Virtuals Is Not Really Doing AI Agent, But the Capital Market for AI Agent

Author: 137Labs

Over the past year, the discussion about AI Agent in the Crypto market has evolved from "Can AI go on-chain?" to "Can AI Agents form an independent economic system?" In this round of narrative evolution, the reason Virtuals Protocol has quickly become a market focus is not because it first proposed the concept of AI Agent, but because it has repackaged AI Agent from a functional software object into an economic entity that can be issued, traded, co-owned, capitalized, and ultimately participate in on-chain commercial activities.

This is also why many people, upon first contact with Virtuals, mistake it for just an AI Agent Launchpad. But upon closer observation of its product structure, protocol design, and growth path, one finds that Virtuals's real goal is far greater than just "launching Agents." It attempts to establish a complete set of mechanisms around AI Agents: issuance mechanisms, liquidity networks, commercial collaboration protocols, and economic systems. The core logic of this system is completely different from traditional AI SaaS companies; it's more like the "Capital Market for AI Agents" in the Crypto world.

Judging from the latest official whitepaper, Virtuals no longer simply emphasizes being an "AI Agent Creation Platform," but has begun to frequently use concepts like Agent Society, Agentic GDP, Autonomous Commerce, ACP, etc. This means the project is attempting to upgrade itself from a "hot track project" to "AI Agent Economic Infrastructure."

If we break down Virtuals's growth process, we find it almost precisely leverages the most effective growth levers in the Crypto world: narrative-driven growth, assetization for dissemination, community co-building, on-chain liquidity, speculative distribution, and protocol-layer expansion.

When AI Agent is Packaged as a Tradable Asset

The true starting point of Virtuals is not technology, but narrative.

Before entering the Crypto market, AI Agent was essentially just a software capability leaning towards being a tool. Whether it's AutoGPT, LangChain, or various AI Workflows, they are closer to productivity tools rather than assets that the market is willing to actively disseminate and participate in. But the first thing Virtuals did was to transform AI Agent from a "tool" into an "asset."

This change is crucial.

Because once an Agent is tokenized, its growth logic fundamentally changes. Users no longer pay attention to it just because "the product is useful," but begin to consider:

· Will it become the next hot Agent?

· Does it have community consensus?

· Does it have growth potential?

· Will its Token continue to rise?

· Can it form a new center of attention.

In other words, Virtuals did not try to circumvent the speculative nature inherent in the Crypto world, but directly designed "speculation" itself into the product distribution mechanism.

This is also why the market calls it the "AI Agent version of Pump.fun," because its biggest difference from traditional AI projects is not product functionality, but its inherent ability for asset dissemination.

Virtuals has formed a complete economic cycle around Agents, including Agent creation, Token issuance, community participation, DEX liquidity, and ecosystem expansion. These mechanisms together constitute its growth structure, distinguishing it from traditional AI projects.

When Speculative Behavior Begins to Assume User Growth Functions

The growth path of traditional internet products is usually:

Product → Users → Retention → Monetization.

But Virtuals's growth sequence is actually completely different.

It's closer to:

Narrative → Asset → Trading → Community → Users → Commercialization.

This is a very typical Crypto-native growth model.

Because in Virtuals, a user's first contact with an Agent is often not because they "want to use it," but because "its price is rising," "the community is discussing it," "it's forming new market consensus."

Thus, the asset price itself begins to assume the function of user growth.

This means Virtuals's growth is not typical Product-led Growth, but more like Speculation-led Distribution, i.e., using asset volatility and market sentiment to complete early attention diffusion and user acquisition.

And this is precisely something many Web2 AI products struggle to do.

Because traditional AI products must first prove functional value before acquiring users; but Virtuals can first use market sentiment to achieve traffic diffusion, then gradually supplement the product and commercial layers.

DWF Labs' analysis of the Genesis mechanism actually well illustrates Virtuals's further optimization of this growth model.

After the launch of Genesis, Virtuals began attempting to replace pure "front-running speculation" with ecosystem contributions, Virgen Points, and long-term participation, aiming to gradually transform one-time trading users into long-term ecosystem participants.

As of early May 2025, Genesis has attracted participation from over 8,300 unique addresses, generating approximately 18,900 cumulative transactions.

This means Virtuals is no longer content with just "creating hot assets," but is starting to try to establish a continuously operating Agent issuance market.

When the Community Transforms from a "User Group" into a "Shareholder Network"

Another important change brought by Virtuals is its redefinition of the community's role.

In traditional internet products, the community is usually just a gathering place for users. But in the Virtuals ecosystem, community members are simultaneously:

· Token holders;

· Liquidity providers;

· Content disseminators;

· Agent promoters;

· Potential governance participants.

In other words, the user identity is restructured.

The greatest advantage of this structure is its inherent strong dissemination motivation.

Because when a user holds an Agent Token, they will spontaneously participate in dissemination, discussion, and community building, as higher attention, more active trading, and stronger consensus for the Agent theoretically make it easier for the Token's market performance to improve.

Thus, the community is no longer just "product users," but becomes a "community of shared interests."

This is also a key reason why Virtuals can quickly achieve social virality.

Virtuals essentially establishes an attention economy model for AI Agents, where an Agent is not just a tool, but a cultural asset that can be co-owned and co-disseminated by the community.

This is also why Virtuals's dissemination method is closer to that of a Meme Coin, rather than a traditional AI product.

Because what it is truly growing is not functional dissemination, but consensus dissemination.

When On-Chain Liquidity Becomes the Infrastructure for AI Agents

If the biggest problem with Meme Coins is their typically extremely short lifecycle, then the real problem Virtuals subsequently wants to solve is:

How to make AI Agents not just "tradable," but truly capable of forming long-term commercial activities.

