USDe outflows slash Ethena TVL by 50% after October 10 crash: What’s next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-25Last updated on 2025-12-25

Abstract

Ethena's TVL plummeted from $14.8 billion to $7.4 billion, a 50% drop, following the October 10 market crash. This was primarily driven by massive outflows of its yield-bearing stablecoin, USDe, which saw $8 billion redeemed over two months. The outflows were partly triggered by USDe's temporary depegging on Binance during the crash. While rival stablecoins attracted inflows, Ethena's native token, ENA, fell 62% to under $0.20. Despite the bearish sentiment, on-chain data indicates dip-buying activity, including by BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes, suggesting some investors viewed the low prices as a buying opportunity.

Ethena was one of the major losers after the October market crash. The protocol’s TVL (total locked value), primarily driven by its yield-bearing stablecoin USDe, decreased by half from $14.8 billion to $7.4 billion.

Over the same period, investors exited USDe in droves. In October alone, $5.7 billion was redeemed from the stablecoin, and this trend has continued for the past two months, totalling $8 billion.

USDe was the most affected because the October crash’s escalated liquidation was partly driven by its temporary depegging on the Binance platform.

USDe lags behind other stablecoins

In fact, a closer look at the yield-bearing stablecoin markets indicated that outflows have been particularly concentrated on the USDe.

In the past 90 days, as USDe faced massive outflows, similar products such as Sky’s sUSDS, Marple’s syrupUSDC and others attracted significant inflows.

ENA’s 62% dip attracts new demand

In other words, after the crash, most investors fled Ethena’s USDe to other rival yield-offering stablecoins. The risk-off was apparent on the ENA, the native token for the Ethena protocol.

After the liquidation cascade, ENA lost $0.5 and slumped 62% to below $0.2 in Q4.

In fact, the trading volumes, as tracked by OBV (On-balance volume) dropped to record lows, underscoring muted interest amid bearish grip.

But the current levels were similar to August 2024 lows and could offer a juicy discounted opportunity if the market rebounds.

Interestingly, Arthur Hayes, founder of BitMEX Exchange, dumped his ETH holdings for ‘high beta DeFi assets’, including ENA.

According to Lookonchain data, Hayes scooped 1.22 million ENA worth $257.5K. But Hayes wasn’t alone.

During the 62% decline, ENA’s supply outside of exchanges climbed higher, unlike the Q1 2025 dip.

This meant there was dip buying as some players took advantage of the discounted window to add more exposure to ENA.

Overall, Ethena emerged as one of the casualties of the October 10 crash, triggering $8B in USDe outflows and a 62% price decline for ENA.

While USDe was yet to front a strong recovery, ENA saw active buying during the dip.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethena’s USDe bled $8 billion in outflows since the October 10 liquidation event.
  • Although the bearish sentiment dragged ENA down by 62%, key players were dip-buying.

Related Questions

QWhat was the primary reason for the massive outflows from Ethena's USDe stablecoin after October 10?

AThe massive outflows were primarily driven by USDe's temporary depegging on the Binance platform during the October market crash, which escalated liquidations and eroded investor confidence.

QHow much did the Total Value Locked (TVL) in the Ethena protocol decrease by following the crash?

AThe TVL in the Ethena protocol decreased by half, dropping from $14.8 billion to $7.4 billion.

QDespite the overall bearish trend for ENA, what activity suggested that some investors saw an opportunity?

AThe supply of ENA held outside of exchanges increased during the decline, indicating that dip-buying was occurring as some players took advantage of the discounted price to accumulate more tokens.

QWhich prominent cryptocurrency figure bought ENA during the dip, and how much did they purchase?

AArthur Hayes, the founder of BitMEX Exchange, purchased 1.22 million ENA tokens, worth approximately $257.5K, as part of a move into 'high beta DeFi assets'.

QHow did the performance of other yield-bearing stablecoins like sUSDS and syrupUSDC compare to USDe in the past 90 days?

AWhile USDe faced massive outflows, rival yield-bearing stablecoins such as Sky’s sUSDS and Marple’s syrupUSDC attracted significant inflows over the same 90-day period.

Related Reads

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit35m ago

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit35m ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2h ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片