‘We’re trying to defend Bitcoin’: Why BIP-110 is losing community support

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-12Last updated on 2026-07-12

Abstract

Blockstream CEO Adam Back argues that Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110), a contentious soft fork, is misguided. He contends discussions are fueled by misconceptions about Bitcoin's architecture, not malicious intent, and that the proposal's proponents are often well-intentioned newcomers. BIP-110, implemented in December 2025, aims to restrict arbitrary data like Ordinals inscriptions to prevent network spam and preserve Bitcoin's primary function as peer-to-peer cash. Back acknowledges spam is an issue but believes Bitcoin's existing market-driven mechanisms—transaction fees, miner incentives, and decentralized consensus—already address it. He argues BIP-110 clashes with Bitcoin's permissionless ethos and that a fork based on it would likely fail due to a lack of community support and because it contradicts Bitcoin's foundational principles. Market dynamics show limited support for the proposal, with only 10 out of 2,016 blocks backing a temporary upgrade on July 4th. Concurrently, Ordinals activity has dropped to all-time lows, with fewer than 10,000 inscriptions daily. Bitcoin's price has also fallen 45% over the past year. Michael Saylor echoes Back's critical stance on BIP-110.

Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP-110), the contentious Bitcoin [BTC] soft fork, is back in the news, and many industry experts are talking about it.

This time, Blockstream CEO Adam Back contended that misconceptions about Bitcoin’s architecture are fueling discussions over BIP 110 and the OP_RETURN policy. Acknowledging many BIP 110 proponents as well-intentioned newcomers, he added,

If these are the people with #110 in their handles, I’m sad to see them about to fork off and get disillusioned without understanding why bitcoin rejected 110 robustly.

AD

For background, BIP-110 was implemented in December 2025. This was done to prevent arbitrary data, such as Ordinals inscriptions, which resemble non-fungible tokens, from spamming the network and to maintain Bitcoin’s primary function as a peer-to-peer cash system.

Back acknowledges that spam is a genuine issue. However, he argues that Bitcoin already addresses it through market‐driven mechanisms. This includes things like transaction fees, miner incentives, and decentralized consensus, rather than restrictive rules.

Does BIP‐110 clash with Bitcoin ethos?

The CEO further argued that BIP 110 also goes against the permissionless nature of Bitcoin. He concluded that anyone who disagrees with its direction can fork the network and impose their own regulations.

Moreover, he contends that a fork based on BIP 110 is unlikely to be successful. This, he believes, would happen due to the lack of widespread community support and the fact that it goes against the fundamental ideas of Bitcoin.

He added,

It would be sad if bitcoin lost people disillusioned due to simple lack of understanding of what’s going on there, we’re all trying to defend bitcoin and keep it on mission.

Echoing similar sentiments, Strategy’s Michael Saylor said,

Source: Michael Saylor/X

Market dynamics raise further concerns

This criticism came after only 10 blocks out of 2,016 supported the temporary upgrade on the 4th of July.

Adding further pressure, Ordinals activity has dropped to all‐time lows. For the past month, fewer than 10,000 Ordinals have been added to the Bitcoin blockchain each day.

Source: Dune Analytics

Finally, Bitcoin’s price has fallen 45% over the past year, from its peak of $124,500 to $63,901.24 at press time.

Final Summary

  • Adam Back criticizes BIP-110 in light of false beliefs about the architecture of Bitcoin rather than malicious intent.
  • Saylor stands supporting Back’s argument as even Ordinals activity falls to its all-time lows.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the BIP-110 soft fork, and when was it implemented?

AThe main purpose of the BIP-110 soft fork was to prevent arbitrary data, such as Ordinals inscriptions, from spamming the Bitcoin network and to maintain Bitcoin's primary function as a peer-to-peer cash system. It was implemented in December 2025.

QWhat are Adam Back's main criticisms of the BIP-110 proposal?

AAdam Back's main criticisms are that BIP-110 is based on misconceptions about Bitcoin's architecture and that it clashes with Bitcoin's permissionless nature. He argues that spam is already addressed through market-driven mechanisms like transaction fees and miner incentives, and that imposing restrictive rules goes against Bitcoin's fundamental ethos.

QAccording to the article, what evidence suggests that community support for BIP-110 is low?

AThe article cites that only 10 blocks out of a required 2,016 supported the temporary upgrade on July 4th. Additionally, it notes that a fork based on BIP-110 is unlikely to succeed due to a lack of widespread community support.

QHow does Michael Saylor's position relate to Adam Back's argument?

AMichael Saylor echoes similar sentiments to Adam Back, supporting the argument against BIP-110. His supportive stance is highlighted in the article alongside the context of declining Ordinals activity.

QWhat are the key market dynamics mentioned that add pressure to the debate around BIP-110?

AThe key market dynamics mentioned are the drop in Ordinals activity to all-time lows (fewer than 10,000 per day for the past month) and Bitcoin's price falling 45% over the past year from its peak of $124,500.