Thus, ACP begins to become Virtuals's most important new narrative.

ACP, the Agent Commerce Protocol, is essentially a commercial protocol layer that enables Agents to collaborate with each other, call services, complete payments, and settle on-chain.

This change is very important.

Because it means Virtuals is no longer content with being just an "Agent Token issuance platform," but is attempting to further become a "commercial network between Agents."

In other words, Virtuals is trying to solve a bigger problem:

When tens of thousands of AI Agents exist simultaneously, how do they collaborate with each other, form economic relationships, and generate real revenue.

Consequently, the growth logic also begins to change.

Early growth came from:

Agent Launch → Community Discussion → Token Trading → Attention.

Whereas the growth Virtuals wants to establish later is:

Agent Collaboration → Service Calls → On-chain Payments → Commercial Revenue → Agentic GDP.

After ACP v2's upgrade in 2026, it has begun supporting Hook-based architecture, multi-chain capabilities, and non-custodial Agent wallets. This indicates Virtuals is gradually migrating from a "hot asset platform" to a more fundamental Agent commercial infrastructure.

When "Agentic GDP" Begins to Become the New Narrative Metric

To strengthen the "Agent Economy" story, Virtuals proposed a highly viral concept:

Agentic GDP, or aGDP.

It attempts to measure the total volume of on-chain economic activity created by the entire Agent ecosystem.

From a narrative perspective, this concept is very clever, because it repackages Virtuals from a Launchpad into a "new economy composed of Agents."

According to public data, as of 2026, Virtuals has deployed over 18,000 Agents, with aGDP exceeding $479 million.

But problems are also beginning to emerge.

Currently, Virtuals's aGDP is highly concentrated in a few trading-oriented Agents, with the top three Agents contributing the majority of economic activity. These data reflect more the scale of on-chain transactions, not necessarily representing real profits or stable commercial revenue.

This means Virtuals has entered a very critical stage:

The market no longer just looks at whether it "can create hot topics," but begins to look at whether it "can form real commercial activities."

Because if aGDP ultimately is just packaged transaction volume, then Virtuals will still be seen as a high-volatility AI asset platform; but if in the future, Agents truly begin providing services, completing tasks, and generating stable income, then it has the opportunity to upgrade from a "narrative-driven project" into a genuine Agent commercial network.

When the Base Dividend Gradually Evolves into Ecosystem Expansion Capability

Virtuals's early explosion largely relied on Base.

Because Base simultaneously possesses:

· Coinbase backing;

· Consumer Crypto traffic;

· Meme trading atmosphere;

· AI Narrative;

· Low Gas costs.

These factors together constituted the optimal cold-start environment for Virtuals.

According to public information disclosure, as of 2025, Base accounted for over 90% of Virtuals's total daily active wallets, and the cumulative DEX trading volume of Agents within the ecosystem has exceeded $8 billion.

But by 2026, Virtuals has clearly begun attempts to shed the label of a "single-chain hot project."

Judging from the latest official structure, modules like ACP, Multi-chain Agent Wallet, Robotics, Butler, etc., have gradually formed a more complete ecosystem hierarchy.

The Robotics direction is particularly noteworthy.

Because this means Virtuals has begun attempting to extend Agents from the purely digital world to the real physical world.

If this step succeeds, then Virtuals's narrative will no longer be just an "AI Meme Coin platform," but could evolve into:

AI Agent's Capital Formation Network + Commercial Coordination Network + Robotics Economy Protocol Layer.

Of course, this is also the step with the greatest risk.

Because real-world commerce is far more complex than on-chain trading, involving hardware, supply chains, delivery capabilities, and real operations. These problems cannot be solved solely by Token mechanisms.

When the Market Begins to Re-evaluate the Quality of Virtuals's Growth

As of May 2026, the VIRTUAL market capitalization is around $600 million, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $140 million, but it has clearly retreated compared to the historical high in early 2025.

This is actually a very important signal.

Because it means the market is no longer just paying for the "AI Agent Narrative," but is beginning to re-evaluate:

· Whether Agents are truly generating revenue;

· Whether ACP is truly being used;

· Whether aGDP possesses real commercial quality;

· Whether the ecosystem has long-term retention;

· Whether Virtuals can break free from being purely trading-driven.

This is also the biggest watershed moment for Virtuals currently.

It has proven its ability to create market hype, form attention flywheels, complete asset dissemination, and community expansion. But what will truly determine its long-term value going forward is no longer its "narrative capability," but its "commercial闭环 capability."

Conclusion

If we must summarize the essence of Virtuals in one sentence, then what it is truly doing is not an AI Agent platform, but the capital market for AI Agents.

Its most important innovation is not enabling users to create AI Agents, but for the first time endowing AI Agents with the capabilities to be:

· Issuable;

· Fundable;

· Tradable;

· Disseminatable;

· Collaborative;

· Capable of forming commercial relationships.

And this point is what is most worthy of study about Virtuals.

Because for the first time, it has combined AI, Crypto, community, assets, and the protocol layer into a complete growth machine.

It first captures attention with the AI Narrative, then completes asset dissemination via Tokenization, forms consensus diffusion through community mechanisms, establishes a market with on-chain liquidity, and then attempts to upgrade these hot assets into genuine commercial entities through ACP and Agent Economy.

Therefore, whether Virtuals ultimately succeeds is no longer about its ability to continue creating new hot Agents, but about its ability to prove:

These Agents can ultimately truly form a continuously operating, continuously trading, continuously value-creating autonomous economy.