe downturn, as clients may still find it cheaper to breach contracts if spot prices fall deeply below floor prices. LTAs are most suitable for large, credit-worthy customers like U.S. cloud service providers with stable, high-volume AI infrastructure needs. Consumer segments (phones, PCs) and some Chinese clients are less likely to adopt them, leaving an estimated 30-50% of the DRAM/NAND market exposed to spot price volatility. AI demand (e.g., HBM for training, storage for inference) supports higher valuations and makes LTAs more attractive for locking in high-demand customers. Yet, Bernstein stresses that LTAs soften, but do not eliminate, the memory cycle. Their true test will come in the next downturn, revealing whether clients honor contracts and whether guarantees provide sufficient pain to maintain supplier discipline.

marsbit18m ago

Bernstein Analysis: Can the $142 Billion Long-Term Order Hold Up the Memory Cycle?

marsbit18m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit42m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit42m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit42m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

956 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片