Related Reads

How 5G Will Be Launched in Russia: The Digital Ministry's Proposal and the Roadmap to 2035

Russia's Ministry of Digital Development has proposed a plan for launching 5G networks. It allows the "Big Four" mobile operators (Beeline, Megafon, MTS, T2) to deploy 5G on existing 4G/LTE base stations and frequencies, and will allocate them the new 4.63–4.99 GHz band. A key element is "technological neutrality," permitting the use of foreign equipment until September 2026. The new 4.63–4.99 GHz band is intended for more advanced services and industrial applications. However, a phased transition to Russian-made base stations will begin in 2027, with a target of at least 50% domestic equipment by 2030. The rollout timeline aims for 5G in cities with over 1 million people by the end of 2027, expanding to 84 cities by 2035. Initial "5G Ready" service, operating over existing infrastructure, will offer minimal speed improvements. Significant speed gains (4-10x over LTE) will require the new band and corresponding equipment. The plan addresses long-standing regulatory delays, including the military's hold on the global standard 3.4–3.8 GHz band. This forced Russia to adopt the 4.63–4.99 GHz range, overlapping with a Chinese band, making Chinese equipment a potential transitional solution. The success of the rollout will depend on equipment supply and the pace of production localization, while a challenge lies in smartphone compatibility with this non-standard frequency band.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

How 5G Will Be Launched in Russia: The Digital Ministry's Proposal and the Roadmap to 2035

cryptonews.ru1h ago

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Announces a Colossal $700 Billion Allocation! How Will This Affect Bitcoin?

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas warns that the growing adoption of tokenized deposits in the banking sector could pose unforeseen risks to the financial system. Tokenized deposits, which transfer traditional bank deposits to blockchain infrastructure, offer features like instant settlement and programmable payments. While issued by regulated banks and maintaining deposit characteristics, they could enable customers to move funds between banks much faster in search of higher yields. This would significantly weaken banks' liquidity management and lending capacity. The Fed's analysis estimates that an increase in deposit interest rate sensitivity by 10% could reduce the interest rate risk banks can bear by approximately $700 billion over ten years. Similarly, a 10% shortening of the average deposit maturity could reduce the banking system's capacity to convert deposits into loans by about $580 billion. This acceleration of deposit movement could force banks to rely on more expensive wholesale funding, increasing borrowing costs for consumers and businesses and potentially making traditional banks resemble non-bank financial institutions. While the report does not directly address Bitcoin, the described shifts could have long-term implications. Firstly, the tokenization of deposits by banks could promote institutional adoption of blockchain-based financial infrastructure, indirectly legitimizing digital asset classes like Bitcoin. Secondly, faster-moving deposits and resulting higher funding costs could increase the price of liquidity in the financial system. This could create near-term headwinds for risk assets, including Bitcoin, due to tighter financial conditions and potential selling pressure. The report concludes that widespread adoption of this technology could impact many areas, from payment systems to monetary policy transmission mechanisms.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Announces a Colossal $700 Billion Allocation! How Will This Affect Bitcoin?

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Bitcoin ETF Assets Approach $100 Billion as Price Drops Below $80,000

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw their seventh consecutive day of net inflows, adding $314.37 million. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) captured the vast majority, attracting $284.42 million, while four other funds shared $29.95 million. Total assets under management for these ETFs neared $100 billion, reaching $99.05 billion. Meanwhile, spot Ethereum ETFs also continued their streak, attracting $179.80 million, with BlackRock's ETHA leading at $146.44 million. Inflows were also recorded for Solana, XRP, and other crypto ETFs. Despite this sustained institutional demand, Bitcoin's price briefly surpassed $80,000 before falling to around $78,447, and Ethereum traded near $2,462. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index dipped but remained in "Greed" territory.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Bitcoin ETF Assets Approach $100 Billion as Price Drops Below $80,000

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Decrease in XRP Ledger Transaction Count Coincides with a 521% Increase in Volume

The volume of payments on the XRP Ledger has surged by 521.1%, coinciding with a broader improvement in the cryptocurrency sector. Currently, the payment volume stands at 488.4 million XRP. However, it's crucial to note that while payment volume spiked, the number of payment transactions actually decreased by 10.5% to 388,900. This divergence indicates a significant increase in the average transaction size, suggesting activity from larger holders. Other metrics confirm increased activity: new accounts grew by 5.3% to around 1,800, and active users surged by 179.7% to approximately 485,700. Transaction fees in XRP increased by 16.1%, though the number of active accounts slightly decreased by 0.7% to 11,300. Regarding price, the XRP token is holding above the long-term moving average near $1.35. Consolidation above this level could help maintain the breakout structure. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) briefly rose above 80 before retreating to 70.5. While the 521% volume increase is notable, it does not equate to a sixfold rise in network usage. The pattern of fewer but larger transactions points to significant movement by major holders.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Decrease in XRP Ledger Transaction Count Coincides with a 521% Increase in Volume

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Blockchain Could Deprive U.S. Banks of $700 Billion in Lending Potential

The adoption of blockchain technology and tokenized deposits by traditional banks poses a significant threat to their lending capacity, potentially costing the U.S. financial system hundreds of billions of dollars in lost liquidity. A Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas report from August 2026 warns that this shift could fundamentally undermine the core banking model of maturity transformation, where banks use short-term deposits to fund long-term loans like mortgages. Tokenization increases depositors' rate sensitivity and enables instant, 24/7 fund transfers, which could lead to faster capital flight. The report estimates that a 10% increase in rate sensitivity could reduce U.S. banks' lending potential by $700 billion, while a 10% faster deposit outflow could drain another $580 billion. This forces banks to hold more low-yield, high-quality liquid assets (like cash reserves and U.S. Treasuries) to manage instant withdrawal risks, thereby diverting funds away from lending to businesses and households. The conclusion is that replicating crypto benefits such as speed and programmability without altering centralized banking's fundamental structure creates systemic contradictions, giving customers a crypto-like experience while depriving banks of their primary profit mechanism based on locking in customer funds.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Blockchain Could Deprive U.S. Banks of $700 Billion in Lending Potential

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.3k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow